A holistic view of maritime navigation accidents and risk indicators: examining IMO reports from 2011 to 2021
Tóm tắt
This paper investigated the risk indicators in maritime accidents and how they are considered within the reporting of maritime accidents, drawing on ten years of International Maritime Organisation (IMO) (2011–2020) accident reports. It highlighted the lack of consistent findings in studies exploring the role of vessel characteristics in maritime accidents, which often result from different methods, databases, techniques and motivations used by each respective study for gathering and analysing data. Furthermore, as human error continues to be highlighted as the top-cited cause of accidents, this study examined the qualitative content of IMO accident reports in-depth to broaden our understanding of maritime accident risk factors. Using a data-driven approach, statistical (ANOVA) and advanced text-mining techniques (using IRAMUTEQ software) were applied to extract meaning from the semi-structured and unstructured narrative descriptions that constitute most of the national administrations’ investigation reports to the IMO. Building on the text analysis of the IMO accident data, we proposed the Accident Maritime Ecosystem framework, which incorporates individuals, the ship organisation (on board), the internal ship ecosystem (on board and onshore), the external ship ecosystem (external factors) and the global maritime ecosystem (policies and regulations); moreover, it identifies these entities as risk factors in maritime accidents. The findings illustrate how accident reporting is largely human-centric and that as maritime transportation is becoming increasingly complex, there is a need for policy and organisational decision-makers to incorporate a broader scope of actors when considering maritime risk factors, which can be achieved by using the AME framework as a guideline.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Acejo I, Sampson H, Turgo N, Ellis N, Tang L (2018) The causes of maritime accidents in the period 2002–2016, Seafarers International Research Centre (SIRC), Cardiff University, United Kingdom. Available from http://orca.cf.ac.uk/117481/1/Sampson_The%20causes%20of%20maritime%20accidents%20in%20the%20period%202002-2016.pdf
Baniela SV, Rios J (2011) Maritime safety Sstandards and the seriousness of shipping accidents. J Navigat. 64:495–520. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463311000099
Baumler R, et François L (2005) Transport maritime, danger public et bien mondial. Issue 147 Editions CLM. Merchant marine - 412 pages
Berg N, Storgård J, Lappalainen J (2013) The impact of ship crews on maritime safety. Publ Cent Marit Stud Univ Turku A 64:1–48
Besnard D, Hollnagel E (2014) I want to believe: some myths about the management of industrial safety. Cognition Technology & Work 16(1):13–23
Bhardwaj U, Teixeira AP, Soares CG (2022) Casualty analysis methodology and taxonomy for FPSO accident analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 218:108169
Bienemann B, Ruschel NS, Campos ML, Negreiros MA, Mograbi DC (2020) Self-reported negative outcomes of psilocybin users: a quantitative textual analysis. PLoS One 15(2):e0229067. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229067
Brooks SK (2022) A Research Agenda for Workplace Stress and Well-being. Occup Med 72(9):651–652. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqac115
Brown DE (2016) Text mining the contributors to rail accidents. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 17:2
Bye RJ, Aalberg AL (2018) Maritime navigation accidents and risk indicators: an exploratory statistical analysis using AIS data and accident reports. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 176:174–186
Caridis P (1999) Casualty analysis methodology for maritime operations: CASMET project. Rep. No. C01.FR.003, National Technical Univ. of Athens, Athens, Greece. Available from https://trimis.ec.europa.eu/project/casualty-analysis-methodology-maritime-operations
Celik M, Cebi S (2008) Analytical HFACS for investigating human errors in shipping accidents. Accid Anal Prev 41(1):66–75
Changhai H, Shenping H (2019) Factors correlation mining on maritime accidents database using association rule learning algorithm. Cluster Comput 22(Suppl 2):4551–4559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-2089-z
Chaves, M.M.N., dos Santos, A.P.R., dos Santosa, N.P., Larocca, L.M. (2017). Use of the Software IRAMUTEQ in Qualitative Research: An Experience Report. In: Costa, A., Reis, L., Neri de Sousa, F., Moreira, A., Lamas, D. (eds) Computer Supported Qualitative Research. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 71. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43271-7_4
Choe S, Seo W, Kang Y (2020) Inter- and intra-organizational safety management practice differences in the construction industry. Saf Sci 128:104778
Dominguez-Péry C, Vuddaraju LNR, Corbett-Etchevers I, Tassabehji R (2021a) Reducing maritime accidents in ships by tackling human error: a bibliometric review and research agenda. J Shipp Trade 6(1):1–32
Dominguez-Péry C, Tassabehji R, Vuddaraju LR, Duffour V (2021b) Improving emergency response operations in maritime accidents using social media with big data analytics: the MV wakashio disaster case study. Int J Oper Prod Manag 41(9):1544–1567
EMSA (2020) Maritime accident fatalities in the EU. European Maritime Safety Agency. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/SEPDF/cache/93637.pdf
EMSA (2021) List of annual overview of marine casualties and incidents reports available for 2011–2021. Available from http://www.emsa.europa.eu/we-do/safety/accident-investigation.html
