Envisioning sustainable water futures in a transdisciplinary learning process: combining normative, explorative, and participatory scenario approaches

Sustainability Science - Tập 9 - Trang 463-481 - 2013
Flurina Schneider1, Stephan Rist1
1Centre for Development and Environment (CDE) and Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Tóm tắt

Competing water demands for household consumption as well as the production of food, energy, and other uses pose challenges for water supply and sustainable development in many parts of the world. Designing creative strategies and learning processes for sustainable water governance is thus of prime importance. While this need is uncontested, suitable approaches still have to be found. In this article we present and evaluate a conceptual approach to scenario building aimed at transdisciplinary learning for sustainable water governance. The approach combines normative, explorative, and participatory scenario elements. This combination allows for adequate consideration of stakeholders’ and scientists’ systems, target, and transformation knowledge. Application of the approach in the MontanAqua project in the Swiss Alps confirmed its high potential for co-producing new knowledge and establishing a meaningful and deliberative dialogue between all actors involved. The iterative and combined approach ensured that stakeholders’ knowledge was adequately captured, fed into scientific analysis, and brought back to stakeholders in several cycles, thereby facilitating learning and co-production of new knowledge relevant for both stakeholders and scientists. However, the approach also revealed a number of constraints, including the enormous flexibility required of stakeholders and scientists in order for them to truly engage in the co-production of new knowledge. Overall, the study showed that shifts from strategic to communicative action are possible in an environment of mutual trust. This ultimately depends on creating conditions of interaction that place scientists’ and stakeholders’ knowledge on an equal footing.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aeberhard A, Rist S (2009) Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge in the development of organic agriculture in Switzerland. Ecol Econ 68:1171–1181 Alcamo J (2008) Developments in integrated environmental assessment. In: Joseph A (ed) The SAS approach: combining qualitative and quantitative knowledge in environmental scenarios. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 123–150 Alroe HF, Noe E (2010) Multiperspectival science and stakeholder involvement: beyond transdisciplinary integration and consensus. In: Darnhofer I, Grötzer M (eds), Building sustainable rural futures. Proceedings of the 9th European IFSA Symposium 4–7 July 2010, Vienna (Austria), pp 527–533 Beniston M, Stoffel M, Hill M (2011) Impacts of climatic change on water and natural hazards in the Alps: can current water governance cope with future challenges? Examples from the European “ACQWA” project. Environ Sci Policy 14:734–743 Bonriposi M (2013) Analyse systémique et prospective des usages de l’eau dans la region de Crans-Montana-Sierre (Suisse). Thèse de doctorat. Université de Lausanne, Institut de Géographie et Durabilité, Géovisions Checkland P, Holwell S (1998) Action research: its nature and validity. Syst Pract Act Res 11(1):9–21 Cosgrove CE, Cosgrove WJ (2012) The United Nations World Water Development Report–No 4. The dynamics of global water futures: driving forces 2011–2050, vol 2. UNESCO Daniell KA, White I, Ferrand N, Ribarova IS, Coad P, Rougier J-E, Hare M, Jones NA, Popova A, Rollin P, Perez P, Burn S (2010) Co-engineering participatory water management processes: theory and insights from Australian and Bulgarian interventions. Ecol Society 15(4):11. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art11/. Accessed on 26 August 2013 Du Toit DR, Biggs H, Pollard S (2011) The potential role of mental model methodologies in multistakeholder negotiations: integrated water resources management in South Africa. Ecol Soc 16(3):21 Elden M, Levin M (1991) Cogenerative learning: bringing participation into action research. In: Whyte WF (ed) Participatory action research. