Playing both roles in the trust game

Barr, A., 1999. The Effects of Social Disruption on Bargaining and Investment Behavior: An Experimental Study from Zimbabwe. Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford, mimeo.

Berg, 1995, Trust, reciprocity and social history, Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122, 10.1006/game.1995.1027

Binmore, 1985, Testing noncooperative bargaining theory: a preliminary study, American Economic Review, 75, 1178

Bolle, 1998, Rewarding trust: an experimental study, Theory and Decision, 45, 83, 10.1023/A:1004930101743

Bolton, 1999, ERC: a theory of equity, reciprocity and competition, American Economic Review, 90, 166, 10.1257/aer.90.1.166

Brandts, 2000, Hot versus cold: sequential responses and preference stability in experimental games, Experimental Economics, 2, 227, 10.1007/BF01669197

Carpenter, J., 2002. Information, Fairness and Reciprocity in the Best Shot Game. Economics Letters 75 (2002) 243–248.

Carter, 1991, Are economists different, and if so, why?, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 171, 10.1257/jep.5.2.171

Christie, R., Geis, F., 1970. Studies in Machiavellianism. Academic Press, New York.

Cox, J., 1999. Trust, Reciprocity, and Other-Regarding Preferences of Individuals and Groups. Department of Economics, University of Arizona, mimeo.

Eckel, 1996, Altruism in anonymous dictator games, Games and Economic Behavior, 16, 181, 10.1006/game.1996.0081

Fahr, 1999, Fairness as a constraint on trust and reciprocity: earned property rights in a reciprocal exchange experiment, Economics Letters, 66, 275, 10.1016/S0165-1765(99)00236-0

Falk, A., Fischbacher, U., 1998. A Theory of Reciprocity. Institute for Empirical Economics, University of Zurich, mimeo.

Fehr, 1999, A theory of fairness, competition and cooperation, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 769, 10.1162/003355399556151

Fehr, B., Samson, D., Paulhus, D., 1992. The Construct of Machiavellianism: Twenty Years Later, In: Spielberger, C., Butcher, J. (Eds.), Advances in Personality Assessment. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp. 77–116.

Fershtman, 2001, Trust and discrimination in a segmented society, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116, 351, 10.1162/003355301556338

Forsythe, 1994, Fairness in simple bargaining experiments, Games and Economic Behavior, 6, 347, 10.1006/game.1994.1021

Frohlich, 1992, An impartial reasoning solution to the prisoner’s dilemma, Public Choice, 74, 447, 10.1007/BF00137689

Frohlich, 1996, Experiencing impartiality to invoke fairness in the n-PD: some experimental results, Public Choice, 86, 117, 10.1007/BF00114878

Glaeser, 2000, What is social capital? The determinants of trust and trustworthiness, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115, 811, 10.1162/003355300554926

Gueth, 1990, Ultimatum bargaining behavior: a survey and comparison of experimental results, Journal of Economic Psychology, 11, 417, 10.1016/0167-4870(90)90021-Z

Gueth, 1982, An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 367, 10.1016/0167-2681(82)90011-7

Gueth, 1997, Cooperation based on trust: an experimental investigation, Journal of Economic Psychology, 18, 15, 10.1016/S0167-4870(96)00045-1

Gunnthorsdottir, A., McCabe, K., Smith, V., 2000. Using the Machiavellian Instrument to Predict Trustworthiness in a Bargaining Game. Department of Economics, University of Arizona, mimeo.

Hoffman, 1994, Preferences, property rights, and anonymity in bargaining games, Games and Economic Behavior, 7, 346, 10.1006/game.1994.1056

Hoffman, 1996, Social distance and other-regarding behavior in dictator games, American Economic Review, 86, 653

Kahneman, 1986, Fairness and the assumptions of economics, Journal of Business, 59, s285, 10.1086/296367

Konow, 2000, Fair shares: accountability and cognitive dissonance in allocation decisions, American Economic Review, 90, 1072, 10.1257/aer.90.4.1072

McCabe, K., Smith V., LePore, M., 1998. Intentionality Detection and “Mindreading”: Why Does Game Form Matter? Department of Economics, University of Arizona, mimeo

McHoskey, 1999, Machiavellianism, intrinsic versus extrinsic goals, and social interest: a self-determination theory analysis, Motivation and Emotion, 23, 267, 10.1023/A:1021338809469

McHoskey, 1999, Machiavellianism, adjustment and ethics, Psychological Reports, 85, 138, 10.2466/pr0.1999.85.1.138

McHoskey, 1998, Machiavellianism and psychopathy, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 192, 10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.192

Meyer, 1992, Norms and self-interest in ultimatum bargaining: the prince’s prudence, Journal of Economic Psychology, 13, 215, 10.1016/0167-4870(92)90031-2

Panitz, 1989, Psychometric investigation of the Mach IV scale measuring Machiavellianism, Psychological Reports, 64, 963, 10.2466/pr0.1989.64.3.963

Rabin, M., Charness, G., 1999. Understanding Social Preferences with Simple Tests; Forthcoming in Quarterly Journal of Economics.

Snijders, C., Keren, G., 1994. Giving Trust and Honoring It: An Experimental Test of Two Utility Transformations. University of Utrecht, mimeo.

Weg, 1993, On the failure to induce meager offers in ultimatum games, Journal of Economic Psychology, 14, 17, 10.1016/0167-4870(93)90038-M

Wilson, 1996, Machiavellianism: a synthesis of the evolutionary and psychological literatures, Psychological Bulletin, 119, 285, 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.285

Wilson, 1998, Individual differences in Machiavellianism as a mix of cooperative and exploitative strategies, Evolution and Human Behavior, 19, 203, 10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00011-7

Wrightsman, L., 1991. Interpersonal Trust and Attitudes Towards Human Nature. In: Robinson, J., Shaver, P., Wrightsman, L. (Eds.), Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes. Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 373–412.