Fan S, Zhang J, Blanco-Davis E, Yang Z, Wang J, Yan X (2018) Effects of seafarers’ emotion on human performance using bridge simulation. Ocean Eng 170:111–119
Fan S, Blanco-Davis E, Yang Z, Zhang J, Yan X (2020) Incorporation of human factors into maritime accident analysis using a data-driven Bayesian network. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 203:107070
Fulconis F, Lissillour R (2021) Toward a behavioral approach of international shipping: a study of the inter-organisational dynamics of maritime safety. J Shipp Trade 6(1):1–23
Garrett JW, Teizer J (2009) Human factors analysis classification system relating to human error awareness taxonomy in construction safety. J Constr Eng Manag 135(8):754–763
Gavalas D, Syriopoulos T, Roumpis E (2022) Digital adoption and efficiency in the maritime industry. J Shipp Trade 7(1):1–22
George (2021) Wind ... or worse: was pilot error to blame for the Suez blockage? Guardian Online Rose George, 3/4/2021. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/apr/03/wind-or-worse-was-pilot-error-to-blame-for-the-suez-blockage
Grech MR, Horberry T, Smith A (2002) Human error in maritime operations: Analyses of accident reports using the Leximancer tool. In: Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society annual meeting. Sage Publications, Los Angeles, Vol. 46, pp. 1718–1721
Guardian (2021a) Ever given released from suez canal after compensation agreed Ruth Michaelson 7/7/2021a. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021a/jul/07/ever-given-released-from-suez-canal-after-compensation-agreed
Guardian (2021b) Suez canal: ever given container ship freed after a week 29/3/2021b Michael Safi in Beirut, Helena Smith in Athens and Martin Farrer https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021b/mar/29/suez-canal-attempt-re-float-ever-given-delay-salvage-tugboats
Haynes S, Estin PC, Lazarevski S, Soosay M, Kor A (2019) Data analytics: factors of traffic accidents. In: UK the 10th IEEE international conference on dependable systems, services and technologies, DESSERT’2019. Leeds, UK, pp. 120–126
Hollnagel E (2008) Investigation as an impediment to learning. In: Hollnagel E, Nemeth C, Dekker S (eds) Remaining sensitive to the possibility of failure (resilience engineering series). Ashgate, Aldershot
Hollnagel E (2014) Safety-I and safety-II: the past and future of safety management. CRC Press, London
Hollnagel E (2020) Synesis: the unification of productivity, quality, safety and reliability. Routledge, London
IMO (2014) Casualty related matters’ reports on marine casualites & incidents MSC-MEPC.3/Circ.4/Rev.1 Available from https://wwwcdn.imo.org/localresources/en/OurWork/IIIS/Documents/Casualty%20documents/4-Rev-1.pdf
IMO (2021a) Reporting to IMO of marine safety investigation and marine casulaties and incidents based on the following IMO instruments. Available from https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/MSAS/Pages/Reporting.aspx and https://www.imo.org/en/OurWork/MSAS/Pages/Casualties.aspx
IMO (2021a) Day of the seafarer campaign 2021b. International Maritime Organization (IMO), 2021b. https://www.imo.org/en/About/Events/Pages/Day-of-the-Seafarer-2021b.aspx
Khanna R (2021) The Suez canal blockage – lessons to be learned allianz online 31/3/2021 https://www.agcs.allianz.com/news-and-insights/expert-risk-articles/suez-canal-lessons-learned.html
Klockner K, Toft Y (2015) Accident modelling of railway safety occurrences: the safety and failure event network (SAFE-Net) method. Proc Manuf 3:1734–1741
Li KX, Wonham J (1999) Who is safe and who is at risk: a study of 20-year-record on accident total loss in different flags. Marit Policy Manag 26(2):137–144
Li KX, Yin J, Fan L (2014) Ship safety index. Transp Res Part A: Pol Pract 66:75–87
Lundberg J, Rollenhagen C, Hollnagel E (2009) What-you-look-for-is-what-you-find–the consequences of underlying accident models in eight accident investigation manuals. Saf Sci 47(10):1297–1311
Mahmud T, Rossette J (2007) Problems and potentials of Chittagong Port: a follow-up diagnostic study. Transpar Int Bangladesh (TIB), pp. 1–6. Available from https://ti-bangladesh.org/images/max_file/rp_ES_CTG_Port2007_en.pdf Accessed 20 Mar 2022
Manjarres-Wahlberg CJ (2022) MV Rhosus and the Beirut explosion disaster: port safety mismanagement and flag of convenience. In: The world of shipping portugal conference, pp. 26
Mazaheri A, Montewka J, Nisula J, Kujala P (2015) Usability of accident and incident reports for evidence-based risk modeling–a case study on ship grounding reports. Saf Sci 76:202–214
Notteboom TE, Winkelmans W (2001) Structural changes in logistics: how will port authorities face the challenge? Marit Policy Manag 28(1):71–89
Pallant J (2013) SPSS survival manual. McGraw-hill Education, New York
Patterson JM, Shappell SA (2010) Operator error and system deficiencies: analysis of 508 mining incidents and accidents from Queensland, Australia using HFACS. Accid Anal Prev 42(4):1379–1385
PMOU (2021) Paris memorandum of understanding – White Grey and Black List Online Available from https://www.parismou.org/detentions-banning/white-grey-and-black-list
Ratinaud P, Smyrnaios N (2016) La web sphère de #CharlieHebdo : une analyse des ré- seaux et des discours sur Twitter autour d’une contro- verse politique. ESSACHESS J Commun Stud 9(2):213–230
Razavi A, Inkpen D, Falcon R, Abielmona R (2014) Textual Risk Mining for Maritime Situational Awareness.2014 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA) At: San Antonio, TX, USA https://doi.org/10.1109/CogSIMA.2014.6816558.
