Diversity and constructive conflict in stakeholder dialogue: considerations for design and methods

Policy Sciences - Tập 45 - Trang 23-46 - 2011
Eefje Cuppen1
1Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands

Tóm tắt

Diversity is generally recognized as a key issue for learning in stakeholder dialogue on wicked sustainability issues. Yet the question on how design of stakeholder dialogue and supporting methods actually enhance learning in stakeholder dialogue deserves more attention. This paper presents constructive conflict as a central design issue for stakeholder dialogue. This means that a dialogue entails the articulation of a diversity of perspectives and the confrontation of claims and ideas based on these perspectives. Building on three properties of diversity (variety, balance and disparity), the methodological implications of constructive conflict as a central design issue will be derived. These implications are structured according to three design steps: stakeholder identification and selection, articulation of perspectives and confrontation of claims and ideas. It is argued that social scientific methods are needed to support design of stakeholder dialogue. Q methodology is presented as an example that was used in a stakeholder dialogue on sustainable biomass in the Netherlands to identify stakeholder perspectives, to select stakeholders and to structure the dialogue. The paper wraps up with conclusions on constructive conflict as a design issue.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ackhoff, R. (1974). Redesigning the future. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Agterbosch, S. (2006). Empowering wind power. On social and institutional conditions affecting the performance of entrepreneurs in the wind power supply market in the Netherlands. Utrecht: Utrecht University. Amason, A. C., Hochwarter, W. A., Thompson, K. R., & Harrison, A. W. (1995). Conflict: An important dimension in successful management teams. Organizational Dynamics, 24, 20–35. Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York: General Learning Press. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Barry, J., & Proops, J. (1999). Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology. Ecological Economics, 28, 337–345. Blackstock, K. L., Kelly, G. J., & Horsey, B. L. (2007). Developing and applying a framework to evaluate participatory research for sustainability. Ecological Economics, 60, 726–742. Breukers, S. (2006). Changing institutional landscapes for implementing wind power. A geographical comparison of institutional capacity-building: The Netherlands. England and North Rhine Westphalia, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. Breukers, S., & Wolsink, M. (2007). Wind power in changing institutional landscapes: An international comparison. Energy Policy, 35, 2737–2750. Brodbeck, F. C., Kerschreiter, R., Mojzisch, A., Frey, D., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2002). The dissemination of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: the effects of pre-discussion dissent. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 35–56. Brown, S. R. (1980). Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science. New Haven and London: Yale University Press. Burgess, J., Stirling, A., Clark, J., Davies, G., Eames, M., Staley, K., et al. (2007). Deliberative mapping: A novel analytic-deliberative methodology to support contested science-policy decisions. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 299–322. Clarke, A. H. (2002). Understanding sustainable development in the context of other emergent environmental perspectives. Policy Sciences, 35, 69–90. Cockerill, K., Daniel, L., Malcynski, L., & Tidwell, V. (2009). A fresh look at a policy sciences methodology: Collaborative modeling for more effective policy. Policy Sciences, 42, 225. Coglianese, C. (1999). The limits of consensus. The environmental protection system in transition: Toward a more desirable future. Environment, 41, 1–6. Collins, H. M., & Evans, R. (2002). The third wave of science studies: Studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32, 235–296. Crawford, M., Rutter, D., & Thelwall, S. (2003). User involvement in change management London: NCCSDO. Crookall, D. (1995). A guide to the literature on simulation/gaming. In D. Crookall & K. Arai (Eds.), Simulation and gaming across disciplines and cultures: ISAGA at a watershed (pp. 151–177). London: Sage Publications. Crosby, N. (2003). Health democracy: empowering a clear and informed voice of the public. Edina MN: Beaver’s Pond Press. Cuppen, E. (2009). Putting perspectives into participation: Constructive conflict methodology for problem structuring in stakeholder dialogues. Oisterwijk: Boxpress. Cuppen, E. (forthcoming). A quasi-experimental evaluation of learning in a stakeholder dialogue on bio-energy. Submitted to Research Policy. Cuppen, E., Breukers, S., Hisschemöller, M., & Bergsma, E. (2010). Q Methodology to select participants for a stakeholder dialogue on energy options from biomass in the Netherlands. Ecological Economics, 69, 579–591. Davies, B. B., & Hodge, I. D. (2007). Exploring environmental perspectives in lowland agriculture: A Q methodology study in East Anglia, UK. Ecological Economics, 61, 323–333. De Dreu, C. (1997). Productive conflict: The importance of conflict management and conflict issue. In C. De Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations (pp. 9–22). London: Sage. De Dreu, C., & Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Using conflict in organizations. London: Sage. De Marchi, B., Funtowicz, S. O., Lo Cascio, S., & Munda, G. (2000). Combining participative and institutional approaches with multicriteria evaluation. An empirical study for water issues in Troina, Sicily. Ecological Economics, 34, 267–282. Dienel, P. C. (1978). Die Planungszelle. