When do older adults turn to the internet for health information? Findings from the wisconsin longitudinal study
Tóm tắt
BACKGROUND: Understanding how and when patients use nonphysician sources of health information is important to facilitate shared decision making within provider outpatient visits. However, little is known about which older adults seek health information on the internet or when.
OBJECTIVE: To determine how patient characteristics are related to seeking health information online and to the timing of these searches in relation to doctor visits.
PARTICIPANTS: Six thousand two hundred and seventy-nine respondents (aged 63 to 66 years) who completed the 2004 round of phone and mail surveys (70% response) as part of the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study Graduate Sample.
MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported use of the internet to search for health information and timing of use.
RESULTS: One-third of respondents had searched online for information about their own health or health care. Half of these searched for health information unrelated to their last doctor visit, while 1/3 searched after a visit, and 1/6 searched before. Among respondents with internet access at home or work, years of education (odds ratio [OR]=1.09, confidence interval [CI]=1.06 to 1.13) and openness-to-experience (OR=1.26, CI=1.16 to 1.36) were positively associated with searching online for health information irrespective of timing in relation to doctor visits. Compared with those who had never sought health information online, sicker individuals (especially those with cancer, OR=1.51, CI=1.14 to 1.99) were more likely to seek information online after a doctor visit. Attitudinal and personality factors were related to seeking health information online before or unrelated to a visit.
CONCLUSIONS: There are important differences in the timing of online health information searches by psychological and health characteristics among older adults with internet access.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Jenkins V, Fallowfield L, Saul J. Information needs of patients with cancer: results from a large study in UK cancer centres. Br J Cancer. 2001;84:48–51.
Benbassat J, Pilpel D, Tidhar M. Patients’ preferences for participation in clinical decision making: a review of published surveys. Ann Behav Med. 1998;24:81–8.
Woolf SH, Chan EC, Harris R, et al. Promoting informed choice: transforming health care to dispense knowledge for decision making. Ann Intern Med. 2005;143:293–300.
McNutt RA. Shared medical decision making: problems, process, progress. JAMA. 2004;292:2516–8.
Institute of Medicine. Improving Medical Education: Enhancing the Behavioral and Social Science Content of Medical School Curricula. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2004.
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Soc Sci Med. 1997;44:681–92.
Stevenson FA, Barry CA, Britten N, Barber N, Bradley CP. Doctorpatient communication about drugs: the evidence for shared decision making. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:829–40.
Cotten SR, Gupta SS. Characteristics of online and offline health information seekers and factors that discriminate between them. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:1795–806.
Wagner TH, Baker LC, Bundorf MK, Singer S. Use of the internet for health information by the chronically ill. Prev Chronic Dis. 2004;1:A13.
Czaja R, Manfredi C, Price J. The determinants and consequences of information seeking among cancer patients. J Health Commun. 2003;8:529–62.
Peterson MW, Fretz PC. Patient use of the internet for information in a lung cancer clinic. Chest. 2003;123:452–7.
Shuyler KS, Knight KM. What are patients seeking when they turn to the Internet? Qualitative content analysis of questions asked by visitors to an orthopaedics Web site. Med Internet Res. 2003;5:e24.
Fox S. Health Information Online. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2005.
Pautler SE, Tan JK, Dugas GR, et al. Use of the internet for self-education by patients with prostate cancer. Urology. 2001;57:230–3.
Baker L, Wagner TH, Singer S, Bundorf MK. Use of the internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. JAMA. 2003;289:2400–6.
Ziebland S, Chapple A, Dumelow C, Evans J, Prinjha S, Rozmovits L. How the internet affects patients’ experience of cancer: a qualitative study. BMJ. 2004;328:564.
Grant RW, Cagliero E, Chueh HC, Meigs JB. Internet use among primary care patients with type 2 diabetes: the generation and education gap. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:470–3.
Fox S. Older Americans and the Internet. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2004.
Diaz JA, Griffith RA, Ng JJ, Reinert SE, Friedmann PD, Moulton AW. Patients’ use of the Internet for medical information. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17:180–5.