RMIMA (2020) Republic of the Marshall Islands, Maritime Administrator, Delicata Casualty Investigation Report. Republic of the Marshall Islands Maritime
Sarrica M, Mingo I, Mazzara B, Leone G (2016) The effects of lemmatization on textual analysis conducted with IRaMuTeQ: results in comparison. JADT2016: 13ème Journées Internacionales d’Analyse Statistique de Données Textuelles
Shappell SA, Wiegmann DA (1997) A human error approach to accident investigation: the taxonomy of unsafe operations. Int J Aviat Psychol 7(4):269–291
Shi X, Xu D, Zhuang H, & Liu C (2022) How unsafe acts occur: an automatic text mining study, Maritime Policy & Management, 49:6, 820-830, DOI: 10.1080/03088839.2021.1894363
Silva AMB, Enumo SRF (2017) Description and analysis of psychological intervention with dancers by the software IRAMUTEQ. Trends Psychol/ Temas Em Psicologia 25(2):595–611. https://doi.org/10.9788/TP2017.2-11En
Sislian L, Jaegler A, Cariou P (2016) A literature review on port sustainability and ocean’s carrier network problem. Res Transp Bus Manag 19:19–26
Souza MA, Wall ML, Thuler AC, Lowen IM, Peres AM (2018) The use of IRAMUTEQ software for data analysis in qualitative research. Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da U S P 52: e03353
Stavroulakis PJ, Papadimitriou S (2022) Total cost of ownership in shipping: a framework for sustainability. J Shipp Trade 7(1):1–14
Stratmann, T.C., Boll, S. (2016). Demon Hunt - The Role of Endsley’s Demons of Situation Awareness in Maritime Accidents. In: , et al. Human-Centered and Error-Resilient Systems Development. HESSD HCSE 2016 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9856. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44902-9_13
Wang Z, Yin J (2020) Risk assessment of inland waterborne transportation using data mining. Marit Policy Manag 47(5):633–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1738582
Wang L, Ren Y, Wu C (2018) Effects of flare operation on landing safety: a study based on ANOVA of real flight data. Saf Sci 102:14–25
Wang Y, Zhang F, Yang Z, Yang Z (2021) Incorporation of deficiency data into the analysis of the dependency and interdependency among the risk factors influencing port state control inspection. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 206:107277
WP (2021) Suez Canal pilots come under scrutiny after grounding of ship Washington Post Online, By Sudarsan Raghavan, Adam Taylor and Ruby Mellen, 2021 EDT https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2021/03/29/suez-canal-pilots/
Wrobel K (2021) Searching for the origins of the myth: 80% human error impact on maritime safety. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 216:107942
WSJ (2021) Egyptian officials accuse ever given’s captain of losing control of ship in Suez Canal 30/5/2021 Amira El-Fekki and Jared Malsin https://www.wsj.com/articles/egyptian-officials-accuse-ever-givens-captain-of-losing-control-of-ship-in-suez-canal-11622406701
Yim J (2017) A study on the analysis and identification of seafarers’ skill-rule-knowledge inherent in maritime accidents. J Korean Soc Mar Environ Saf 23(3):224–230. https://doi.org/10.7837/kosomes.2017.23.3.224
Yip TL (2008) Port traffic risks–a study of accidents in Hong Kong waters. Transp Res Part E: Logist Transp Rev 44(5):921–931
Zhang F, Fleyeh H, Want X, Lu M (2019a) Construction site accident analysis using text mining and natural language processing techniques. Autom Constr 99(2019):238–248
Zhang L, Wang H, Meng Q, Xie H (2019b) Ship accident consequences and contributing factors analyses using ship accident investigation reports. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part o J Risk Reliab 233(1):35–47