Gene positioning and genome function

Abruzzi K C, Belostotsky D A, Chekanova J A, Dower K, Rosbash M (2006). 3′-end formation signals modulate the association of genes with the nuclear periphery as well as mRNP dot formation. EMBO J, 25(18): 4253–4262 Ahmed S, Brickner D G, Light W H, Cajigas I, McDonough M, Froyshteter A B, Volpe T, Brickner J H (2010). DNA zip codes control an ancient mechanism for gene targeting to the nuclear periphery. Nat Cell Biol, 12(2): 111–118 Andrulis E D, Neiman A M, Zappulla D C, Sternglanz R (1998). Perinuclear localization of chromatin facilitates transcriptional silencing. Nature, 394(6693): 592–595 Ballester M, Kress C, Hue-Beauvais C, Kiêu K, Lehmann G, Adenot P, Devinoy E (2008). The nuclear localization of WAP and CSN genes is modified by lactogenic hormones in HC11 cells. J Cell Biochem, 105(1): 262–270 Belmont A S, Li G, Sudlow G, Robinett C (1999). Visualization of largescale chromatin structure and dynamics using the lac operator/lac repressor reporter system. Methods Cell Biol, 58: 203–222 Berezney R, Dubey D D, Huberman J A (2000). Heterogeneity of eukaryotic replicons, replicon clusters, and replication foci. Chromosoma, 108(8): 471–484 Bian Q, Khanna N, Alvikas J, Belmont A S (2013). β-Globin cis-elements determine differential nuclear targeting through epigenetic modifications. J Cell Biol, 203(5): 767–783 Blobel G (1985). Gene gating: a hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 82(24): 8527–8529 Boyle S, Gilchrist S, Bridger J M, Mahy N L, Ellis J A, Bickmore W A (2001). The spatial organization of human chromosomes within the nuclei of normal and emerin-mutant cells. Hum Mol Genet, 10(3): 211–219 Branco M R, Pombo A (2006). Intermingling of chromosome territories in interphase suggests role in translocations and transcriptiondependent associations. PLoS Biol, 4(5): e138 Brickner D G, Cajigas I, Fondufe-Mittendorf Y, Ahmed S, Lee P C, Widom J, Brickner J H (2007). H2A.Z-mediated localization of genes at the nuclear periphery confers epigenetic memory of previous transcriptional state. PLoS Biol, 5(4): e81 Brickner J H, Walter P (2004). Gene recruitment of the activated INO1 locus to the nuclear membrane. PLoS Biol, 2(11): e342 Brown C R, Kennedy C J, Delmar V A, Forbes D J, Silver P A (2008a). Global histone acetylation induces functional genomic reorganization at mammalian nuclear pore complexes. Genes Dev, 22(5): 627–639 Brown J M, Green J, das Neves R P, Wallace H A, Smith A J, Hughes J, Gray N, Taylor S, Wood W G, Higgs D R, Iborra F J, Buckle V J (2008b). Association between active genes occurs at nuclear speckles and is modulated by chromatin environment. J Cell Biol, 182(6): 1083–1097 Brown J M, Leach J, Reittie J E, Atzberger A, Lee-Prudhoe J, Wood W G, Higgs D R, Iborra F J, Buckle V J (2006). Coregulated human globin genes are frequently in spatial proximity when active. J Cell Biol, 172(2): 177–187 Brown K E, Baxter J, Graf D, Merkenschlager M, Fisher A G (1999). Dynamic repositioning of genes in the nucleus of lymphocytes preparing for cell division. Mol Cell, 3(2): 207–217 Brown K E, Guest S S, Smale S T, Hahm K, Merkenschlager M, Fisher A G (1997). Association of transcriptionally silent genes with Ikaros complexes at centromeric heterochromatin. Cell, 91(6): 845–854 Cabal G G, Genovesio A, Rodriguez-Navarro S, Zimmer C, Gadal O, Lesne A, Buc H, Feuerbach-Fournier F, Olivo-Marin J C, Hurt E C, Nehrbass U (2006). SAGA interacting factors confine sub-diffusion of transcribed genes to the nuclear envelope. Nature, 441(7094): 770–773 Capelson M, Liang Y, Schulte R, Mair W, Wagner U, Hetzer M W (2010). Chromatin-bound nuclear pore components regulate gene expression in higher eukaryotes. Cell, 140(3): 372–383 Casolari J M, Brown C R, Drubin