Effect of prostate and bony pelvic dimensions measured by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

Cole AP, Trinh QD, Sood A, Menon M (2017) The rise of robotic surgery in the New Millennium. J Urol 197(2S):S213–S215 Patel VR, Thaly R, Shah K (2007) Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases. BJU Int 99(5):1109–1112 Hong SK, Lee ST, Kim SS, Min KE, Hwang IS, Kim M et al (2009) Effect of bony pelvic dimensions measured by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on performing robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int 104(5):664–668 Takenaka A, Tewari AK (2012) Anatomical basis for carrying out a state-of-the-art radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 19(1):7–19 Boczko J, Erturk E, Joseph JV (2007) Is there a proper pelvic size for an extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy? J Endourol 21(11):1353–1356 Yao A, Iwamoto H, Masago T, Morizane S, Honda M, Sejima T, Takenaka A (2015) Anatomical dimensions using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging: impact on the learning curve of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Int J Urol 22(1):74–79 von Bodman C, Matsushita K, Matikainen MP, Eastham JA, Scardino PT, Akin O, Rabbani F (2011) Do pelvic dimensions and prostate location contribute to the risk of experiencing complications after radical prostatectomy? BJU Int 108(10):1566–1571 Ozkaptan O, Karadeniz T, Guzelburc V, Yilmaz K, Yılanoğlu O, Sahin S (2013) The effects of pelvic dimensions on radical retropubic prostatectomy. Can J Urol 20(3):6761–6767 Consultation WHOE (2004) Appropriate body-mass index for Asian populations and its implications for policy and intervention strategies. Lancet 363(9403):157–163 Briganti A, Larcher A, Abdollah F, Capitanio U, Gallina A, Suardi N (2012) Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores. Eur Urol 61(3):480–487 Boga MS, Sönmez MG, Karamık K, Yılmaz K, Savaş M, Ateş M (2020) The effect of peritoneal re-approximation on lymphocele formation in transperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy. Turk J Urol 46(6):460–467 Chang SS, Duong DT, Wells N, Cole EE, Smith JA, Cookson MS (2004) Predicting blood loss and transfusion requirements during radical prostatectomy: the significant negative impact of increasing body mass index. J Urol 171(5):1861–1865 Freedland SJ, Grubb KA, Yiu SK, Nielsen ME, Mangold LA, Isaacs WB, Epstein JI, Partin AW (2005) Obesity and capsular incision at the time of open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 174(5):1798–1801 (Discussion 1801) Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Edwards R, Skarecky DW (2005) Impact of obesity on clinical outcomes in robotic prostatectomy. Urology 65(4):740–744 Mikhail AA, Stockton BR, Orvieto MA, Chien GW, Gong EM et al (2006) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients. Urology 67(4):774–779 Wiltz AL, Shikanov S, Eggener SE, Katz MH, Thong AE, Steinberg GD et al (2009) Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes. Urology 73(2):316–322 Xu T et al (2015) Robot-assisted prostatectomy in obese patients: how influential is obesity on operative outcomes? J Endourol 29(2):198–208 Khaira HS, Wang X, Xia L, Zhang X, Qin L, Zhong S, Shen Z (2006) Does obesity influence the operative course or complications of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. BJU Int 98(6):1275–1278 (Discussion 1278) Hsu EI, Hong EK, Lepor H (2003) Influence of body weight and prostate volume on intraoperative, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 61(3):601–606 Singh A, Fagin R, Shah G, Shekarriz B (2005) Impact of prostate size and body mass index on perioperative morbidity after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol 173(2):552–554 Zorn KC, Orvieto MA, Mikhail AA, Gofrit ON, Lin S, Schaeffer AJ (2007) Effect of prostate weight on operative and postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology 69(2):300–305 Chang CM, Moon D, Gianduzzo TR, Eden CG (2005) The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 48(2):285–290 Rassweiler J, Sentker L, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Rumpelt HJ (2001) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the Heilbronn technique: an analysis of the first 180 cases. J Urol 166(6):2101–2108 El-Feel A, Davis JW, Deger S, Roigas J, Wille AH, Schnorr D (2003) Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy–an analysis of factors affecting operating time. Urology 62(2):314–318 D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Tomaszewski JE, Wein A (1998) A prostate gland volume of more than 75 cm3 predicts for a favorable outcome after radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. Urology 52(4):631–636 Freedland SJ, Isaacs WB, Platz EA, Terris MK, Aronson WJ, Amling CL et al (2005) Prostate size and risk of high-grade, advanced prostate cancer and biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy: a search database study. J Clin Oncol 23(30):7546–7554 Chen J, Chu T, Ghodoussipour S, Bowman S, Patel H, King K, Hung AJ (2019) Effect of surgeon experience and bony pelvic dimensions on surgical performance and patient outcomes in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 124(5):828–835 Mason BM, Hakimi A, Faleck D, Chernyak V, Rozenblitt A, Ghavamian R et al (2010) The role of preoperative endo-rectal coil magnetic resonance imaging in predicting surgical difficulty for robotic prostatectomy. Urology 76(5):1130–1135 Matikainen MP, von Bodman CJ, Secin FP, Yunis LH, Vora K, Guillonneau B et al (2010) The depth of the prostatic apex is an independent predictor of positive apical margins at radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 106(5):622–626