Invited review: Genomic selection in dairy cattle: Progress and challenges

Journal of Dairy Science - Tập 92 - Trang 433-443 - 2009
B.J. Hayes1, P.J. Bowman1, A.J. Chamberlain1, M.E. Goddard1,2
1Biosciences Research Division, Department of Primary Industries Victoria, 1 Park Drive, Bundoora 3083, Australia
2Faculty of Land and Food Resources, University of Melbourne, Parkville 3010, Australia

Tài liệu tham khảo

Boichard, 2002, Implementation of marker-assisted selection in French dairy cattle. Electronic commun Calus, 2008, Accuracy of genomic selection using different methods to define haplotypes, Genetics, 178, 553, 10.1534/genetics.107.080838 Daetwyler, 2007, Inbreeding in genome-wide selection, J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 124, 369, 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00693.x De Roos, 2008, Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle, Genetics, 179, 1503, 10.1534/genetics.107.084301 Dunner, 2003, Haplotype diversity of the myostatin gene among beef cattle breeds, Genet. Sel. Evol., 35, 103, 10.1186/1297-9686-35-1-103 Efron, 2004, Least angle regression, Ann. Statist., 32, 407, 10.1214/009053604000000067 Gianola, 2006, Genomic-assisted prediction of genetic value with semiparametric procedures, Genetics, 173, 1761, 10.1534/genetics.105.049510 Gibson, 1994, Short-term gain at the expense of long-term response with selection of identified loci, 202 Gilmour, 2002 Goddard, 1991, Mapping genes for quantitative traits using linkage disequilibrium, Genet. Sel. Evol., 23, 131s, 10.1186/1297-9686-23-S1-S131 Goddard, 2008, Genomic selection: Prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response, Genetica Goddard, 2007, Genomic selection, J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 124, 323, 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00702.x Grisart, 2004, Genetic and functional confirmation of the causality of the DGAT1 K232A quantitative trait nucleotide in affecting milk yield and composition, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 24, 2398, 10.1073/pnas.0308518100 Habier, 2007, The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values, Genetics, 177, 2389, 10.1534/genetics.107.081190 Harris, 2008, Genomic selection in New Zealand and the implications for national genetic evaluation Hayes, 2001, The distribution of the effects of genes affecting quantitative traits in livestock, Genet. Sel. Evol., 33, 209, 10.1186/1297-9686-33-3-209 Hayes, 2008, Technical note: Prediction of breeding values using marker derived relationship matrices, J. Anim. Sci., 86, 2089, 10.2527/jas.2007-0733 Hill, 1981, Estimation of effective population size from data on linkage disequilibrium, Genet. Res., 38, 209, 10.1017/S0016672300020553 Legarra, 2008, Technical note: Computing strategies in genome-wide selection, J. Dairy Sci., 91, 360, 10.3168/jds.2007-0403 Lillehammer, 2008, Quantitative trait locus-by-environment interaction for milk yield traits on Bos taurus autosome 6, Genetics, 179, 1539, 10.1534/genetics.107.084483 Meuwissen, 2004, Mapping multiple QTL using linkage disequilibrium and linkage analysis information and multitrait data, Genet. Sel. Evol., 36, 261, 10.1186/1297-9686-36-3-261 Meuwissen, 2001, Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps, Genetics, 157, 1819, 10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819 Muir, 2007, Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters, J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 124, 342, 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2007.00700.x Piyasatian, 2006, Genomic selection for composite line development using low density marker maps Pritchard, 2000, Association mapping in structured populations, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 67, 170, 10.1086/302959 Sanna, 2008, Common variants in the GDF5-UQCC region are associated with variation in human height, Nat. Genet., 40, 198, 10.1038/ng.74 Schaeffer, 2006, Strategy for applying genome-wide selection in dairy cattle, J. Anim. Breed. Genet., 123, 218, 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2006.00595.x Scheet, 2006, A fast and flexible statistical model for large-scale population genotype data: Applications to inferring missing genotypes and haplotypic phase, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 78, 629, 10.1086/502802 Shrimpton, 1988, The isolation of polygenic factors controlling bristle score in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Distribution of third chromosome bristle effects within chromosome sections, Genetics, 118, 445, 10.1093/genetics/118.3.445 Smith, 1967, Improvement of metric traits through specific genetic loci, Anim. Prod., 9, 349, 10.1017/S0003356100038642 Soller, 1983, Genetic polymorphism in variety identification and genetic improvement, Theor. Appl. Genet., 67, 25, 10.1007/BF00303917 Spelman, 2002, Characterization of the DGAT1 gene in the New Zealand dairy population, J. Dairy Sci., 85, 3514, 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74440-8 Tsuruta, 2008, Technical note: Computing options for genetic evaluation with a large number of genetic markers, J. Anim. Sci., 86, 1514, 10.2527/jas.2007-0324 VanRaden, 2009, Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls, J. Dairy Sci., 92, 16, 10.3168/jds.2008-1514 Wray, 1994, Increasing long term response to selection, Genet. Sel. Evol., 26, 431, 10.1186/1297-9686-26-5-431 Xu, 2003, Estimating polygenic effects using markers of the entire genome, Genetics, 163, 789, 10.1093/genetics/163.2.789 Xu, 2007, Genome-wide analysis of epistatic effects for quantitative traits in barley, Genetics, 175, 1955, 10.1534/genetics.106.066571