Multiple regression on distance matrices: a multivariate spatial analysis tool

Plant Ecology - Tập 188 - Trang 117-131 - 2006
Jeremy W. Lichstein1
1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, USA

Tóm tắt

I explore the use of multiple regression on distance matrices (MRM), an extension of partial Mantel analysis, in spatial analysis of ecological data. MRM involves a multiple regression of a response matrix on any number of explanatory matrices, where each matrix contains distances or similarities (in terms of ecological, spatial, or other attributes) between all pair-wise combinations of n objects (sample units); tests of statistical significance are performed by permutation. The method is flexible in terms of the types of data that may be analyzed (counts, presence–absence, continuous, categorical) and the shapes of response curves. MRM offers several advantages over traditional partial Mantel analysis: (1) separating environmental distances into distinct distance matrices allows inferences to be made at the level of individual variables; (2) nonparametric or nonlinear multiple regression methods may be employed; and (3) spatial autocorrelation may be quantified and tested at different spatial scales using a series of lag matrices, each representing a geographic distance class. The MRM lag matrices model may be parameterized to yield very similar inferences regarding spatial autocorrelation as the Mantel correlogram. Unlike the correlogram, however, the lag matrices model may also include environmental distance matrices, so that spatial patterns in species abundance distances (community similarity) may be quantified while controlling for the environmental similarity between sites. Examples of spatial analyses with MRM are presented.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Augustin N.H., Mugglestone M.A. and Buckland S.T. (1996). An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife. J. Appl. Ecol. 33:339–347 Bergeron Y. (1991). The influence of island and mainland lakeshore landscapes on boreal forest fire regimes. Ecology 72:1980–1992 Borcard D. and Legendre P. (1994). Environmental control and spatial structure in ecological communities: an example using oribatid mites (Acari, Oribatei). Environ. Ecol. Stat. 1:37–61 Borcard D., Legendre P., Avois-Jacquet C., and Tuomisto H. (2004). Dissecting the spatial structure of ecological data at multiple scales. Ecology 85:1826–1832 Borcard D., Legendre P. and Drapeau P. (1992). Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045–1055 Condit R., Pitman N., Leigh E.G., Chave J., Terborgh J., Foster R.B., Nuñez P., Aguilar S., Valencia R., Villa G., Muller-Landau H.C., Losos E., and Hubbell S.P. (2002). Beta-diversity in tropical forest trees. Science 295:666–669 Dutilleul P., Stockwell J.D., Frigon D. and Legendre P. (2000). The Mantel test versus Pearson’s correlation analysis: assessment of the differences for biological and environmental studies. J. Agricult. Biol. Environ. Stat. 5:131–150 Everham E. M. and Brokaw N.V.L. (1996). Forest damage and recovery from catastrophic wind. Bot. Rev. 62:113–185 Fortin M.-J. and Payette S. (2002). How to test the significance of the relation between spatially autocorrelated data at the landscape scale: a case study using fire and forest maps. Ecoscience 9:213–218 Insightful Corporation (2002). SPLUS version 6.1. Insightful Corporation, Seattle Johnson E.A. (1992). Fire and Vegetation Dynamics: Studies from the North American Boreal Forest. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Legendre P. (1993). Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm. Ecology 74:1659–1673 Legendre P. (2000). Comparison of permutation methods for the partial correlation and partial Mantel tests. J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 67:37–73 Legendre P., Borcard D., and Peres-Neto P.R. (2005). Analyzing beta diversity: partitioning the spatial variation of community composition data. Ecol. Monogr. 75:435–450 Legendre P. and Gallagher E.D. (2001). Ecologically meaningful transformations for ordination of species data. Oecologia 129:271–280 Legendre P., Lapointe F.-J. and Casgrain P. (1994). Modeling brain evolution from behavior: a permutational regression approach. Evolution 48:1487–1499 Legendre P. and Legendre L. (1998). Numerical Ecology, 2nd English edition. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam Lichstein J.W., Grau H.R., and Aragón R. (2004). Recruitment limitation in a subtropical landscape mosaic: impact of an exotic tree invasion. J. Veget. Sci. 15:721–728 Lichstein J.W., Simons T.R., Shriner S.A., and Franzreb K.E. (2002). Spatial autocorrelation and autoregressive models in ecology. Ecol. Monogr. 72:445–463 Manly B.F. (1986). Randomization and regression methods for testing for associations with geographical, environmental and biological distances between populations. Res. Popul. Ecol. 28:201–218 Mantel N.A. (1967). The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res. 27:209–220 Nekola J.C. and White P.S. (1999). The distance decay of similarity in biogeography and ecology. J. Biogeogr. 26:867–878 Oden N.L. and Sokal R.R. (1986). Directional autocorrelation: an extension of spatial correlograms to two dimensions. System. Zool. 35:608–617 Oden N.L. and Sokal R.R. (1992). An investigation of three-matrix permutation tests. J. Classif. 9:275–290 Raufaste N. and Rousset F. (2001). Are partial Mantel tests adequate?. Evolution 55:1703–1705 Rawlings J.O., Pantula S.G. and Dickey D.A. (1998). Applied Regression Analysis: A Research Tool. 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, New York Rossi R.E., Mulla D.J., Journel A.G. and Franz E.H. (1992). Geostatistical tools for modeling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence. Ecol. Monogr. 62:277–314 Selmi S. and Boulinier T. (2001). Ecological biogeography of Southern Ocean islands: the importance of considering spatial issues. Am. Nat. 158:426–437 Smouse P.E., Long J.C. and Sokal R.R. (1986). Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Syst. Zool. 35:627–632 Sokal R.R. (1986). Spatial data analysis and historical processes. In: Diday E., Escoufier Y., Lebart L., Pages J., Schektman Y. and Tomassone R. (eds), Data Analysis and Informatics, IV. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, pp. 29–43 Sokal R.R. and Oden N.L. (1978). Spatial autocorrelation in biology 2. Some biological implications and four applications of evolutionary and ecological interest. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 10:229–249 Tuomisto H., Ruokolainen K. and Yli-Halla M. (2003). Dispersal, environment, and floristic variation of western Amazonian forests. Science 299:241–244 Urban D., Goslee S., Pierce K. and Lookingbill T. (2002). Extending community ecology to landscapes. Ecoscience 9:200–212 Wenny D. G. and Levey D.J. (1998). Directed seed dispersal by bellbirds in a tropical cloud forest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:6204–6207 Yee T.W. and Mitchell N.D. (1991). Generalized additive models in plant ecology. J. Veget. Sci. 2:587–602