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). Risk and culture. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. Dryzek, J. S., & Berejikian, A. (1993). Reconstructive democratic theory. American Political Science Review, 87, 48–60. Dryzek, J. S., & Niemeyer, S. (2008). Discursive representation. American Political Science Review, 102, 481–492. Dunn, W. N. (1988). Methods of the second type: Coping with the wilderness of conventional policy analysis. Policy Studies Review, 7, 720–737. Dunn, W. N. (1997). Probing the boundaries of ignorance in policy analysis. American Behavioral Scientist, 40, 277–298. Dunn, W. N. (2001). Using the method of context validation to mitigate type III error in environmental policy analysis. In M. Hisschemöller, R. Hoppe, W. N. Dunn, & J. R. Ravetz (Eds.), Knowledge, power and participation in environmental policy analysis (pp. 417–436). New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers. Dunn, W. N. (2004). Public policy analysis (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. Einsiedel, E. F., & Eastlick, D. L. (2000). Consensus conferences as deliberative democracy: A communications perspective. Science Communication, 21, 323–343. Einsiedel, E. F., Jelsoe, E., & Breck, T. (2001). Publics at the technology table: The consensus conference in Denmark, Canada, and Australia. Public Understanding of Science, 10, 83–98. Ellis, G., Barry, J., & Robinson, C. (2007). Many ways to say ‘No’, different ways to say ‘Yes’: Applying q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50, 517–551. Fiorino, D. J. (1990). Citizen participation and environmental risk: A survey of institutional mechanisms. Science Technology & Human Values, 15, 226–243. Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. London: UCL Press Limited. Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25, 739–755. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. Gough, C., Darier, E., De Marchi, B., Funtowicz, F., Grove-White, R., Guimarães Pereira, A., et al. (2003). Contexts of citizen participation. In B. Kasemir, J. Jäger, C. C. Jaeger, & M. T. Gardner (Eds.), Public participation in sustainability science (pp. 37–61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380. Gregory, R., Fischhoff, B., Thorne, S., & Butte, G. (2003). A multi-channel stakeholder consultation process for transmission deregulation. Energy Policy, 31, 1291–1299. Greitemeyer, T., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2003). Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 322–339. Grin, J., & Van de Graaf, H. (1996). Technology assessment as learning. Science, Technology & Human Values, 21, 72–99. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, California: Sage Publications. Guston, D. H. (1999). Evaluating the first US consensus conference: The impact of the citizens’ panel on telecommunications and the future of democracy. Science Technology & Human Values, 24, 451–482. Hekkert, M. P., Suurs, R. A. A., Negro, S. O., Kuhlman, S., & Smits, R. E. H. M. (2007). Functions of innovation systems: A new approach for analysing technological change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74. Hisschemöller, M. (1993). De democratie van problemen. Amsterdam: VU Uitgeverij. Hisschemöller, M. (2005). Participation as knowledge production and the limits of democracy. In S. Maasen & P. Weingart (Eds.), Democratization of expertise? Exploring new forms of scientific advice in political decision-making (pp. 189–207). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Hisschemöller, M., & Hoppe, R. (2001). Coping with intractable controversies: The case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis. In M. Hisschemöller, R. Hoppe, W. N. Dunn, & J. R. Ravetz (Eds.), Knowledge, power and participation in environmental policy analysis (pp. 47–72). New Brunswick and London: Transaction Publishers. Hisschemöller, M., Hoppe, R., Dunn, W. N., & Ravetz, J. R. (2001). Knowledge, power and participation in environmental policy analysis: An introduction. In M. Hisschemöller, R. Hoppe, W. N. Dunn, & J. R. Ravetz (Eds.), Knowledge, power and participation in environmental policy analysis (pp. 1–26). New Brunswick (U.S.A) and London: Transaction Publishers. Hoffman, L. R. (1959). Homogeneity of member personality and its effect on group problem-solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 27–32. Hoffman, L. R., & Maier, N. R. (1961). Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 401–407. Hoogerwerf, A. (1990). Reconstructing policy theory. Evaluation and Program Planning, 13, 285–291. Huitema, D., Van de Kerkhof, M., & Pesch, U. (2007). The nature of the beast: Are citizen’s juries deliberative or pluralist? Policy Sciences, 40, 287–311. Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink: Psychological studies of foreign policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin. Jasanoff, S. (2003). Breaking the waves in science studies: Comment on H.M Collins and Robert Evans, ‘The third wave of science studies’. Social Studies of Science, 33, 389–400. Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282. Jehn, K. A. (1997). Affective and cognitive conflict in work groups: Increasing performance through value-based intragroup conflict. In C. De Dreu & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Using conflict in organizations (pp. 87–100). London: Sage Publications. Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Review, 44, 238–251. Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741–763. Joldersma, C. (1997). Participatory policy making: Balancing between divergence and convergence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 6, 207–218. Joss, S. (2000). Die Konsensuskonferenz in Theorie und Anwendung. Stuttgart. Joss, S., & Durant, J. (1995). The UK national consensus conference on plant biotechnology. Public Understanding of Science, 4, 195–204. Kamp, L. M. (2007). The importance of learning processes in wind power development. European Environment, 17, 334–346. Kruglanski, A. W., & Webster, D. M. (1991). Group member’s reactions to opinion deviates and conformists at varying degrees of proximity to decision deadline and environmental noise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 212–225. Lahdelma, R., Salminen, P., & Hokkanen, J. (2000). Using multicriteria methods in environmental planning and management. Environmental Management, 26, 595–605. Levine, J. M., & Resnick, L. B. (1993). Social foundations of cognitions. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585–612. Martin, G. P. (2008). ‘Ordinary people only’: knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare. Sociology of Health & Illness, 30, 35–54. Mason, R. O. (1969). A dialectical approach to strategic planning. Management Science, 15, B403–B414. Mason, R. O., & Mitroff, I. I. (1981). Challenging strategic planning assumptions: Theory, cases and techniques. New York: Wiley. Mayer, I. S., Van Bueren, E. M., Bots, P. W. G., & Van der Voort, H. (2005). Collaborative decisionmaking for sustainable urban renewal projects: A simulation-gaming approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32, 403–423. McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. (1988). Q methodology. Newbury Park, Beverly Hills, London, New Delhi: Sage Publications. Mitroff, I. I. (1974). The subjective side of science: A philosophical inquiry into the psychology of the Apollo moon scientists. New York: Elsevier. Mitroff, I. I., & Emshoff, J. R. (1979). On strategic assumption-making; A dialectical approach to policy and planning. The Academy of Management Review, 4, 1–12. Mitroff, I. I., Emshoff, J. R., & Kilmann, R. H. (1979). Assumptional analysis: A methodology for strategic problem solving. Management Science, 25, 583–593. Mitroff, I. I., Mason, R. O., & Barabba, V. P. (1983). The 1980 census: policymaking amid turbulence. Lexington. Mitroff, I. I., & Sagasti, F. (1973). Epistemology as general systems theory: An approach to the design of complex decision-making experiments. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 3, 117–134. Müller-Merbach, H. (2004). Creative conflict. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 2, 129–130. Nemeth, C., Brown, K., & Rogers, J. (2001). Devil’s advocate versus authentic dissent: stimulating quantity and quality. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 707–720. Nemeth, C., Personnaz, B., Personnaz, M., & Goncalo, J. A. (2004). The liberating role of conflict in group creativity: A study in two countries. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 365–374. Nooteboom, B., Van Haverbeke, W., Duysters, G., Gilsing, V., & Van den Oord, A. (2007). Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 36, 1016–1034. Oughton, D. H., & Strand, P. (2004). The Oslo consensus conference on protection of the environment. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 74, 7–17. Quist, J., & Vergragt, P. (2006). Past and future of backcasting: The shift to stakeholder participation and a proposal for a methodological framework. Futures, 38, 1027–1045. Raiffa, H. (1970). Decision analysis: Introductory lectures on choices under uncertainty. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Rein, M. (1986). Frame-reflective policy discourse. Inaugural address, 17th Oct, 1986 (extended version). Renn, O. (1999). A model for an analytic-deliberative process in risk management. Environmental Science and Technology, 33, 3049–3055. Renn, O. (2004). The challenge of integrating deliberation and expertise: Participation and discourse in risk management. In T. L. MacDaniels & M. J. Small (Eds.), Risk analysis and society: An interdisciplinary characterization of the field (pp. 289–366). