Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection

The Journal of Urology - Tập 196 Số 3 - Trang 690-696 - 2016
Francesca Mertan1, Matthew D. Greer1, Joanna H. Shih2, Arvin K. George3, Michael Kongnyuy3, Akhil Muthigi3, Maria J. Merino4, Bradford J. Wood5, Peter A. Pinto3, Peter L. Choyke1, Barış Türkbey1
1Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
2Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis: Biometric Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland
3Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
4Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
5Center for Interventional Oncology, National Cancer Institute and Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Tóm tắt

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Siegel, 2016, Cancer statistics, 2016, CA Cancer J Clin, 66, 7, 10.3322/caac.21332

Scattoni, 2007, Extended and saturation prostatic biopsy in the diagnosis and characterisation of prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature, Eur Urol, 52, 1309, 10.1016/j.eururo.2007.08.006

Nelson, 2013, Repeat prostate biopsy strategies after initial negative biopsy: meta-regression comparing cancer detection of transperineal, transrectal saturation and MRI guided biopsy, PLoS One, 8, e57480, 10.1371/journal.pone.0057480

Epstein, 2012, Upgrading and downgrading of prostate cancer from biopsy to radical prostatectomy: incidence and predictive factors using the modified Gleason grading system and factoring in tertiary grades, Eur Urol, 61, 1019, 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.01.050

Turkbey, 2015, Multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of prostate cancer, CA Cancer J Clin

Siddiqui, 2015, Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer, JAMA, 313, 390, 10.1001/jama.2014.17942

American College of Radiology: PI-RADS™: Prostate Imaging – Reporting and Data System 2015, version 2. Available at www.acr.org/∼/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Resources/PIRADS/PIRADS%20V2.pdf.

Barentsz, 2012, ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012, Eur Radiol, 22, 746, 10.1007/s00330-011-2377-y

Vargas, 2016, Updated Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference, Eur Radiol, 26, 1606, 10.1007/s00330-015-4015-6

Muller, 2015, Prostate cancer: interobserver agreement and accuracy with the revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System at multiparametric MR imaging, Radiology, 277, 741, 10.1148/radiol.2015142818

Barentsz, 2016, Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 guidelines for multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging and recommendations for use, Eur Urol, 69, 41, 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.08.038

Rosenkrantz, 2016, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), version 2: a critical look, AJR Am J Roentgenol, 206, 1179, 10.2214/AJR.15.15765

Radtke, 2016, Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion biopsy for index tumor detection: correlation with radical prostatectomy specimen, Eur Urol, 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.12.052

Xu, 2008, Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies, Comput Aided Surg, 13, 255, 10.3109/10929080802364645