Comparison of Doppler Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Angiographic Techniques and Catheter Angiography in Evaluation of Carotid Stenosis

Clinical Radiology - Tập 55 - Trang 912-920 - 2000
MARIA B. JOHNSON1, IAIN D. WILKINSON1, JOHN WATTAM2, GRAHAM S. VENABLES3, PAUL D. GRIFFITHS1
1Section of Academic Radiology, University of Sheffield
2Department of Radiology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital
3Department of Neurology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, U.K.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Barnelt, H, Stein, B, Mohr, J, Yatsu, F, Stroke: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management, 1986, 3, 271 Bonita, 1992, Epidemiology of stroke, Lancet, 339, 342, 10.1016/0140-6736(92)91658-U Bonita, 1993, Explaining stroke mortality trends, Lancet, 341, 1511 Gillard, JH, MR spectroscopic imaging of acute stroke. MD Thesis, 1996 Underwood, JC, General and Systemic Pathology, 1996, 310, 316 1991, N Engl J Med, 325, 445, 10.1056/NEJM199108153250701 1991, Lancet, 337, 1235, 10.1016/0140-6736(91)92916-P Worthy, 1997, The role of duplex sonography and angiography in investigation of carotid artery disease, Neuroradiology, 39, 122, 10.1007/s002340050378 Gaines, PA, Hodgson, TJ, Aldoori, MI, Beard, JD, Salmasi, A-M, Strano, A. Angiology in Practice, 1996 Anderson, 1992, Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by MR angiography. Comparison with X-ray angiography and colour-coded doppler ultrasound, Am J Neuroradiol, 13, 989 Hankey, 1991, The role of imaging in the management of cerebral and ocular ischaemia, Neuroradiology, 33, 381, 10.1007/BF00598608 Derdeyn, 1995, Role of Doppler ultrasound in screening for carotid atherosclerosis, Radiology, 197, 635, 10.1148/radiology.197.3.7480731 Mittl, 1994, Blinded-reader comparison of MRA and duplex ultrasonography for carotid artery bifurcation stenosis, Stroke, 25, 4, 10.1161/01.STR.25.1.4 Rasanen, 1999, Mild carotid artery atherosclerosis. Assessment by 3-dimensional TOF MRA, with reference to intravascular US imaging and CA, Stroke, 30, 827, 10.1161/01.STR.30.4.827 Patel, 1995, Preoperative assessment of the carotid bifurcation. Can MRA and duplex ultrasonography replace contrast arteriography, Stroke, 26, 1753, 10.1161/01.STR.26.10.1753 Levy, 1996, Arterial-phase three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid artery, Am J Roentgenol, 167, 211, 10.2214/ajr.167.1.8659374 Altman, DG, Practical Statistics for Medical Research, 1991, 403, 405 Gardner, 1989, Statistics with confidence intervals and statistical guidelines, Brit Med J, 28 Rothwell, 1999, Prediction of benefit from carotid endarterectomy in individual patients: a risk modelling study, Lancet, 353, 2105, 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)11415-0 1998, Lancet, 351, 1379, 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)09292-1 Young, 1995, Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography, duplex ultrasound, and digital subtraction angiography in assessment of extracranial internal carotid artery stenosis, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiat, 59, 225 Remonda, 1998, Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography — preliminary study, Radiology, 209, 95, 10.1148/radiology.209.1.9769818 Contrast-enhanced Carotid MR Angiography Study Group, Contrast-enhanced carotid MR angiography trial — preliminary results, 1999, 96 Barreau, X, Berge, J, Delmer, O, Dousset, V, Caille, JM, Three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of carotid arteries and arteriography. A comparative study, 1999, 264