Asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation methods to characterize submicron particles: application to carbon-based aggregates and nanoplastics

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 409 - Trang 6761-6769 - 2017
Julien Gigault1, Hind El Hadri2, Stéphanie Reynaud2, Elise Deniau2, Bruno Grassl2
1Laboratoire Géosciences Rennes, UMR6118, CNRS – Université de Rennes 1, Rennes, France
2Institut des Sciences Analytiques et de Physico-chimie pour l’Environnement et les Matériaux, IPREM, UMR 5254, CNRS—Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, Pau, France

Tóm tắt

In the last 10 years, asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation (AF4) has been one of the most promising approaches to characterize colloidal particles. Nevertheless, despite its potentialities, it is still considered a complex technique to set up, and the theory is difficult to apply for the characterization of complex samples containing submicron particles and nanoparticles. In the present work, we developed and propose a simple analytical strategy to rapidly determine the presence of several submicron populations in an unknown sample with one programmed AF4 method. To illustrate this method, we analyzed polystyrene particles and fullerene aggregates of size covering the whole colloidal size distribution. A global and fast AF4 method (method O) allowed us to screen the presence of particles with size ranging from 1 to 800 nm. By examination of the fractionating power F d, as proposed in the literature, convenient fractionation resolution was obtained for size ranging from 10 to 400 nm. The global F d values, as well as the steric inversion diameter, for the whole colloidal size distribution correspond to the predicted values obtained by model studies. On the basis of this method and without the channel components or mobile phase composition being changed, four isocratic subfraction methods were performed to achieve further high-resolution separation as a function of different size classes: 10–100 nm, 100–200 nm, 200–450 nm, and 450–800 nm in diameter. Finally, all the methods developed were applied in characterization of nanoplastics, which has received great attention in recent years.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Hassellöv M, Kaegi R. Analysis and characterization of manufactured nanoparticles in aquatic environments. In: Lead JL, Smith E, editors. Environmental and human health impacts of nanotechnology. Chichester: Wiley; 2009. p. 211–66. Tuoriniemi J, Johnsson ACJH, Holmberg JP, Gustafsson S, Gallego-Urrea JA, Olsson E, et al. Intermethod comparison of the particle size distributions of colloidal silica nanoparticles. Sci Technol Adv Mater. 2014;15:035009. Fedotov PS, Vanifatova NG, Shkinev VM, Spivakov BY. Fractionation and characterization of nano- and microparticles in liquid media. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2011;400:1787–804. Hassellöv M, Readman JW, Ranville JF, Tiede K. Nanoparticle analysis and characterization methodologies in environmental risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology. 2008;17:344–61. Tiede K, Boxall ABA, Tear SP, Lewis J, David H, Hassellov M. Detection and characterization of engineered nanoparticles in food and the environment. Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2008;25:795–821. Hotze EM, Phenrat T, Lowry GV. Nanoparticle aggregation: challenges to understanding transport and reactivity in the environment. J Environ Qual. 2010;39:1909–24. Petosa AR, Jaisi DP, Quevedo IR, Elimelech M, Tufenkji N. Aggregation and deposition of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environments: role of physicochemical interactions. Environ Sci Technol. 2010;44:6532–49. Andreev SM, Purgina DD, Bashkatova EN, Garshev AV, Maerle AV, Khaitov MR. Facile preparation of aqueous fullerene C60 nanodispersions. Nanotechnol Russ. 2014;9:369–79. Jiang J, Oberdörster G, Biswas P. Characterization of size, surface charge, and agglomeration state of nanoparticle dispersions for toxicological studies. J Nanopart Res. 2009;11:77–89. Dai M, Martin J-M, Cauwet G. The significant role of colloids in the transport and transformation of organic carbon and associated trace metals (Cd, Cu and Ni) in the Rhône delta (France). Mar Chem. 1995;51:159–75. Pettibone JM, Gigault J, Hackley VA. Discriminating the states of matter in metallic nanoparticle transformations: what are we missing? ACS Nano. 2014;7:2491–9. Hou WC, Jafvert CT. Photochemical transformation of aqueous C clusters in sunlight. Environ Sci Technol. 