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, pp 127–142 Flick U (2005) Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Einfuehrung. Reinbek bei Hamburg, Rowohlt Taschenbuch Forsyth S, Brooks DB (2011) Applying water soft path analysis in an agricultural region of Canada. Water Int 36:894–907 Franks T, Cleaver F (2009) Analysing water governance: a tool for sustainability? Proc Inst Civil Eng Eng Sustain 162:207–213 GEF (2013) TDA/SAP Methodology. Identify, quantify, and set priorities for environmental transboundary problems. Web-version http://manuals.iwlern.net/tda-sap-methodology Accessed on 26 August 2013 Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London Harmancioglu NB, Fedra K, Barbaros F (2008) Analysis for sustainability in management of water scarce basins: the case of the Gediz River Basin in Turkey. Desalination 226:175–182 Hartmuth G, Huber K, Rink D (2008) Operationalization and contextualization of sustainability at the local level. Sustain Dev 16:261–270 Hirsch Hadorn G, Bradley D, Pohl C, Rist S, Wiesmann U (2006) Implications of transdisciplinarity for sustainability research. Ecol Econ 60:119–128 ISSKA (2010) Bassins versants karstiques et modèles 3D autour de Montana. Version provisoire. Internal report Kim J, Furumai H (2012) Assessment of rainwater availability by building type and water use through GIS-based scenario analysis. Water Resour Manage 26:1499–1511 Kok K, van Vliet M, Bärlund I, Dubel A, Sendzimir J (2011) Combining participative backcasting and exploratory scenario development: experiences from the SCENES project. Technol Forecast Soc Change 78:835–851 Kuylenstierna JL, Björklund G, Najlis P (1997) Sustainable water future with global implications: everyone’s responsibility. Nat Resour Forum 21:181–190 Lawhon M, Murphy JT (2012) Socio-technical regimes and sustainability transitions: insights from political ecology. Prog Hum Geogr 36:354–378 Lienert J, Monstadt J, Truffer B (2005) Future scenarios for a sustainable water sector: a case study from Switzerland. Environ Sci Technol 40:436–442 March H, Therond O, Leenhardt D (2012) Water futures: reviewing water-scenario analyses through an original interpretative framework. Ecol Econ 82:126–137 Mobjörk M (2010) Consulting versus participatory transdisciplinarity: a refined classification of transdisciplinary research. Futures 42:866–873 Moran D, MacLeod M, McVittie A, Lago M, Oglethorpe D (2007) Dynamics of water use in Scotland. Water Environ J 21:241–251 Moriarty PB, Batchelor CH, Laban P, Fahmy H (2010) Developing a practical approach to ‘light IWRM’ in the Middle East. Water Altern 3:122–136 Mylopoulos N, Kolokytha E, Loukas A, Mylopoulos Y (2012) Agricultural and water resources development in Thessaly, Greece in the framework of new European Union policies. Int J River Basin Manag 7:73–89 Nassauer JI, Corry RC (2004) Using normative scenarios in landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 19:343–356 Niklaus M (2012) An object-oriented approach for mapping current land use/land cover in the study area Crans-Montana-Sierre, Valais. Masterarbeit der Universität Bern, Schweiz Nowotny H (2000) Re-thinking science: from reliable to socially robust knowledge. In: Weiss M (ed) Jahrbuch 2000 des Collgeium Helveticum der ETH Zürich. vdf, Zürich, pp 221–244 Nowotny H, Gibbons M, Scott P (2001) Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Polity, Cambridge Palomo I, Marín-López B, López-Santiago C, Montes C (2011) Participatory scenario planning for protected areas management under the ecosystem services framework: the Doñana social-ecological system in Southwestern Spain. Ecol Soc 16(1):23. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss11/art23/ Pohl C, Hirsch Hadorn G (2007) Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. Oekom, Munich Pollard S, Du Toit D (2008) Integrated water resource management in complex systems: how the catchment management strategies seek to achieve sustainability and equity in water resources in South Africa. Water SA (IWRM Special Edition) 34(6). Available at http://www.wrc.org.za Ray C (1999) Endogenous development in the era of reflexive modernity. J Rural Stud 15(3):257–267 Reed MS (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biol Conserv 141:2417–2431 Renner R, Schneider F, Hohenwallner D, Kopeinig C, Kruse S, Lienert J, Link S, Muhar S (2013) Meeting the challenges of transdisciplinary knowledge production for sustainable water governance. Mt Res Dev 33(3):234–247 Reynard E (2000) Gestion patrimoniale et intégrée des ressources en eau dans les stations