D A, Rando O J, Silver P A (2005). Developmentally induced changes in transcriptional program alter spatial organization across chromosomes. Genes Dev, 19(10): 1188–1198 Casolari J M, Brown C R, Komili S, West J, Hieronymus H, Silver P A (2004). Genome-wide localization of the nuclear transport machinery couples transcriptional status and nuclear organization. Cell, 117(4): 427–439 Chan E A, Teng G, Corbett E, Choudhury K R, Bassing C H, Schatz D G, Krangel MS (2013). Peripheral subnuclear positioning suppresses Tcrb recombination and segregates Tcrb alleles from RAG2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 110(48): E4628–E4637 Chen B, Gilbert L A, Cimini B A, Schnitzbauer J, Zhang W, Li G W, Park J, Blackburn E H, Weissman J S, Qi L S, Huang B (2013). Dynamic imaging of genomic loci in living human cells by an optimized CRISPR/Cas system. Cell, 155(7): 1479–1491 Chuang C H, Carpenter A E, Fuchsova B, Johnson T, de Lanerolle P, Belmont A S (2006). Long-range directional movement of an interphase chromosome site. Curr Biol, 16(8): 825–831 Croft J A, Bridger J M, Boyle S, Perry P, Teague P, Bickmore W A (1999). Differences in the localization and morphology of chromosomes in the human nucleus. J Cell Biol, 145(6): 1119–1131 Csink A K, Henikoff S (1996). Genetic modification of heterochromatic association and nuclear organization in Drosophila. Nature, 381(6582): 529–531 de Wit E, de Laat W (2012). A decade of 3C technologies: insights into nuclear organization. Genes Dev, 26(1): 11–24 Dekker J, Rippe K, Dekker M, Kleckner N (2002). Capturing chromosome conformation. Science, 295(5558): 1306–1311 Deng W, Blobel G A (2013). Manipulating nuclear architecture. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 25C: 1–7 Deng W, Lee J, Wang H, Miller J, Reik A, Gregory P D, Dean A, Blobel G A (2012). Controlling long-range genomic interactions at a native locus by targeted tethering of a looping factor. Cell, 149(6): 1233–1244 Dernburg A F, Broman KW, Fung J C, Marshall WF, Philips J, Agard D A, Sedat J W (1996). Perturbation of nuclear architecture by longdistance chromosome interactions. Cell, 85(5): 745–759 Dieppois G, Iglesias N, Stutz F (2006). Cotranscriptional recruitment to the mRNA export receptor Mex67p contributes to nuclear pore anchoring of activated genes. Mol Cell Biol, 26(21): 7858–7870 Dimitrova D S, Gilbert D M (1999). The spatial position and replication timing of chromosomal domains are both established in early G1 phase. Mol Cell, 4(6): 983–993 Dirks R W, de Pauw E S, Raap A K (1997). Splicing factors associate with nuclear HCMV-IE transcripts after transcriptional activation of the gene, but dissociate upon transcription inhibition: evidence for a dynamic organization of splicing factors. J Cell Sci, 110(Pt 4): 515–522 Dostie J, Richmond T A, Arnaout R A, Selzer R R, Lee WL, Honan T A, Rubio E D, Krumm A, Lamb J, Nusbaum C, Green R D, Dekker J (2006). Chromosome Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res, 16(10): 1299–1309 Drubin D A, Garakani A M, Silver P A (2006). Motion as a phenotype: the use of live-cell imaging and machine visual screening to characterize transcription-dependent chromosome dynamics. BMC Cell Biol, 7(1): 19 Dundr M, Ospina J K, Sung M H, John S, Upender M, Ried T, Hager G L, Matera A G (2007). Actin-dependent intranuclear repositioning of an active gene locus in vivo. J Cell Biol, 179(6): 1095–1103 Ferrai C, de Castro I J, Lavitas L, Chotalia M, Pombo A (2010). Gene positioning. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol, 2(6): a000588 Finlan L E, Sproul D, Thomson I, Boyle S, Kerr E, Perry P, Ylstra B, Chubb J R, Bickmore W A (2008). Recruitment to the nuclear periphery can alter expression of genes in human cells. PLoS Genet, 4(3): e1000039 Fraser P, Bickmore W (2007). Nuclear organization of the genome and the potential for gene regulation. Nature, 447(7143): 413–417 Gaj T, Gersbach C A, Barbas C F 3rd (2013). ZFN, TALEN, and CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol, 31(7): 397–405 Germann S, Juul-Jensen T, Letarnec B, Gaudin V (2006). DamID, a new tool for studying plant chromatin profiling in vivo, and its use to identify putative LHP1 target loci. Plant J, 48(1): 153–163 Geyer P K, Vitalini M W, Wallrath L L (2011). Nuclear organization: taking a position on gene expression. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 23(3): 354–359 Gilbert D M (2001). Nuclear position leaves its mark on replication timing. J Cell Biol, 152(2): F11–F15 Green EM, Jiang Y, Joyner R, Weis K (2012). A negative feedback loop at the nuclear periphery regulates GAL gene expression. Mol Biol Cell, 23(7): 1367–1375 Guelen L, Pagie L, Brasset E, Meuleman W, Faza M B, Talhout W, Eussen B H, de Klein A, Wessels L, de Laat W, van Steensel B (2008). Domain organization of human chromosomes revealed by mapping of nuclear lamina interactions. Nature, 453(7197): 948–951 Haaf T, Schmid M (1991). Chromosome topology in mammalian interphase nuclei. Exp Cell Res, 192(2): 325–332 Hepperger C, Mannes A, Merz J, Peters J, Dietzel S (2008). Threedimensional positioning of genes in mouse cell nuclei. Chromosoma, 117(6): 535–551 Hewitt S L, High F A, Reiner S L, Fisher A G, Merkenschlager M (2004). Nuclear repositioning marks the selective exclusion of lineage-inappropriate transcription factor loci during T helper cell differentiation. Eur J Immunol, 34(12): 3604–3613 Hofmann W A, Johnson T, Klapczynski M, Fan J L, de Lanerolle P (2006). From transcription to transport: emerging roles for nuclear myosin I. Biochem Cell Biol, 84(4): 418–426 Horike S, Cai S, Miyano M, Cheng J F, Kohwi-Shigematsu T (2005). Loss of silent-chromatin looping and impaired imprinting of DLX5 in Rett syndrome. Nat Genet, 37(1): 31–40 Ishii K, Arib G, Lin C, Van Houwe G, Laemmli U K (2002). Chromatin boundaries in budding yeast: the nuclear pore connection. Cell, 109(5): 551–562 Isogai Y, Tjian R (2003). Targeting genes and transcription factors to segregated nuclear compartments. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 15(3): 296–303 Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna J A, Charpentier E (2012). A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science, 337(6096): 816–821 Jost K L, Haase S, Smeets D, Schrode N, Schmiedel J M, Bertulat B, Herzel H, Cremer M, Cardoso M C (2011). 3D-Image analysis platform monitoring relocation of pluripotency genes during reprogramming. Nucleic Acids Res, 39(17): e113 Kalverda B, Fornerod M (2010). Characterization of genome-nucleoporin interactions in Drosophila links chromatin insulators to the nuclear pore complex. Cell Cycle, 9(24): 4812–4817 Kalverda B, Pickersgill H, Shloma V V, Fornerod M (2010). Nucleoporins directly stimulate expression of developmental and cell-cycle genes inside the nucleoplasm. Cell, 140(3): 360–371 Kind J, Pagie L, Ortabozkoyun H, Boyle S, de Vries S S, Janssen H, Amendola M, Nolen L D, Bickmore W A, van Steensel B (2013). Single-cell dynamics of genome-nuclear lamina interactions. Cell, 153(1): 178–192 Kind J, van Steensel B (2010). Genome-nuclear lamina interactions and gene regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 22(3): 320–325 Kohwi M, Lupton J R, Lai S L, Miller M R, Doe C Q (2013). Developmentally regulated subnuclear genome reorganization restricts neural progenitor competence in Drosophila. Cell, 152(1–2): 97–108 Kosak S T, Skok J A, Medina K L, Riblet R, Le Beau M M, Fisher A G, Singh H (2002). Subnuclear compartmentalization of immunoglobulin loci during lymphocyte development. Science, 296(5565): 158–162 Kouzine F, Liu J, Sanford S, Chung H J, Levens D (2004). The dynamic response of upstream DNA to transcription-generated torsional stress. