Synergies Among Monetary, Multidimensional and Subjective Poverty: Evidence from Nepal

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 125 - Trang 103-125 - 2014
Shabana Mitra1
1Centre for Public Policy, Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, Bengaluru, India

Tóm tắt

In this paper we construct a Nepal specific multidimensional poverty index using the Nepal Longitudinal Sample Survey (NLSS) for the period 1995–2010. The indicators for Nepal Multidimensional Poverty Index (NMP) have been chosen using the goals set by the Government of Nepal and the perceptions of adequacy as reported by households. In doing so this study combines multidimensional and subjective methods of measuring wellbeing. The subjective data is used to guide the choice of dimensions for the multidimensional analysis. Our findings show that Nepal has had a dramatic fall in multidimensional poverty along with the observed fall in consumption poverty in this period. Comparing the extent to which consumption poverty accurately identifies the multidimensionally poor, we find the error has reduced over time but remains large in proportion to the poverty rate implying the need for a multidimensional measure. For the different ethnic groups and regions the patterns of reduction in poverty are not homogenous and are different from those of consumption poverty with the NMP outperforming the consumption poverty in tracking targeted policy actions.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alkire, S., & Foster, J. E. (2011). Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7–8), 476–487. Alkire, S., & Foster, J. E. (2011b). Understandings and misunderstandings of multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Economic Inequality, 9, 289–314. Alkire, S., & Santos, M.E. (2010). Acute multidimensional poverty: A new Index for developing countries. Working paper 38, Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative, University of Oxford. Baland, J. M., Bardhan, P., Das, S., Mookherjee, D., & Sarkar, R. (2010). The environmental impact of poverty: Evidence from firewood collection in rural Nepal. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 59(1), 23–61. Blaikie, P., Cameron, J., & Seddon, D. (2002). Understanding 20 years of change in west-central Nepal: Continuity and change in lives and idea. World Development, 30(7), 1255–1270. CONEVAL. (2007). Nota Técnica sobre la Aplicación de la Metodología para la Medición de la Pobreza por Ingresos y Pruebas de Hipótesis 2006. Nota Técnica 001/2007, July 2007, Mexico City, Mexico. Diener, E., & Biswas-Diener, R. (2002). Will money increase subjective well-being? Social Indicators Research, 57, 119–169. Do, Q. T., & Iyer, L. (2010). Geography, poverty and conflict in Nepal. Journal of Peace Research, 47(6), 735–748. Ferreira, F. H. G., & Lugo, M. A. (2012). Multidimensional poverty analysis: Looking for a middle ground. World Bank Policy research working paper no. 5964, World Bank, Washington, DC. Hoyos, A., & Narayan, A. (2010). Inequality of opportunities among children: How much does gender matter? WDR background paper. World Bank. Israeli, O. (2007). A Shapley-based decomposition of the R-squared of a linear regression. Journal of Economic Inequality, 2, 199–212. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspective, 20(1), 3–24. Kapteyn, A., Kooreman, P., & Willemse, R. (1988). Some methodological issues in the implementation of subjective poverty definitions. The Journal of Human resources, 23(2), 222–242. Kingdon, G. G., & Knight, J. (2006). Subjective well-being poverty vs income poverty and capability poverty? Journal of Development Studies, 42(7), 1199–1224. Narayan, D., Patel, R., Schafft, K., Rademacher, A., & Koch-Schulte, S. (2000). Voices of the poor: Can anyone hear us?. New York: World Bank, Oxford University Press. Palomar Lever, J. (2004). Poverty and subjective well-being in Mexico. Social Indicators Research, 68, 1–33. Pradhan, M., & Ravallion, M. (2000). Measuring poverty using qualitative perceptions of welfare. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(3), 462–471. Ravallion, M. (2011). On multidimensional indices of poverty. Journal of Economic Inequality, 9, 235–248. Ravallion, M., & Lokshin, M. (2001). Identifying welfare effects from subjective questions. Economica, 68, 335–357. Shorrocks, A. F. (1999). Decomposition procedures for distributional analysis: A unified framework based on the Shapley value, Mimeo. Three Year Interim Plan. (2007/08–2009/10). Development plan, Nepal, http://www.npc.gov.np/new/uploadedFiles/allFiles/11tyip_eng.pdf. United Nations Development Programme. (1999). Human development report 1999. New York: Oxford University Press. United Nations Development Programme. (2011a). The millennium development goals report. New York: United Nations. United Nations Development Programme. (2011b). Human development report 2011. New York: Oxford University Press. Wagle, U. (2005). Multidimensional poverty measurement with economic well-being, capability and social inclusion: A case from Kathmandu, Nepal. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 6(3), 301–328. WHO/UNICEF Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and Sanitation. (2012). Progress on Drinking Water and Sanitation. World Bank. (2011). West Bank and Gaza coping with conflict? Poverty and inclusion in the West Bank and Gaza. Report no. 61293-GZ, World Bank.