The Social License to Operate
Journal of Business Ethics - 2016
Tóm tắt
This article proposes a way to zoom in on the concept of the social license to operate (SLO) from the broader normative perspective of contractarianism. An SLO can be defined as a contractarian basis for the legitimacy of a company’s specific activity or project. “SLO”, as a fashionable expression, has its origins in business practice. From a normative viewpoint, the concept is closely related to social contract theory, and, as such, it has a political dimension. After outlining the contractarian normative background to the SLO, we will show how academic concepts such as legitimacy and stakeholder management have a tendency to provide the intellectual underpinning for the business case for securing an SLO. While business case perspectives on the SLO may well be in line with the use of the term in business practice, we will highlight certain difficulties and ambiguities related to the instrumental use of the expression. In the final section, we briefly introduce the articles of this Special Issue to the reader and explain how they relate to the topic.
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Aldrich, H. E., & Fiol, M. C. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19, 645–670.
Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1, 177–194.
Baba, S., & Raufflet, E. (2014). Managing relational legacies: Lessons from British Columbia, Canada. Administrative Sciences, 4, 15–34.
Banerjee, S. B. (2010). Governing the global corporation: A critical perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20(2), 265–274.
Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 122–136.
Black, L. (2013). The social license to operate: Your management framework for complex times. Oxford: Do Sustainability [Sedition Publishing, Ltd.].
Boutilier, R. G., Black, L., & Thomson, I. (2012). From metaphor to management tool: How the social license to operate can stabilise the socio-political environment for business. In International mine management 2012 proceedings (pp. 227–237). Melbourne: Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy.
Bowen, F., Newenham-Kahindi, A., & Herremans, I. (2010). When suits meet roots: The antecedents and consequences of community engagement strategy. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(2), 297–318.
Buhmann, K. (2016). Public regulators and CSR: The ‘Social Licence to Operate’ in recent united nations instruments on business and human rights and the juridification of CSR. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2869-9.
Castello, I., & Lozano, J. M. (2011). Searching for new forms of legitimacy through corporate responsibility rhetoric. Journal of Business Ethics, 100, 11–29.
Claasen, C., & Roloff, J. (2012). The link between responsibility and legitimacy: The case of De Beers in Namibia. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 379–398.
Coumans, C. (2011). Occupying spaces created by conflict: Anthropologists, development NGOs, responsible investment, and mining: with CA comment by Stuart Kirsch. Current Anthropology, S3, S29–S43.
Cui, J., Jo, H., & Velasquez, M. (2016). Community religion, employees, and the social license to operate. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2865-0.
Davis, R., & Franks, D. (2014). Costs of company–community conflict in the extractive sector. In Corporate social responsibility initiative report no. 66. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Kennedy School.
Deegan, C., & Shelly, M. (2014). Corporate social responsibilities: Alternative perspectives about the need to legislate. Journal of Business Ethics, 121, 499–526.
Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. (1999). Ties that bind: A social contract approach to business ethics. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behaviour. Pacific Sociological Review, 18, 122–136.
Dworkin, R. (1977). Taking rights seriously. Cambridge (Ma.): Harvard University Press.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wickes, A. C., Parmar, B. L., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory. The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gauthier, D. (1986). Morals by agreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Gond, J. P., Palazzo, G., & Basu, K. (2009). Reconsidering instrumental corporate social responsibility through the Mafia Metaphor. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19, 57–85.
Graafland, J. J. (2002). Profits and principles: Four perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 35(4), 293–305.
Gunningham, N., Kagan, R. A., & Thornton, D. (2004). Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law & Social Inquiry, 29(2), 307–341.
Hampton, J. (1993). Contractarianism. In R. Goodin & P. Pettit (Eds.), A companion to contemporary political philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hennchen, E. (2015). Royal dutch shell in Nigeria: Where do responsibilities end? Journal of Business Ethics, 129(1), 1–25.
Hume, D. (1758). Essays. Moral, political and literary. Indianapolis: LibertyClassics. (1985).
Idemudia, U. (2009). Oil extraction and poverty reduction in the Niger Delta: A critical examination of partnership initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(Supplement 1), 91–116.
International Finance Corporation. (2010). Strategic community investment: A good practice handbook for companies doing business in emerging markets. Retrieved July 25, 2015, from http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/Topics_Ext_Content/IFC_External_Corporate_Site/IFC+Sustainability/Learning+and+Adapting/Knowledge+Products/Publications/
Jones, T. M. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 404–437.