2009;43:362–7. Baalousha M, Lead JR. Rationalizing nanomaterial sizes measured by atomic force microscopy, flow field-flow fractionation, and dynamic light scattering: sample preparation, polydispersity, and particle structure. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:6134–42. Ross HF. Particle size analysis by dynamic light scattering. Food Res Int. 1994;27:195–8. Hackley VA, Clogston JD. Measuring the size of nanoparticles in aqueous media using batch-mode dynamic light scattering. NIST special publication 1200-6. National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg; 2007. Baalousha M, Stolpe B, Lead JR. Flow field-flow fractionation for the analysis and characterization of natural colloids and manufactured nanoparticles in environmental systems: a critical review. J Chromatogr A. 2011;1218:4078–103. Baalousha M, Lead JR. Size fractionation and characterization of natural aquatic colloids and nanoparticles. Sci Total Environ. 2007;386:93–102. Lead JR, Wilkinson KJ. Aquatic colloids and nanoparticles: current knowledge and future trends. Environ Chem. 2006;3:159–71. Lespes G, Gigault J. Hyphenated analytical techniques for multidimensional characterisation of submicron particles: a review. Anal Chim Acta. 2011;692:26–41. Williams PS. Fractionating power and outlet stream polydispersity in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation. Part I: isocratic operation. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2016;408:3247–63. Williams PS. Fractionating power and outlet stream polydispersity in asymmetrical flow field-flow fractionation. Part II: programmed operation. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017;409:317–34. Gigault J, Pettibone JM, Schmitt C, Hackley VA. Rational strategy for characterization of nanoscale particles by asymmetric-flow field flow fractionation: a tutorial. Anal Chim Acta. 2014;809:9–24. Andersson M, Wittgren B, Wahlund K-G. Accuracy in multiangle light scattering measurements for molar mass and radius estimations. Model calculations and experiments. Anal Chem. 2003;75:4279–91. Giddings JC, Williams PS, Beckett R. Fractionating power in programmed field-flow fractionation: exponential sedimentation field decay. Anal Chem. 1987;59:28–37. Brant J, Lecoanet H, Wiesner MR. Aggregation and deposition characteristics of fullerene nanoparticles in aqueous systems. J Nanopart Res. 2015;7:545–53. Gigault J, Grassl B. Improving the understanding of fullerene (nC60) aggregate structures: fractal dimension characterization by static light scattering coupled to asymmetrical flow field flow fractionation. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2017;502:193–200. Bendixen N, Losert S, Adlhart C, Lattuada M, Ulrich A. Membrane-particle interactions in an asymmetric flow field flow fractionation channel studied with titanium dioxide nanoparticles. J Chromatogr A. 2014;1334:92–100. Du Q, Schimpf ME. Correction for particle–wall interactions in the separation of colloids by flow field-flow fractionation. Anal Chem. 2002;74:2478–85. Baalousha M, Yang Y, Vance ME, Colman BP, McNeal S, Xu J, et al. Outdoor urban nanomaterials: the emergence of a new, integrated, and critical field of study. Sci Total Environ. 2016;557–558:740–53. Andrady AL. Microplastics in the marine environment. Mar Pollut Bull. 2011;62:1596–605. Eerkes-Medrano D, Thompson RC, Aldridge DC. Microplastics in freshwater systems: a review of the emerging threats, identification of knowledge gaps and prioritisation of research needs. Water Res. 2015;75:63–82. Hidalgo-Ruz V, Gutow L, Thompson RC, Thiel M. Microplastics in the marine environment: a review of the methods used for identification and quantification. Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:3060–75. Gigault J, Pedrono B, Maxit B, Halle AT. Marine plastic litter: the unanalyzed nano-fraction. Environ Sci Nano. 2016;3:346–50.