Etude des perceptions d’équité des candidats dans une situation de sélection: influence de la justice procédurale et distributive

Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations - Tập 19 - Trang 45-70 - 2013
Laurence Marzucco1, Isabelle Hansez1
1Unité de Valorisation des Ressources Humaines, Faculté de Psychologie et des Sciences de l’Education. Université de Liège, Boulevard du Rectorat, 5/Bat. B-32, 4000 Liège, BELGIQUE.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Adams, 1965, Inequity in social exchange, 267, 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2 Anderson, 2001, Recruitment and selection: Applicant perspectives and outcomes, 200 Bauer, 1998, Longitudinal assessment of applicant reactions to employment testing and test outcome feedback [Electronic version], Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 892, 10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.892 Bauer, 2001, Applicant reactions to selection: Development of the selection procedural justice scale (SPJS) [Electronic version], Personnel Psychology, 54, 387, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00097.x Byrne, 2001, The history of organizationel justice: The founders speak, 3 Chan, 2004, An agenda for future research on applicant reactions to selection procedures: A construct-oriented approach [Electronic version], International Journal of Selction and Assessment, 12, 9, 10.1111/j.0965-075X.2004.00260.x Chan, 1997, Reactions to cognitive ability tests: The relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test taking motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 300 Camerman, 2006, Justice et processus d'échange sociaux dans les organisations: Une analyse des dimensions et des effets de la justice organisationnelle Colquitt, 2005, What is organizational justice? A historical overview, 3 Cropanzano, 1997, Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze Cropanzano, 2003, Procedural justice and organizational staffing: A tale of two paradigms [Electronic version], Human Ressource Management Review, 13, 7, 10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00097-9 Folger, 1998 Gatewood, 2008 Gilliland, 1993, The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective [Electronic version], The Academy of Management Review, 18, 694, 10.5465/amr.1993.9402210155 Gilliland, 1994, Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system [Electronic version], Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 691, 10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.691 Gilliland, 2001, Justice in organisations: Theory, methods and applications, 143 Gilliand, 2001, Causes and consequences of unfairness of applicant fairness Greenberg, 1990, Organizational justice: Yesterday, today and tomorrow [Electronic version], Journal of Management, 16, 399, 10.1177/014920639001600208 Greenberg, 2001, VII Hausknecht, 2004, Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis [Electronic version], Personnel Psychology, 57, 639, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00003.x Huffcutt, 1984, Hunter and Hunter revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 184, 10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.184 Konovsky, 2000, Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations [Electronic version], Journal of Management, 26, 489, 10.1177/014920630002600306 Latham, 1993, Perceived practicality of unstructured patterned and situational interviews, 41 Latham, 1980, The situational interview [Electronic version], Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 422, 10.1037/0021-9010.65.4.422 Lind, 1988 McDaniel, 1994, The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599, 10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.599 Maurer, 1997, The potential of the situational interview: Existing research and unresolved issues [Electronic version], Human Resource Management Review, 7, 185, 10.1016/S1053-4822(97)90022-X Ployhart, 1997, Toward an explanation of applicant reactions: An examination of organizational justice and attribution frameworks [Electronic version], Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 308, 10.1006/obhd.1997.2742 Ployhart, 1998, Applicants’ reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: The effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement [Electronic version], Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 3, 10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.3 Ployhart, 1999, Explanations for selection decisions: Applicants' reactions to informational and sensitivity features of explanations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 87, 10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.87 Ryan, 2000, Applicants’ perceptions of selection procedures and decisions: A critical review and agenda for the future [Electronic version], Journal of Management, 26, 565, 10.1177/014920630002600308 Rynes, 1993, Applicant reactions to alternative selection procedures, Journal of Business and Psychology, 7, 261, 10.1007/BF01015754 Shapiro, 2001, The death of justice theory is likely if theorists neglect the “wheels” already invented and the voices of the injustice victims, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 235, 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1795 Singh, 2006, Book review [Electronic version], Psychology and Developing Societies, 18, 241, 10.1177/097133360601800206 Smither, 1993, Applicant reactions to selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 46, 49 Steiner, 2004, Les perceptions de la justice organisationnelle en entretien de recrutement: Deux expérimentations par simulation [Electronic version], Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 10, 111, 10.1016/j.pto.2004.04.006 Steiner, 1996, Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 134, 10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.134 Thibaut, 1975 Truxillo, 2001, Multiple dimensions of procedural justice: Longitudinal effects on selection system fairness and test- taking self-efficacy [Electronic version], International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 336, 10.1111/1468-2389.00185 Truxillo, 2004, The importance of organizational justice: Defining when selection fairness really matters [Electronic version], International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 39, 10.1111/j.0965-075X.2004.00262.x