Open Innovation Business Model as an Opportunity to Enhance the Development of Sustainable Shared Mobility Industry

Elsevier BV - Tập 8 - Trang 37 - 2022
Katarzyna Turoń1
1Department of Road Transport, Faculty of Transport and Aviation Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 40-019 Katowice, Poland

Tài liệu tham khảo

Shared Mobility Market by Service (Ride Hailing, Bike Sharing, Ride Sharing and Car Sharing), Vehicle (Passenger Cars, LCVs, Busses & Coaches and Micro mobility), Business Model (P2P, B2B and B2C) and Power Source (Fuel Powered, Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV), Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle (PHEV) and Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV)): Global Opportunity Analysis and Industry Forecast, 2021–2027 Available online: https://www.alliedmarketresearch.com/shared-mobility-market-A10179 (accessed on 27 January 2022) Novikova, 2017, The Sharing Economy and the Future of Personal Mobility: New Models Based on Car Sharing, Technol. Innov. Manag. Rev., 7, 27, 10.22215/timreview/1097 Hjorteset, 2021, Intraurban geographies of car sharing supply and demand in Greater Oslo, Norway, Transp. Res. Part D Transp. Environ., 101, 103089, 10.1016/j.trd.2021.103089 Boyacı, 2019, Investigating the effect of temporal and spatial flexibility on the performance of one-way electric carsharing systems, Transp. Res. Part B Methodol., 129, 244, 10.1016/j.trb.2019.09.003 Natalia Kireeva, 2021, Car Sharing Market Development in Russia, Transp. Res. Procedia, 54, 123, 10.1016/j.trpro.2021.02.055 Cruz, 2021, Experiences of Innovation in Public Services for Sustainable Urban Mobility, J. Urban Manag. Reck, 2021, Explaining shared micromobility usage, competition and mode choice by modelling empirical data from Zurich, Switzerland, Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol., 124, 102947, 10.1016/j.trc.2020.102947 Saeed, 2021, Preparing road infrastructure to accommodate connected and automated vehicles: System-level perspective, J. Infrastruct. Syst., 27, 06020003, 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000593 Terrien, 2016, Good practices for advancing urban mobility innovation: A case study of one-way carsharing, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 20, 20, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.08.001 Esztergár-Kiss, 2020, Creation of mobility packages based on the MaaS concept, Travel Behav. Soc., 21, 307, 10.1016/j.tbs.2019.05.007 Turoń, 2021, Business Innovations in the New Mobility Market during the COVID-19 with the Possibility of Open Business Model Innovation, J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 7 Jamal, 2022, Transport preferences and dilemmas in the post-lockdown (COVID-19) period. Findings from a qualitative study of young commuters in Chaka, Banghadesh, Case Stud. Transp. Policy, 10.1016/j.cstp.2022.01.001 Xie, 2020, The Impact of Risk Perception on Social Distancing during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 10.3390/ijerph17176256 Yuan, 2021, An Assessment of Social Distancing Obedience Behavior during the COVID-19 Post-Epidemic Period in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey, Sustainability, 13, 10.3390/su13148091 Fabiani, 2021, Sustainable production and consumption in remote working conditions due to COVID-19 lockdown in Italy: An environmental and user acceptance investigation, Sustain. Prod. Consum., 28, 1757, 10.1016/j.spc.2021.09.013 Shokouhyar, 2021, Shared mobility in post-COVID era: New challenges and opportunities, Sustain. Cities Soc., 67, 102714, 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102714 Awad-Núñez1, 2021, Post-COVID-19 travel behaviour patterns: Impact on the willingness to pay of users of public transport and shared mobility services in Spain, Eur. Transp. Res. Rev., 13, 20, 10.1186/s12544-021-00476-4 Rahimi, 2021, Perceived risk of using shared mobility services during the COVID-19 pandemic, Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav., 81, 271, 10.1016/j.trf.2021.06.012 Corazza, 2021, Chronicles from the new normal: Urban planning, mobility and land-use management in the face of the COVID-19 crisis, Transp. Res. Interdiscip. Perspect., 12, 100503 Khorram-Manesh, 2021, Implementing Public Health Strategies—The Need for Educational Initiatives: A Systematic