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 11(11): 1092–1100 Kress C, Kiêu K, Droineau S, Galio L, Devinoy E (2011). Specific positioning of the casein gene cluster in active nuclear domains in luminal mammary epithelial cells. Chromosome Res, 19(8): 979–997 Kumaran R I, Spector D L (2008). A genetic locus targeted to the nuclear periphery in living cells maintains its transcriptional competence. J Cell Biol, 180(1): 51–65 Kundu S, Horn P J, Peterson C L (2007). SWI/SNF is required for transcriptional memory at the yeast GAL gene cluster. Genes Dev, 21(8): 997–1004 Lamond A I, Sleeman J E (2003). Nuclear substructure and dynamics. Curr Biol, 13(21): R825–R828 Lanctôt C, Cheutin T, Cremer M, Cavalli G, Cremer T (2007). Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions. Nat Rev Genet, 8(2): 104–115 Lawrence J B, Clemson C M (2008). Gene associations: true romance or chance meeting in a nuclear neighborhood? J Cell Biol, 182(6): 1035–1038 Lee H, Quinn J C, Prasanth K V, Swiss V A, Economides K D, Camacho M M, Spector D L, Abate-Shen C (2006). PIAS1 confers DNAbinding specificity on the Msx1 homeoprotein. Genes Dev, 20(7): 784–794 Levsky J M, Singer R H (2003). Fluorescence in situ hybridization: past, present and future. J Cell Sci, 116(Pt 14): 2833–2838 Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum N L, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A, Amit I, Lajoie B R, Sabo P J, Dorschner M O, Sandstrom R, Bernstein B, Bender M A, Groudine M, Gnirke A, Stamatoyannopoulos J, Mirny L A, Lander E S, Dekker J (2009). Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science, 326(5950): 289–293 Lionnet T, Czaplinski K, Darzacq X, Shav-Tal Y, Wells A L, Chao J A, Park H Y, de Turris V, Lopez-Jones M, Singer R H (2011). A transgenic mouse for in vivo detection of endogenous labeled mRNA. Nat Methods, 8(2): 165–170 Luperchio T R, Wong X, Reddy K L (2014). Genome regulation at the peripheral zone: lamina associated domains in development and disease. Curr Opin Genet Dev, 25C: 50–61 Luthra R, Kerr S C, Harreman MT, Apponi L H, Fasken MB, Ramineni S, Chaurasia S, Valentini S R, Corbett A H (2007). Actively transcribed GAL genes can be physically linked to the nuclear pore by the SAGA chromatin modifying complex. J Biol Chem, 282(5): 3042–3049 Marko J F, Poirier M G (2003). Micromechanics of chromatin and chromosomes. Biochem Cell Biol, 81(3): 209–220 Mattout A, Meshorer E (2010). Chromatin plasticity and genome organization in pluripotent embryonic stem cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 22(3): 334–341 Matzke A J, Huettel B, van der Winden J, Matzke M(2005). Use of twocolor fluorescence-tagged transgenes to study interphase chromosomes in living plants. Plant Physiol, 139(4): 1586–1596 Meaburn K J, Gudla P R, Khan S, Lockett S J, Misteli T (2009). Diseasespecific gene repositioning in breast cancer. J Cell Biol, 187(6): 801–812 Meaburn K J, Misteli T (2008). Locus-specific and activity-independent gene repositioning during early tumorigenesis. J Cell Biol, 180(1): 39–50 Meister P, Towbin B D, Pike B L, Ponti A, Gasser S M (2010). The spatial dynamics of tissue-specific promoters during C. elegans development. Genes Dev, 24(8): 766–782 Meuleman W, Peric-Hupkes D, Kind J, Beaudry J B, Pagie L, Kellis M, Reinders M, Wessels L, van Steensel B (2013). Constitutive nuclear lamina-genome interactions are highly conserved and associated with A/T-rich sequence. Genome Res, 23(2): 270–280 Mewborn S K, Puckelwartz M J, Abuisneineh F, Fahrenbach J P, Zhang Y, MacLeod H, Dellefave L, Pytel P, Selig S, Labno C M, Reddy K, Singh H, McNally E (2010). Altered chromosomal positioning, compaction, and gene expression with a lamin A/C gene mutation. PLoS ONE, 5(12): e14342 Misteli T (2007). Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function. Cell, 128(4): 787–800 Miyanari Y, Ziegler-Birling C, Torres-Padilla M E (2013). Live visualization of chromatin dynamics with fluorescent TALEs. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 20(11): 1321–1324 Moen P T Jr, Johnson C V, Byron M, Shopland L S, de la Serna I L, Imbalzano A N, Lawrence J B (2004). Repositioning of musclespecific genes relative to the periphery of SC-35 domains during skeletal myogenesis. Mol Biol Cell, 15(1): 197–206 Nagano T, Lubling Y, Stevens T J, Schoenfelder S, Yaffe E, Dean W, Laue E D, Tanay A, Fraser P (2013). Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature, 502(7469): 59–64 Naumova N, Smith E M, Zhan Y, Dekker J (2012). Analysis of longrange chromatin interactions using Chromosome Conformation Capture. Methods, 58(3): 192–203 Németh A, Conesa A, Santoyo-Lopez J, Medina I, Montaner D, Péterfia B, Solovei I, Cremer T, Dopazo J, Längst G (2010). Initial genomics of the human nucleolus. PLoS Genet, 6(3): e1000889 Neumann F R, Dion V, Gehlen L R, Tsai-Pflugfelder M, Schmid R, Taddei A, Gasser S M (2012). Targeted INO80 enhances subnuclear chromatin movement and ectopic homologous recombination. Genes Dev, 26(4): 369–383 O’Gorman S, Fox D T, Wahl G M (1991). Recombinase-mediated gene activation and site-specific integration in mammalian cells. Science, 251(4999): 1351–1355 Osborne C S, Chakalova L, Brown K E, Carter D, Horton A, Debrand E, Goyenechea B, Mitchell J A, Lopes S, Reik W, Fraser P (2004). Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription. Nat Genet, 36(10): 1065–1071 Osborne C S, Chakalova L, Mitchell J A, Horton A, Wood A L, Bolland D J, Corcoran A E, Fraser P (2007). Myc dynamically and preferentially relocates to a transcription factory occupied by Igh. PLoS Biol, 5(8): e192 Parada L, Misteli T (2002). Chromosome positioning in the interphase nucleus. Trends Cell Biol, 12(9): 425–432 Patel N S, Rhinn M, Semprich C I, Halley P A, Dollé P, Bickmore W A, Storey K G (2013). FGF signalling regulates chromatin organisation during neural differentiation via mechanisms that can be uncoupled from transcription. PLoS Genet, 9(7): e1003614 Pederson T (2002). Dynamics and genome-centricity of interchromatin domains in the nucleus. Nat Cell Biol, 4(12): E287–E291 Peric-Hupkes D, Meuleman W, Pagie L, Bruggeman S W, Solovei I, Brugman W, Gräf S, Flicek P, Kerkhoven R M, van Lohuizen M, Reinders M, Wessels L, van Steensel B (2010). Molecular maps of the reorganization of genome-nuclear lamina interactions during differentiation. Mol Cell, 38(4): 603–613 Pickersgill H, Kalverda B, de Wit E, Talhout W, Fornerod M, van Steensel B (2006). Characterization of the Drosophila melanogaster genome at the nuclear lamina. Nat Genet, 38(9): 1005–1014 Ragoczy T, Bender M A, Telling A, Byron R, Groudine M (2006). The locus control region is required for association of the murine betaglobin locus with engaged transcription factories during erythroid maturation. Genes Dev, 20(11): 1447–1457 Reddy K L, Zullo J M, Bertolino E, Singh H (2008). Transcriptional repression mediated by repositioning of genes to the nuclear lamina. Nature, 452(7184): 243–247 Robinett C C, Straight A, Li G, Willhelm C, Sudlow G, Murray A, Belmont A S (1996). In vivo localization of DNA sequences and visualization of large-scale chromatin organization using lac operator/repressor recognition. J Cell Biol, 135(6 Pt 2): 1685–1700 Rohner S, Kalck V, Wang X, Ikegami K, Lieb J D, Gasser S M, Meister P (2013). Promoter- and RNA polymerase II-dependent