Cesárea a petición de la embarazada

Fuente de la, 1992 Gleicher, 1984, Cesarean section rates in the United Status. The short-term failure of the National Consensus Development Conference in 1980, JAMA, 252, 3273, 10.1001/jama.1984.03350230033028 Taffel, 1987, Trends in the Untited States caesarean section rate and reasons for the 1980-85 rise, Am Public Health Assoc, 77, 955, 10.2105/AJPH.77.8.955 Agnews, 2006, Can a 29% caesarean delivery rate possibly be justified?, Obstet Gynecol, 108, 452, 10.1097/01.AOG.0000232163.87409.27 Chigbu, 2006, Cesarean section on request in a developing country, Int J Gynaecol Obstet Wilkinson, 1998, Is a rising caesarean section rate ivetable?, Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 105, 45, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1998.tb09349.x Quinlivan, 1999, Patient preference the leading indication for elective caesarean section in public patients-results of a 2-year prospective audit in a teaching hospital, Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 39, 207, 10.1111/j.1479-828X.1999.tb03375.x Gossman, 2006, Trends in maternal request caesarean delivery from 1991 to 2004, Obstet Gynecol, 108, 1506, 10.1097/01.AOG.0000242564.79349.b7 Gabbe, 2001, Obstetrisian’s choce of delivery, Lancet, 357, 722, 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71484-7 Mc Murgan, 2001, A national confidential survey of obstetrician’s personal preferences regarding mode of delivery, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 97, 17, 10.1016/S0301-2115(01)00423-7 Backe, 2002, Norwgan obstetrisian prefer vaginal rute of delivery, Lancet, 359, 629, 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07733-4 Does van der, 2001, Obstetrisian’s choice of delivery, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 99, 139 Habiba, 2006, Caesarean section on request: a comparison of obstetricians ́ attitudes in eight European countries, BJOG, 113, 647, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00933.x Kwee, 2004, Cesarean section on request: a survey in The Netherlands, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 113, 186, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2003.09.017 Kolás, 2003, Indications for cesarean delivery in Norway, Am J Obstet Gybecol, 188, 864, 10.1067/mob.2003.217 Cotzias, 2001, Obstetricians say yes to maternal request for elective caesarean cection: a survey of current opinion, Eur J Obstet Gynaecol, 97, 15, 10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00360-2 Wagner, 2000, Choosing caesarean section, Lancet, 356, 1677, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03169-X Rortveit, 2003, Urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery or caesarean section, N Engl J Med, 348, 9000, 10.1056/NEJMoa021788 Groutz, 2004, Cesarean section: does it prevent The development of postpartum stress urinary incontinence? A pros pective study of 363 women one year after their first delivery, Neurouro Urodyn, 23, 2, 10.1002/nau.10166 Viktrup, 2006, Risk of stress urinary incontinence twelve years after the first pregnancy and delivery, Obstet Gynecol, 108, 244, 10.1097/01.AOG.0000226860.01127.0e Feldman, 1985, Prophylactic caesarean section at term?, N Engl J Med, 312, 1265, 10.1056/NEJM198505093121926 Fretts, 2004, Should older women antepartum testing to prevent unexplained stillbirth, Obstet Gynecol, 104, 56, 10.1097/01.AOG.0000129237.93777.1a Hankins, 2006, Cesarean section on request at 39 weeks: impact on shoulder dystocia, fetal trauma, neonatal encephalophathy, and intrauterine fetal demise, Semin Perinatol, 30, 276, 10.1053/j.semperi.2006.07.009 2006 Clark, 2003, Temporal and demographic trends in cerebral palsy-fact and fiction, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 188, 628, 10.1067/mob.2003.204 1999, Ethical aspects regarding caesarean delivery for non-dedical rehaznos, Int J Obst Gynecol, 317, 317 Liu, 2005, Risk of maternal postpartum readmission associated with mode of delivery, Obstet Gynecol, 105, 836, 10.1097/01.AOG.0000154153.31193.2c Allen, 2003, Maternal morbidity associated with cesarean delivery without labor compared with spontaneous onset of labor at term, Obstet Gynecol, 102, 477, 10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00570-2 Lewis, 2004, Why Mothers Die 2000-2002 Berger, 2006 Fogelson, 2005, Neonatal impact of elective repeat caesarean delivery at term: a comment on patient choice caesarean delivery, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 192, 1433, 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.01.010 Pante, 2006, Public Health Inplication of Cesarean on Demand, Obstet Gynecol, 61, 807 Kolás, 2006, Planned cesarean versus planned vaginal delivery at tem: Comparison of newborn infant outcomes, Obstet Gynecol, 195, 1538, 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.005 Krebs, 2003, Elective cesarean delivery for term breech, Obstet Gynecol, 101, 690, 10.1016/S0029-7844(02)03073-9 Hemminki, 1996, Impact of caesarean section on future pregnancy- a review of cohort studies, Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol, 10, 366, 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1996.tb00062.x Hemminki, 1996, Long-term effects of caesarean section: ectopic pregnancy and placental problems, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 174, 1569, 10.1016/S0002-9378(96)70608-7 Smith, 2003, Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy, Lancet, 362, 1779, 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14896-9 Kwee, 2007, Obstetric management and outcome of pregnancy in women with a history of caesarean section in the Netherlands, Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 132, 171, 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.07.017 Landon, 2004, Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery, N Engl J Med, 351, 25, 10.1056/NEJMoa040405 Turner, 2006, Uterine rupture and after a previous low transverse caesarean section, BJOG, 113, 729, 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00940.x Landon, 2006, Risk of rupture with a trial of labor in women with multiple and single prior cesarean delivery, Obstet Gynecol, 108, 12, 10.1097/01.AOG.0000224694.32531.f3 Robson, 2001, Can we reduce the caesarean section rate?, Best Pract Res Clinc Obstet Gynaecol, 15, 179, 10.1053/beog.2000.0156 Hannah, 2000, Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomized multicentric trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group, Lancet, 356, 1375, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02840-3 Glezerman, 2006, Five years to the breech trial: the rise and fall of a randomized controlled trial, Am J Obstet Gynecol, 194, 20, 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.08.039 Doyle, 2005, Outcomes of term vaginal breech delivery, Am J Perinatol, 22, 325, 10.1055/s-2005-871530 2006, Mode of term singleton breech delivery, Obstet Gynecol, 108, 235, 10.1097/00006250-200607000-00058 Jiang HJ, Elixhauser A, Nicholas J, Steiner C, Reyes C, Bieman AS. Care of women in US hospitals, 2000 HCUP fact book number 3. AHRQ publication n.° 02-0044 [citado 12 Ene 2007]. Disponible en: http://www.ahrq.gov/data/hcup/factbk3/factbk3.htm Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Ventura SJ. Prelimirary Data for 2004 [citado 12 Ene 2007]. Disponible en: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr54/nvsr54 Bettes, 2007, Cesarean delibery on Maternal request: Obstetrician-Gynecologists’ Konowledge, Perception, and Practice Patterns, Obstet Gynecol, 109, 57, 10.1097/01.AOG.0000249608.11864.b6