Review, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18, 10.3390/ijerph18115888 Chivite Cebolla, 2021, Collaborative economy, a society service? Involvement with ethics and the common good, Bus. Ethics Environ. Responsib., 30, 657, 10.1111/beer.12339 Owyang, 2013, The Collaborative Economy, Altimeter Res., 1 Sutherland, 2018, The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 43, 328, 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.07.004 Jorge-Vázquez, 2019, La economía colaborativa en la era digital: Fundamentación teórica y alcance económico Becker, 2020, Assessing the welfare impacts of Shared Mobility and Mobility as a Service (MaaS), Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract., 131, 228, 10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.027 Hasselwander, 2021, Understanding platform internationalisation to predict the diffusion of new mobility services, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 100765 Cohen, 2016, The City as a Lab: Open Innovation Meets the Collaborative Economy, Calif. Manag. Rev., 59, 5, 10.1177/0008125616683951 E. Hansen M. Gomm R. Reichwald Providing Sustainable Mobility for All Through Open Innovation: The Case of gopping.de Proceedings of the 39th World Congress of the International Institute of Sociology Yerevan, Armenia 11–14 June 2009 Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1440746 (accessed on 15 September 2021) Münzel, 2018, Carsharing business models in Germany: Characteristics, success and future prospects, Inf. Syst. E-Bus. Manag., 16, 271, 10.1007/s10257-017-0355-x Cohen, 2014, Ride On! Mobility Business Models for the Sharing Economy, Organ. Environ., 27, 279, 10.1177/1086026614546199 Frenken, 2017, Political economies and environmental futures for the sharing economy, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., 375, 20160367, 10.1098/rsta.2016.0367 Shaheen, 2013, Carsharing and personal vehicle services: Worldwide market developments and emerging trends, Int. J. Sustain. Transp., 7, 5, 10.1080/15568318.2012.660103 Coenegrachts, 2021, Business Model Blueprints for the Shared Mobility Hub Network, Sustainability, 13, 10.3390/su13126939 Turoń, 2021, Open Innovation in the Shared Mobility Market, J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 7 Teece, 2010, Business Models. Business Strategy and Innovation, Long Range Plan., 43, 172, 10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.003 Chesbrough, 2006 Sarasini, 2021, Business model innovation as a process for transforming user mobility practices, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 39, 229, 10.1016/j.eist.2021.04.005 Wiprächtiger, 2019, Access-based business model innovation in frontier markets: Case study of shared mobility in Timor-Leste, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 143, 224, 10.1016/j.techfore.2019.02.004 Weiblen, 2016, The Open Business Model: Understanding an Emerging Concept, J. Multi. Bus. Model Innov. Technol., 2, 35, 10.13052/jmbmit2245-456X.212 Peñarroya-Farell, 2021, Business Model Dynamics from Interaction with Open Innovation, J. Open Innov. Technol. Mark. Complex., 7 Enkel, 2009, Open R&D and open innovation: Exploring the phenomenon, R&D Manag., 39, 311, 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00570.x Khumalo, 2017, The Open Business Model In A Dynamic Business Environment: A Literature Review, S. Afr. J. Ind. Eng., 28, 147 West, 2014, Leveraging External Sources of Innovation: A Review of Research on Open Innovation, J. Prod. Innov. Manag., 31, 814, 10.1111/jpim.12125 Visnjic, 2019, The path to outcome delivery: Interplay of service market strategy and open business models, Technovation, 72, 46 Moradi, 2021, Impact of organizational inertia on business model innovation, open innovation and corporate performance, Asia Pac. Manag. Rev., 26, 171 Najar, 2020, Antecedents to open business model in the ICT-based sectors, J. High Technol. Manag. Res., 31, 100388, 10.1016/j.hitech.2020.100388 Tsutsui, 2020, A Strategic Design Guideline for Open Business Models, Int. J. Autom. Technol., 14, 678, 10.20965/ijat.2020.p0678 Safdari Ranjbar, 2014, Open innovation, a comprehensive overview of concepts, approaches, trends and key success factors, Technol. Growth, 10, 10 Purdy, 2012, Three new business models for “the open firm”, Strategy Leadersh., 40, 36, 10.1108/10878571211278877 Gurca, 2021, Managing