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Renn, O., Webler, T., & Johnson, B. B. (1991). Public participation in hazard management: The use of citizen panels in the US. Issues in Health & Safety, 19, 197–226. Renn, O., Webler, T., Rakel, H., Dienel, P., & Johnson, B. (1993). Public participation in decision making: A three-step procedure. Policy Sciences, 26, 189–214. Rip, A. (2003). Constructing expertise: In a third wave of science studies. Social Studies of Science, 33, 419–434. Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169. Robbins, P., & Krueger, R. (2000). Beyond bias? The promise and limits of Q method in human geography. Professional Geographer, 52, 636–648. Robinson, J. (1982). Energy backcasting: A proposed method of policy analysis. Energy Policy, 10, 337–344. Robinson, J. (2003). Future subjunctive: backcasting as social learning. Futures, 35, 839–856. Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science Technology & Human Values, 30, 251–290. Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Towards the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books. Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Ragan, J. W. (1986). Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: A comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy and consensus. The Academy of Management Journal, 29, 51–71. Simon, H. (1973). The structure of ill-structured problems. Artifical Intelligence, 4, 181–201. Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. D. (1992). Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426–434. Stasser, G., Taylor, L. A., & Hanna, C. (1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussion of three- and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467–1478. Stasser, G., & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467–1478. Stave, K. A. (2002). Using system dynamics to improve public participation in environmental decisions. System Dynamics Review, 18, 139–167. Stephenson, W. (1935). Correlating persons instead of tests. Character and Personality, 4, 17–24. Stirling, A. (1998). On the economics and analysis of diversity. SPRU Electronic working paper series, 28. Stirling, A., & Mayer, S. (2001). A novel approach to the appraisal of technological risk: A multicriteria mapping study of a genetically modified crop. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 19, 529–555. Street, P. (1997). Scenario workshops: A participatory approach to sustainable urban living? Futures, 29, 139–158. Swedeen, P. (2006). Post-normal science in practice: A Q study of the potential for sustainable forestry in Washington State, USA. Ecological Economics, 57, 190–208. The Social Learning Group. (2001). Learning to manage global environmental risks. Cambridge USA: MIT Press. Thompson, M., Ellis, R., & Wildavsky, A. (1990). Cultural theory. Boulder: Westview Press. Van Asselt, M., & Rijkens-Klomp, N. (2002). A look in the mirror: Reflection on participation in integrated assessment from a methodological perspective. Global Environmental Change, 12, 167–184. Van de Kerkhof, M. (2006a). A dialogue approach to enhance learning for sustainability: A Dutch experiment with two participatory methods in the field of climate change. The Integrated Assessment Journal, 6, 7–34. Van de Kerkhof, M. (2006b). Making a difference: On the constraints of consensus building and the relevance of deliberation in stakeholder dialogues. Policy Sciences, 39, 279–299. Van de Kerkhof, M. & Wieczorek, A. J. (2005). Learning and stakeholder participation in transition processes towards sustainability: Methodological considerations. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72, 733–747. Van Eeten, M. (2001). Recasting intractable policy issues: The wider implications of the Netherlands civil aviation controversy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20, 391–414. Voss, J. P., Smith, A., & Grin, J. (Eds.). (2009). Designing long-term policy. Policy Sciences, 42 (Special issue). Webler, T. (1995). “Right” discourse in citizen participation: An evaluative yardstick. In O. Renn, T. Webler, & P. Wiedemann (Eds.), Fairness and competence in citizen participation (pp. 35–86). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Webler, T., Kastenholz, H., & Renn, O. (1995). Public participation in impact assessment: A social learning perspective. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 15, 443–463. Webler, T., Tuler, S., & Krueger, R. (2001). What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public. Environmental Management, 27, 435–450. Wittenbaum, G. M. (2000). The bias toward discussing shared information: Why are high-status group members immune? Communication Research, 27, 379–400. Wittenbaum, G. M., Hubbel, A. P., & Zuckerman, C. (1999). Mutual enhancement: Toward an understanding of the collective preference for shared information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5, 967–978. Wolsink, M. (2004). Policy beliefs in spatial decisions: Contrasting core beliefs concerning space making for waste infrastructure. Urban Studies, 41, 2669–2690. Wynne, B. (2003). Seasick on the third wave? Subverting the hegemony of propositionalism: Response to Collins and Evans (2002). Social Studies of Science, 33, 401–417.