Etude des perceptions d’équité des candidats dans une situation de sélection: influence de la justice procédurale et distributive
Tài liệu tham khảo
Adams, 1965, Inequity in social exchange, 267, 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2
Anderson, 2001, Recruitment and selection: Applicant perspectives and outcomes, 200
Bauer, 1998, Longitudinal assessment of applicant reactions to employment testing and test outcome feedback [Electronic version], Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 892, 10.1037/0021-9010.83.6.892
Bauer, 2001, Applicant reactions to selection: Development of the selection procedural justice scale (SPJS) [Electronic version], Personnel Psychology, 54, 387, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2001.tb00097.x
Byrne, 2001, The history of organizationel justice: The founders speak, 3
Chan, 2004, An agenda for future research on applicant reactions to selection procedures: A construct-oriented approach [Electronic version], International Journal of Selction and Assessment, 12, 9, 10.1111/j.0965-075X.2004.00260.x
Chan, 1997, Reactions to cognitive ability tests: The relationships between race, test performance, face validity perceptions, and test taking motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 300
Camerman, 2006, Justice et processus d'échange sociaux dans les organisations: Une analyse des dimensions et des effets de la justice organisationnelle
Colquitt, 2005, What is organizational justice? A historical overview, 3
Cropanzano, 1997, Progress in organizational justice: Tunneling through the maze
Cropanzano, 2003, Procedural justice and organizational staffing: A tale of two paradigms [Electronic version], Human Ressource Management Review, 13, 7, 10.1016/S1053-4822(02)00097-9
Folger, 1998
Gatewood, 2008
Gilliland, 1993, The perceived fairness of selection systems: An organizational justice perspective [Electronic version], The Academy of Management Review, 18, 694, 10.5465/amr.1993.9402210155
Gilliland, 1994, Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system [Electronic version], Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 691, 10.1037/0021-9010.79.5.691
Gilliland, 2001, Justice in organisations: Theory, methods and applications, 143
Gilliand, 2001, Causes and consequences of unfairness of applicant fairness
Greenberg, 1990, Organizational justice: Yesterday, today and tomorrow [Electronic version], Journal of Management, 16, 399, 10.1177/014920639001600208
Greenberg, 2001, VII
Hausknecht, 2004, Applicant reactions to selection procedures: An updated model and meta-analysis [Electronic version], Personnel Psychology, 57, 639, 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2004.00003.x
Huffcutt, 1984, Hunter and Hunter revisited: Interview validity for entry-level jobs, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 184, 10.1037/0021-9010.79.2.184
Konovsky, 2000, Understanding procedural justice and its impact on business organizations [Electronic version], Journal of Management, 26, 489, 10.1177/014920630002600306
Latham, 1993, Perceived practicality of unstructured patterned and situational interviews, 41
Latham, 1980, The situational interview [Electronic version], Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 422, 10.1037/0021-9010.65.4.422
Lind, 1988
McDaniel, 1994, The validity of employment interviews: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 599, 10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.599
Maurer, 1997, The potential of the situational interview: Existing research and unresolved issues [Electronic version], Human Resource Management Review, 7, 185, 10.1016/S1053-4822(97)90022-X
Ployhart, 1997, Toward an explanation of applicant reactions: An examination of organizational justice and attribution frameworks [Electronic version], Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 72, 308, 10.1006/obhd.1997.2742
Ployhart, 1998, Applicants’ reactions to the fairness of selection procedures: The effects of positive rule violations and time of measurement [Electronic version], Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 3, 10.1037/0021-9010.83.1.3
Ployhart, 1999, Explanations for selection decisions: Applicants' reactions to informational and sensitivity features of explanations, Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 87, 10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.87
Ryan, 2000, Applicants’ perceptions of selection procedures and decisions: A critical review and agenda for the future [Electronic version], Journal of Management, 26, 565, 10.1177/014920630002600308
Rynes, 1993, Applicant reactions to alternative selection procedures, Journal of Business and Psychology, 7, 261, 10.1007/BF01015754
Shapiro, 2001, The death of justice theory is likely if theorists neglect the “wheels” already invented and the voices of the injustice victims, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58, 235, 10.1006/jvbe.2001.1795
Singh, 2006, Book review [Electronic version], Psychology and Developing Societies, 18, 241, 10.1177/097133360601800206
Smither, 1993, Applicant reactions to selection procedures. Personnel Psychology, 46, 49
Steiner, 2004, Les perceptions de la justice organisationnelle en entretien de recrutement: Deux expérimentations par simulation [Electronic version], Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 10, 111, 10.1016/j.pto.2004.04.006
Steiner, 1996, Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States, Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 134, 10.1037/0021-9010.81.2.134
Thibaut, 1975
Truxillo, 2001, Multiple dimensions of procedural justice: Longitudinal effects on selection system fairness and test- taking self-efficacy [Electronic version], International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 336, 10.1111/1468-2389.00185
Truxillo, 2004, The importance of organizational justice: Defining when selection fairness really matters [Electronic version], International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 12, 39, 10.1111/j.0965-075X.2004.00262.x