Habits of the heart revisited: Autonomy, community, and divinity in adults' moral language

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 18 - Trang 71-86 - 1995
Lene Arnett Jensen1
1University of Chicago, Committee on Human Development, Chicago

Tóm tắt

The intent of this article is to raise anew the question of the extent to which individualism prevails in the moral vocabulary of Americans. The present study affirms the observation of Bellah and his colleagues that a language of individualism is common among middle-class Americans. However, it departs from their conclusion that this language has become preponderant. Analyses of thirty in-depth interviews about a variety of moral issues revealed that the moral language of young middle-class adults indeed centered on the rights, interests, and feelings of the individual. However, this was not the language of midlife and older adults. They spoke of community and divinity considerations as much as individualistic considerations.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bellah, R. N., R. Madsen, W. M. Sullivan, A. Swidler, & S. M. Tipton. (1985).Habits of the Heart. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers. Berger, P. L. (1967).The Sacred Canopy. New York: Anchor Books, Doubleday. Durkheim, E. (1893/1984).The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press. Durkheim, E. (1897/1951).Suicide: A Study in Sociology. New York: The Free Press. (1898/1975). Individualism and the intellectuals. In W. S. F. Pickering (Ed.),Durkheim on Religion. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. Erikson, E. (1963).Childhood and Society. New York: Morton. Haidt, J., S. H. Koller, & M. G. Dias. (1993). Affect, culture, and morality, or, Is it wrong to eat your dog?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 613–628. Hewitt, J. P. (1990).Dilemmas of the American Self. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Jensen, L. A. (1993). The ethics of autonomy, community, and divinity: A theory and an exploratory study. Unpublished manuscript. University of Chicago. Kohlberg, L. (1973). Stages and aging in moral development — Some speculations.Gerontologist, 13, 497–502. Kohlberg, L., & C. Power. (1981). Moral development, religious thinking, and the question of a seventh stage.Zygon, 16, 203–259. Lasch, C. (1978).The Culture of Narcissism. New York: Norton. (1984).The Minimal Self. New York: W. W. Norton & Company. Luckmann, T. (1963).The Invisible Religion. New York: The Macmillan Company. Parsons, T. (1963). Christianity and modern industrial society. In E. A. Tiryakin (Ed.),Sociological Theory, Values, and Sociocultural Change. London: Collier-Macmillan, Ltd. Rieff, P. (1966).The Triumph of the Therapeutic. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Roof, W. C., & W. McKinney. (1987).American Mainline Religion. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press. Sandel, M. (1982).Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. New York: Cambridge University Press. Sennett, R. (1974).The Fall of Public Man. New York: Vintage Books. Shweder, R. A. (1990). In defense of moral realism: Reply to Gabennesch.Child Development, 61, 2060–2067. Shweder, R. A., N. Much, M. Mahapatra, & L. Park. (In press). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, divinity), and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In A. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.),Morality and Health. Tocqueville, A. de (1840/1966).Democracy in America. New York: Anchor Books. Wuthnow, R. (1991).Acts of Compassion. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.