touristiques de montagne. Les cas de Crans-Montana-Aminona et Nendaz (Valais). Thèse présentée à la Faculté des Lettres de l’Université de Lausanne Reynard E, Bonriposi M (2012) Water use management in dry mountains of Switzerland: the case of Crans-Montana-Sierre area. In: Nemenyi M, Heil B (eds) The impact of urbanization, industrial, agricultural and forest technologies on the natural environment. Nyugat-Magyarorszagi Egytem Sopron, Hungary, pp 281–301 Rinaudo JD, Montginoul M, Varanda M, Bento S (2012) Envisioning innovative groundwater regulation policies through scenario workshops in France and Portugal. Irrigation Drainage 61:65–74 Rist S, Chiddambaranathan M, Escobar C, Wiesmann U (2006) “It was hard to come to mutual understanding…” Multidimensionality of social learning processes in natural resource use in India, Africa and Latin America. J Syst Pract Action Res 19:219–237 Rist S, Chiddambaranathan M, Escobar C, Wiesmann U, Zimmermann A (2007) Moving from sustainable management to sustainable governance of natural resources: the role of social learning processes in rural India, Bolivia and Mali. J Rural Stud 23:23–37 Roux DJ, Rogers KH, Biggs HC, Ashton PJ, Sergeant A (2006) Bridging the science-management divide: moving from unidirectional knowledge transfer to knowledge interfacing and sharing. Ecol Soc 11: Article 4. Available at: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss11/art14/ Schaldach R, Koch J, Aus der Beek T, Kynast E, Flörke M (2012) Current and future irrigation water requirements in pan-Europe: an integrated analysis of socio-economic and climate scenarios. Glob Planet Change 94–95:33–45 Schneider F (2011) Approaching water stress in the Alps: Transdisciplinary co-production of systems, target and transformation knowledge. In: Borsdorf A, Stötter J, Veulliet E (eds) Managing Alpine Future II—Inspire and drive sustainable mountain regions. Proceedings of the Innsbruck Conference, November 21–23, 2011. (=IGF-Forschungsberichte 4). Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Vienna Schneider F, Fry P, Ledermann T, Rist S (2009) Social learning processes in Swiss soil protection—The ‘From Farmer—To Farmer’ project. Hum Ecol 37:475–489 Smits S, Pollard S, Du Toit D, Butterworth J, Moriarty P (2004) Modelling scenarios for water resources management in the Sand River Catchment, South Africa (WHIRL Project working paper; no. 8). NRI, Chatham, UK Soliva R (2007) Agricultural decline, landscape change, and outmigration: debating the sustainability of three scenarios for a Swiss mountain region. Mt Res Develop 27:124–129 Soliva R, Ronningen K, Bella I, Bezak P, Cooper Tamsin, Egil Flo B, Marty P, Potter C (2008) Envisioning upland futures: stakeholder responses to scenarios Europe’s mountain landscapes. J Rural Stud 24:56–71 Strauss AL, Corbin JM (1997) Grounded theory in practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks Swart RJ, Raskin P, Robinson J (2004) The problem of the future: sustainability science and scenario analysis. Glob Environ Change 14:137–146 Vinck D (1999) Les objets intermédiaires dans les réseaux de coopération scientifique. Contribution à la prise en compte des objets dans les dynamiques sociales. Rev Fr Sociol 2:385–414 Viviroli D, Archer DR, Buytaert W, Fowler HJ, Greenwood GB, Hamlet AF, Huang Y, Koboltschnig G, Litaor MI, Lopez-Moreno JI, Lorentz S, Schädler B, Schreier H, Schwaiger K, Vuille M, Woods R (2011) Climate change and mountain water resources: overview and recommendations for research, management and policy. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:471–504 Voinesco A (2012) Le glacier de la Plaine-Morte: épaisseur de glace et bilan de masse. Msc Thesis, University of Fribourg Walz A, Lardelli C, Behrendt H, Grêt-Regamey A, Lundström C, Kytzia S, Bebi P (2007) Participatory scenario analysis for integrated regional modelling. Landsc Urban Plan 81:114 WCED (1987) Report of the World commission on environment and development: our common future. http://www.un-documents.net/wced-ocf.htm. Accessed 28 January 2013 Wiek A, Larson K (2012) Water, people, and sustainability—a systems framework for analyzing and assessing water governance regimes. Water Resour Manage 26:3153–3171 Wollenberg E, Edmunds D, Buck L (2000) Using scenarios to make decisions about the future: anticipatory learning for the adaptive co-management of community forests. Landsc Urban Plan 47:65