Patients’ use of the internet for medical information
Tóm tắt
OBJECTIVES: To determine the percentage of patients enrolled in a primary care practice who use the Internet for health information, to describe the types of information sought, to evaluate patients’ perceptions of the quality of this information, and to determine if patients who use the Internet for health information discuss this with their doctors.
DESIGN: Self-administered mailed survey.
SETTING: Patients from a primary care internal medicine private practice.
PARTICIPANTS: Randomly selected patients (N=1,000) were mailed a confidential survey between December 1999 and March 2000. The response rate was 56.2%.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 512 patients who returned the survey, 53.5% (274) stated that they used the Internet for medical information. Those using the Internet for medical information were more educated (P<.001) and had higher incomes (P<.001). Respondents used the Internet for information on a broad range of medical topics. Sixty percent felt that the information on the Internet was the “same as” or “better than” information from their doctors. Of those using the Internet for health information, 59% did not discuss this information with their doctor. Neither gender, education level, nor age less than 60 years was associated with patients sharing their Web searches with their physicians. However, patients who discussed this information with their doctors rated the quality of information higher than those who did not share this information with their providers.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary care providers should recognize that patients are using the World Wide Web as a source of medical and health information and should be prepared to offer suggestions for Web-based health resources and to assist patients in evaluating the quality of medical information available on the Internet.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Pew Internet and American Life Project. The online health care revolution: how the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Available at http://www.pewinternet.org. Accessed January 17, 2001.
Cyberatlas. The mess known as online healthcare. http://cyberatlas.internet.com/big_picture/demographics/article/0,1323,5971_379231,00.html. Accessed June 18, 2000.
Eysenbach G, Sa ER, Diepgen TL. Shopping around the Internet today and tomorrow: towards the millennium of cybermedicine. BMJ. 1999;319: Available at:http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/319/7220/1294. Accessed May 28, 2000.
Eysenbach G, Diepgen TL. Patients looking for information on the Internet and seeking teleadvice: motivation, expectations, and misconceptions as expressed in e-mails sent to physicians. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135:151–6.
Mandl K, Feit S, Pena B, Kohane I. Growth and determinants of access in patient e-mail and Internet use. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000;5:508–11.
O’Connor JB, Johanson JF. Use of the Web for medical information by a gastroenterology clinic population. JAMA. 2000;284:1962–4.
Taylor MRG, Alman A, Manchester DK. Use of the Internet by patients and their families to obtain genetics-related information. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001;76:772–6.
http://www.hon.ch/. Accessed August 25, 2000.
http://www.hon.ch/Library/PapersHON/mednet_survey_mai98.html. Accessed August 25, 2000.
http://www.hon.ch/Survey/method.html. Accessed August 25, 2000.
http://www.hon.ch/cgi-bin/Survey/surv_en5.pl?stat. Accessed August 25, 2000.
Pandolfini C, Impicciatore P, Bonati M. Parents on the web: risks for quality management of cough in children. Pediatrics. 2000 Jan;105(1):e1.
Sacchetti P, Zvara P, Plante MK. The Internet and patient education resources and their reliability: focus on a select urologic topic. Urology. 1999;53:1117–20.
Impicciatore P, Pandolfini C, Casella N, Bonati M. Reliability of health information for the public on the World Wide Web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home. BMJ. 1997;314:1875–9.
Biermann JS, Golladay GJ, Greenfield ML, Baker LH. Evaluation of cancer information on the Internet. Cancer. 1999;86:381–90.
Ayonrinde O. Patients in cyberspace: information or confusion? Postgrad Med J. 1998;74:449–50.
Lindberg DA, Humphreys BL. Medicine and health on the Internet: the good, the bad, and the ugly. JAMA. 1998;280:1303–4.
Berland GK, Elliott MN, Morales LS, et al. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish. JAMA. 2001;285:2612–21.
Silberg WM, Lundberg GD, Musacchio RA. Assessing, controlling and assuring the quality of medical information on the Internet: Caveant lector et viewor—Let the reader and viewer beware. JAMA. 1997;277:1244–5.
Winker MA, Flanagin A, Chi-Lum B, et al. Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the Internet: principles governing AMA web sites. JAMA. 2000;283:1600–6.
Health on the Net Foundation—HON code of conduct. (HONcode) for medical and health Web sites. Available at: http://www.hon.ch/HONcode/conduct. Accessed May 20, 2000.
Kim P, Eng TR, Deering MJ, Maxfield A. Published criteria for evaluating health-related web sites: review. BMJ. 1999;318:647–9.
Shepperd S, Charnock D, Gann B. Helping patients access high quality health information. BMJ. 1999;319:764–6.
Jones J. Development of a self-assessment method for patients to evaluate health information on the Internet. Proc AMIA Symp. 1999:540–4.
Jadad AR, Gagliardi A. Rating health information on the Internet: navigating to knowledge or to Babel? JAMA. 1998;279:611–4.
http://www.ihealthcoalition.org. Accessed February 26, 2001.
http://www.hiethics.org. Accessed February 26, 2001.
Bader SA, Braude RM. “Patient informatics”: creating new partnerships in medical decision making. Acad Med. 1998;73:408–11.