the challenges of business-to-business open innovation in complex projects: A multi-stage process model, Ind. Mark. Manag., 94, 202, 10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.035 Ottonicar, 2020, Opening Science and Innovation: Opportunities for Emerging Economies. Foresight and STI Governance Baldwin, 2011, Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation, Organ. Sci., 22, 1399, 10.1287/orsc.1100.0618 Berkhout, 2006, Innovating the innovation process, Int. J. Technol. Manag., 34, 390, 10.1504/IJTM.2006.009466 Rohrbeck, 2009, Opening up for competitive advantage: How Deutsche Telekom creates an open innovation ecosystem, R&D Manag., 39, 420, 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2009.00568.x Granstrand, 1990, Managing innovation in multitechnology corporations, Res. Policy, 19, 35, 10.1016/0048-7333(90)90033-3 Wincent, 2009, Network board continuity and effectiveness of open innovation in Swedish strategic small-firm networks, R&D Manag., 39, 55, 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00539.x Spaeth, 2010, Enabling knowledge creation through outsiders: Towards a push model of open innovation, Int. J. Technol. Manag., 52, 411, 10.1504/IJTM.2010.035983 Dodgson, 2006, The role of technology in the shift towards open innovation: The case of Procter & Gamble, R&D Manag., 36, 3, 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2006.00429.x Nonaka, 1995 Rizova, 2006, Are you networked for successful innovation?, MIT Sloan Manag. Rev., 47, 49 Belussi, 2010, Learning at the boundaries in an “Open Regional Innovation System”: A focus on firms’ innovation strategies in the Emilia Romagna life science industry, Res. Policy, 39, 710, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.014 Abulrub, 2012, Open innovation management: Challenges and prospects, Procedia—Soc. Behav. Sci., 41, 130, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.04.017 McGahan, 2021, Tackling Societal Challenges with Open Innovation, Calif. Manag. Rev., 63, 49, 10.1177/0008125620973713 Bogers, 2019, Strategic Management of Open Innovation: A Dynamic Capabilities Perspective, Calif. Manag. Rev., 62, 77, 10.1177/0008125619885150 Schoemaker, 2018, Innovation, Dynamic Capabilities, and Leadership, Calif. Manag. Rev., 61, 15, 10.1177/0008125618790246 Christensen, 2005, The industrial dynamics of Open Innovation—Evidence from the transformation of consumer electronics, Res. Policy, 34, 1533, 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.002 Wantabe, 2009, Optimal Dynamics of Functionality Development in Open Innovation, IFAC Proc. Vol., 42, 173, 10.3182/20090506-3-SF-4003.00032 Schmeiss, 2019, Designing Governance Mechanisms in Platform Ecosystems: Addressing the Paradox of Openness through Blockchain Technology, Calif. Manag. Rev., 62, 121, 10.1177/0008125619883618 Bogers, 2010, Users as Innovators A Review, Critique, and Future Research Directions, J. Manag., 36, 857 Muñoz, 2018, A Compass for Navigating Sharing Economy Business Models, Calif. Manag. Rev., 61, 114, 10.1177/0008125618795490 Iivari, 2022, Opening Closed Business Ecosystem Boundaries With Digital Platforms, 67 Adner, 2010, Value Creation in Innovation Ecosystems: How the Structure of Technological Interdependence Affects Firm Performance in New Technology Generations, Strateg. Manag. J., 31, 306, 10.1002/smj.821 Chesbrough, 2014, Chez Panisse: Building an Open Innovation Ecosystem, Calif. Manag. Rev., 56, 144, 10.1525/cmr.2014.56.4.144 Berglund, 2013, Business model innovation from an open systems perspective: Structural challenges and managerial solutions, Int. J. Prod. Dev., 18, 274, 10.1504/IJPD.2013.055011 Blankenburg Holm, 1999, Creating Value through Mutual Commitment to Business Network Relationships, Strateg. Manag. J., 20, 467, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199905)20:5<467::AID-SMJ38>3.0.CO;2-J Chetty, 2002, Mutual commitment and experiential knowledge in mature international business relationship, Int. Bus. Rev., 11, 305, 10.1016/S0969-5931(01)00062-2 A. Chopra M. Singh Specifying and applying commitment-based business patterns Proceedings of the AAMAS‘11: The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems Taipei, Taiwan 2–6 May 2011 Volume 2 475 482 Available online: https://ifaamas.org/Proceedings/aamas2011/papers/A4_R55.pdf (accessed on 6 January 2022) Duenas, 2021, Trust