Kagan, R. A., Gunningham, N., & Thornton, D. (2003). Explaining corporate environmental performance: How does regulation matter? Law & Society Review, 37(1), 51–90.
Kant, I. (1788). Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp. (1996).
Kant, I. (1793). Über den Gemeinspruch: Das mag in der Theorie richtig sein, taugt aber nicht für die Praxis. In I. Kant, Kleinere Schriften zur Geschichtphilosophie, Ethik und Politik [ed.by K. Vorländer]. Hamburg: Felix Meiner.
Koivurova, T., Masloboev, V., Hossain, K., Nygaard, V., Petrétei, A., & Vinogradova, S. (2015). Legal protection of sami traditional livelihoods from the adverse impacts of mining: A comparison of the level of protection enjoyed by sami in their four home states. Arctic Review on Law and Politics, 6(1). Retrieved July 25, 2015, from http://arcticreview.no/index.php/arctic/article/view/76
Luetge, C., Armbrüster, T., & Müller, J. (2016). Order ethics: Bridging the gap between contractarianism and business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2977-6.
Lynch-Wood, G., & Williamson, D. (2007). The social licence as a form of regulation for small and medium enterprises. Journal of Law and Society, 34(3), 321–341.
Melé, D., & Armengou, J. (2016). Moral legitimacy in controversial projects and Its relationship with social license to operate: A case study. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2866-z.
Matejek, S., & Gössling, T. (2014). Beyond legitimacy: A case study in BP’s ‘‘Green Lashing’’. Journal of Business Ethics, 120, 571–584.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.
Meyer, J., & Scott, R. (1983). Centralization and the legitimacy problems of local government. In J. Meyer & R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational environment: Rituals and rationality (pp. 199–216). Newbury Park: Sage.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
Moffat, K., & Zhang, A. (2014). The paths to social licence to operate: An integrative model explaining community acceptance of mining. Resources Policy, 39, 61–70.
Morrison, John. (2014). The social license to operate. How to keep your organization legitimate. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Murillo, D., & Vallentin, S. (2016). The business school’s right to operate: Responsibilization and resistance. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2872-1.
Néron P.-Y. (2016). Rethinking the ethics of corporate political activities in a post-citizens united era: Political equality, corporate citizenship, and market failures. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2867-y.
Nielsen, A. E. (2013). License to operate. In S. O. Idowu, N. Capaldi, L. Zu & A. Das Gupta (Eds.), Encyclopedia of corporate social responsibility (pp. 1585–1591). Berlin: Springer.
O’Donohue, W., & Nelson, L. (2009). The role of ethical values in an expanded psychological contract. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(2), 251–263.
Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation: A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), 71–88.
Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479–502.
Pike, R. (2012). The relevance of social licence to operate for mining companies. In Schroders social license to operate research paper. http://www.schroders.com/staticfiles/schroders/sites/Americas/US%20Institutional%202011/pdfs/Social-Licence-to-Operate.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2015
Prno, J., & Slocombe, D. S. (2012). Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resource Policy, 37, 346–357.
Ruggie, J. (2013). Just business. Multinational corporations and human rights. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Russell, C., Russell, D., & Honea, H. (2016). Corporate social responsibility failures: How do consumers respond to corporate violations of implied social contracts? Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2868-x.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20, 571–610.
Thomson, I., & Boutilier, R. G. (2011). Social license to operate. In P. Darling (Ed.), SME mining engineering handbook (pp. 1779–1796). Littleton, CO: Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration.
Voegtlin, C., Patzer, M., & Scherer, A. G. (2012). Responsible leadership in global business: A new approach to leadership an its multi-level outcomes. Journal of Business Ethics, 105, 1–16.
Waxenberger, B., & Spence, L. (2003). Reinterpretation of a metaphor: From stakes to claims. Strategic Change, 12(5), 239–249.
Wilburn, K. M., & Wilburn, R. (2011). Achieving social license to operate using stakeholder theory. Journal of International Business Ethics, 4(2), 3–16.
Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.
Yates, B., & Horvath, C. (2013). Social license to operate: How to get it, and how to keep it. In Summit working paper. Pacific Energy Summit.
Zandvliet, L., & Anderson, M. B. (2009). Getting it right: Making corporate–community relations work greenleaf publishing limited. UK: Sheffield.