Wagner TH, Bundorf MK, Singer SJ, Baker LC. Free internet access, the digital divide, and health information. Med Care. 2005;43:415–20.
Houston TK, Allison JJ. Users of Internet health information: differences by health status. J Med Internet Res. 2002;4:E7.
Meischke H, Eisenberg M, Rowe S, Cagle A. Do older adults use the Internet for information on heart attacks? Results from a survey of seniors in King County, Washington. Heart Lung. 2005;34:3–12.
Adams N, Stubbs D, Woods V. Psychological barriers to Internet usage among older adults in the UK. Med Inform Internet Med. 2005;30:3–17.
Mead N, Varnam R, Rogers A, Roland M. What predicts patients’ interest in the Internet as a health resource in primary care in England? J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003;8:33–9.
Rogers A, Mead N. More than technology and access: primary care patients’ views on the use and non-use of health information in the Internet age. Health Soc Care Community. 2004;12:102–110.
Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. JAMA. 2002;287:2691–700.
Wisconsin Longitudinal Study 1957–2004. http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/wlsresearch.
Henmon VAC, Nelson MJ. Henmon-Nelson Tests of Mental Ability, High School Examination—Grades 7 to 12—Forms A, B, and C. Teacher’s Manual. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1946.
Henmon VAC, Nelson MJ. The Henmon-Nelson Tests of Mental Ability. Manual for Administration. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company; 1954.
Seltzer MM, Floyd F, Greenberg J, Lounds J, Lindstromm M, Hong J. Life course impacts of mild intellectual deficits. Am J Ment Retard. 2005;110:451–68.
Ware J Jr.,Kosinaki M, Keller SD. A 12-Item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–33.
Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. SF-12: How To Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1995.
Duke University Center for the Study of Aging and Human Development. Multidimensional Functional Assessment: The OARS Methodology. Durham, NC: Duke University: 1978.
McCrae RR, Costa PT Jr. Personality in Adulthood: A Five-Factor Perspective. 2nd edn. New York: Guilford Press; 2003.
Srivastava S, John OP, Gosling SD, Potter J. Development of personality in early and middle adulthood: set like plaster or persistent change? J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84:1041–53.
Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model. Soc Sci Med. 1999;49:651–61.
Ende J, Kazis L, Ash A, Moskowitz MA. Measuring patients’ desire for autonomy: decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients. J Gen Intern Med. 1989;4:23–30.
Krantz DS, Baum A, Wideman M. Assessment of preferences for self-treatment and information in health care. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980;39:977–90.
SAS Institute. SAS Statistical Software, 9.1 edn. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2005.
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software, 9.0 edn. College Station, TX: Stata Statistical Software; 2005.
Number of “cyberchondriacs”—U.S. adults who go online for health information—increases to estimated 117 million. Harris Poll No. 54 2005;5.
Winick BJ. Foreword: planning for the future through advance directive instruments. Psychol Public Policy Law. 1998;4:579–609.
Gaston CM, Mitchell G. Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer; a systematic review. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61:2252–64.
Torke AM, Corbie-Smith GM, Branch WT Jr. African American patients’ perspectives on medical decision making. Arch Intern Med. 2004;164:525–30.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. Educational Attainment in the United States: March 2000. Series P-20, No. 536. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 2000.
Blackhall LJ, Murphy ST, Frank G, Michel V, Azen S. Ethnicity and attitudes toward patient autonomy. JAMA. 1995;274:820–5.
Sudman S, Bradburn NM. Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design. San Francisco, CA: Josecy-Bass Inc.; 1982.
Bessel TL, McDonald S, Silagy CA, Anderson JN, Hiller JE, Sansom LN. Do Internet interventions for consumers cause more harm than good? A systematic review. Health Expect. 2002;5:28–37.
Diaz JA, Sciamanna CN, Evangelou E, Stamp MJ, Ferguson T. Brief report: what types of Internet guidance do patients want from their physicians? J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:683–5.