hsp-16 gene association with nuclear pores in Caenorhabditis elegans. J Cell Biol, 200(5): 589–604 Sarma N J, Haley TM, Barbara K E, Buford T D, Willis K A, Santangelo G M (2007). Glucose-responsive regulators of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae function at the nuclear periphery via a reverse recruitment mechanism. Genetics, 175(3): 1127–1135 Schermelleh L, Carlton P M, Haase S, Shao L, Winoto L, Kner P, Burke B, Cardoso M C, Agard D A, Gustafsson M G, Leonhardt H, Sedat J W (2008). Subdiffraction multicolor imaging of the nuclear periphery with 3D structured illumination microscopy. Science, 320(5881): 1332–1336 Schmid M, Arib G, Laemmli C, Nishikawa J, Durussel T, Laemmli U K (2006). Nup-PI: the nucleopore-promoter interaction of genes in yeast. Mol Cell, 21(3): 379–391 Schoenfelder S, Sexton T, Chakalova L, Cope N F, Horton A, Andrews S, Kurukuti S, Mitchell J A, Umlauf D, Dimitrova D S, Eskiw C H, Luo Y, Wei C L, Ruan Y, Bieker J J, Fraser P (2010). Preferential associations between co-regulated genes reveal a transcriptional interactome in erythroid cells. Nat Genet, 42(1): 53–61 Schröck E, du Manoir S, Veldman T, Schoell B, Wienberg J, Ferguson-Smith M A, Ning Y, Ledbetter D H, Bar-Am I, Soenksen D, Garini Y, Ried T (1996). Multicolor spectral karyotyping of human chromosomes. Science, 273(5274): 494–497 Sexton T, Schober H, Fraser P, Gasser S M (2007). Gene regulation through nuclear organization. Nat Struct Mol Biol, 14(11): 1049–1055 Simonis M, Klous P, Splinter E, Moshkin Y, Willemsen R, deWit E, van Steensel B, de Laat W (2006). Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat Genet, 38(11): 1348–1354 Simonis M, Kooren J, de Laat W (2007). An evaluation of 3C-based methods to capture DNA interactions. Nat Methods, 4(11): 895–901 Solovei I, Cavallo A, Schermelleh L, Jaunin F, Scasselati C, Cmarko D, Cremer C, Fakan S, Cremer T (2002). Spatial preservation of nuclear chromatin architecture during three-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization (3D-FISH). Exp Cell Res, 276(1): 10–23 Solovei I, Kreysing M, Lanctôt C, Kösem S, Peichl L, Cremer T, Guck J, Joffe B (2009). Nuclear architecture of rod photoreceptor cells adapts to vision in mammalian evolution. Cell, 137(2): 356–368 Spector D L (2001). Nuclear domains. J Cell Sci, 114(Pt 16): 2891–2893 Splinter E, de Wit E, Nora E P, Klous P, van de Werken H J, Zhu Y, Kaaij L J, van Ijcken W, Gribnau J, Heard E, de Laat W (2011). The inactive X chromosome adopts a unique three-dimensional conformation that is dependent on Xist RNA. Genes Dev, 25(13): 1371–1383 Steglich B, Filion G J, van Steensel B, Ekwall K (2012). The inner nuclear membrane proteins Man1 and Ima1 link to two different types of chromatin at the nuclear periphery in S. pombe. Nucleus, 3(1): 77–87 Sun H B, Shen J, Yokota H (2000). Size-dependent positioning of human chromosomes in interphase nuclei. Biophys J, 79(1): 184–190 Szczerbal I, Foster H A, Bridger J M (2009). The spatial repositioning of adipogenesis genes is correlated with their expression status in a porcine mesenchymal stem cell adipogenesis model system. Chromosoma, 118(5): 647–663 Taddei A (2007). Active genes at the nuclear pore complex. Curr Opin Cell Biol, 19(3): 305–310 Taddei A, Van Houwe G, Hediger F, Kalck V, Cubizolles F, Schober H, Gasser S M (2006). Nuclear pore association confers optimal expression levels for an inducible yeast gene. Nature, 441(7094): 774–778 Takizawa T, Gudla P R, Guo L, Lockett S, Misteli T (2008a). Allelespecific nuclear positioning of the monoallelically expressed astrocyte marker GFAP. Genes Dev, 22(4): 489–498 Takizawa T, Meaburn K J, Misteli T (2008b). The meaning of gene positioning. Cell, 135(1): 9–13 Tanabe H, Müller S, Neusser M, von