in international cooperation: Emotional and cognitive trust complement each other over time, Crit. Perspect. Account., 102328, 10.1016/j.cpa.2021.102328 Luczak, 2017, University–Real Estate Industry Cooperation in Open Innovation in the Topic of Walkability (breakout presentation), J. Transp. Health, 7, S54, 10.1016/j.jth.2017.11.089 Okano-Heijmans, 2021, Promoting open and inclusive connectivity: The case for digital development cooperation, Res. Glob., 3, 100061 Xie, 2020, How can open innovation ecosystem modes push product innovation forward? An fsQCA analysis, J. Bus. Res., 108, 29, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.10.011 Chesbrough, 2003 West, 2008, Getting Clear About Communities in Open Innovation, Ind. Innov., 15, 223, 10.1080/13662710802033734 Chesbrough, 2014, Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation, 3 Kirschbaum, 2005, Open Innovation In Practice, Res.-Technol. Manag., 48, 24 Jabłoński, 2013 Whyte, 2001 Gehl, 2013 Google Play Database Available online: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.luckydroid.droidbase&hl=pl&gl=US (accessed on 10 October 2021) Osterwalder, 2010, Strategyzer Series Matyja, 2022, Possibility to Use Professional Bicycle Computers for the Scientific Evaluation of Electric Bikes: Trajectory, Distance, and Slope Data, Energies, 15 Long, 2021, When bike sharing business models go bad: Incorporating responsibility into business model innovation, J. Clean. Prod., 297, 126679, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126679 Carrese, 2021, A Beautiful Fleet: Optimal Repositioning in E-scooter Sharing Systems for Urban Decorum, Transp. Res. Procedia, 52, 581, 10.1016/j.trpro.2021.01.069 Berlin Official Website Available online: https://www.berlin.de/en/getting-around/carsharing/ (accessed on 24 December 2021) Wittwer, 2018, Free-Floating Carsharing Experiences in German Metropolitan Areas, Transp. Res. Procedia, 33, 323, 10.1016/j.trpro.2018.10.109 Bouhouras, 2022, COVID-19′s Pandemic Effects on Bike Sharing Systems: A New Reality for Urban Mobility?, Appl. Sci., 12, 10.3390/app12031230 Mindur, 2018, Car-Sharing Development—Current State and Perspective, Logist. Transp., 39, 5, 10.26411/83-1734-2015-3-39-1-18 Neumann, 2021, The Impact of Carsharing on Transport in the City. Case Study of Tri-City in Poland, Sustainability, 13, 10.3390/su13020688 Mergel, 2015, Opening Government: Designing Open Innovation Processes to Collaborate With External Problem Solvers, Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev., 33, 599, 10.1177/0894439314560851 Sara Fernández-López, 2014, Are firms interested in collaborating with universities? An open-innovation perspective in countries of the South West European Space, Serv. Bus., 9, 637, 10.1007/s11628-014-0243-0 J.R. Skrob Open Source and Viral Marketing the Viral Marketing Concept as a Model for Open Source Software to Reach the Critical Mass for Global Brand Awareness Based on the Example of TYPO3 Available online: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.494.8779&rep=rep1&type=pdf (accessed on 27 January 2022) Roldán Bravo, 2017, Open innovation and quality management: The moderating role of nterorganizational IT infrastructure and complementary learning styles, Prod. Plan. Control, 28, 1, 10.1080/09537287.2017.1306895 Le Pira, 2021, Opportunities for integration between Mobility as a Service (MaaS) and freight transport: A conceptual model, Sustain. Cities Soc., 74, 103212, 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103212 Turoń, 2021, Social barriers and transportation social exclusion issues in creating sustainable car-sharing systems, Entrep. Sustain. Issues, 9, 10 Vaisnore, 2011, Customer Involvement into Open Innovation Processes: A Conceptual Model, Soc. Sci., 73, 62 Greco, 2019, Benefits and costs of open innovation: The BeCO framework, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag., 1, 53, 10.1080/09537325.2018.1484442 Nguyen, 2021, A Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Open Innovation on Performance, J. Manag. Organ., 1 R. Bellan Micromobility in 2022: Refined, Mature and Packed Full of Tech. Techcrunch Portal Available online: https://techcrunch.com/2021/12/27/micromobility-in-2022-refined-mature-and-packed-full-of-tech/?fbclid=IwAR1-HZhgXalGkkd35GXhblhmOLHcqCle4xyxBvbv0polr14RWN8SSGZzAuA (accessed on 28 December 2021)