Hase J, Calcagno E, Cremer M, Solovei I, Cremer C, Cremer T (2002). Evolutionary conservation of chromosome territory arrangements in cell nuclei from higher primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99(7): 4424–4429 Tolhuis B, Blom M, Kerkhoven R M, Pagie L, Teunissen H, Nieuwland M, Simonis M, de Laat W, van Lohuizen M, van Steensel B (2011). Interactions among Polycomb domains are guided by chromosome architecture. PLoS Genet, 7(3): e1001343 Towbin B D, González-Aguilera C, Sack R, Gaidatzis D, Kalck V, Meister P, Askjaer P, Gasser S M (2012). Step-wise methylation of histone H3K9 positions heterochromatin at the nuclear periphery. Cell, 150(5): 934–947 Towbin B D, Meister P, Pike B L, Gasser S M (2010). Repetitive transgenes in C. elegans accumulate heterochromatic marks and are sequestered at the nuclear envelope in a copy-number- and lamindependent manner. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, 75(0): 555–565 Tumbar T, Belmont A S (2001). Interphase movements of a DNA chromosome region modulated by VP16 transcriptional activator. Nat Cell Biol, 3(2): 134–139 van Koningsbruggen S, Gierlinski M, Schofield P, Martin D, Barton G J, Ariyurek Y, den Dunnen J T, Lamond A I (2010). High-resolution whole-genome sequencing reveals that specific chromatin domains from most human chromosomes associate with nucleoli. Mol Biol Cell, 21(21): 3735–3748 van Steensel B, Dekker J (2010). Genomics tools for unraveling chromosome architecture. Nat Biotechnol, 28(10): 1089–1095 van Steensel B, Henikoff S (2000). Identification of in vivo DNA targets of chromatin proteins using tethered dam methyltransferase. Nat Biotechnol, 18(4): 424–428 Vaquerizas J M, Suyama R, Kind J, Miura K, Luscombe N M, Akhtar A (2010). Nuclear pore proteins nup153 and megator define transcriptionally active regions in the Drosophila genome. PLoS Genet, 6(2): e1000846 Vermeulen M, Mulder K W, Denissov S, Pijnappel W W, van Schaik F M, Varier R A, Baltissen M P, Stunnenberg H G, Mann M, Timmers H T (2007). Selective anchoring of TFIID to nucleosomes by trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 4. Cell, 131(1): 58–69 Vodala S, Abruzzi K C, Rosbash M (2008). The nuclear exosome and adenylation regulate posttranscriptional tethering of yeast GAL genes to the nuclear periphery. Mol Cell, 31(1): 104–113 Vogel M J, Peric-Hupkes D, van Steensel B (2007). Detection of in vivo protein-DNA interactions using DamID in mammalian cells. Nat Protoc, 2(6): 1467–1478 Williams R R, Azuara V, Perry P, Sauer S, Dvorkina M, Jørgensen H, Roix J, McQueen P, Misteli T, Merkenschlager M, Fisher A G (2006). Neural induction promotes large-scale chromatin reorganisation of the Mash1 locus. J Cell Sci, 119(Pt 1): 132–140 Wu F, Yao J (2013). Spatial compartmentalization at the nuclear periphery characterized by genome-wide mapping. BMC Genomics, 14(1): 591 Xing Y, Johnson C V, Moen P T Jr, McNeil J A, Lawrence J (1995). Nonrandom gene organization: structural arrangements of specific pre-mRNA transcription and splicing with SC-35 domains. J Cell Biol, 131(6 Pt 2): 1635–1647 Yao J, Fetter R D, Hu P, Betzig E, Tjian R (2011). Subnuclear segregation of genes and core promoter factors in myogenesis. Genes Dev, 25(6): 569–580 Zink D, Amaral M D, Englmann A, Lang S, Clarke L A, Rudolph C, Alt F, Luther K, Braz C, Sadoni N, Rosenecker J, Schindelhauer D (2004). Transcription-dependent spatial arrangements of CFTR and adjacent genes in human cell nuclei. J Cell Biol, 166(6): 815–825 Zullo J M, Demarco I A, Piqué-Regi R, Gaffney D J, Epstein C B, Spooner C J, Luperchio T R, Bernstein B E, Pritchard J K, Reddy K L, Singh H (2012). DNA sequence-dependent compartmentalization and silencing of chromatin at the nuclear lamina. Cell, 149(7): 1474–1487