Update on Robotic Pancreatic Surgery
Tóm tắt
This review serves as an update on the status of robotic pancreatic surgery. It will focus on major changes in the adoption, safety, patient selection, and procedural refinements in robotic pancreatic surgery over the past 5 years. While the findings of this review support the notion that adoption of robotic pancreatic surgery is growing, it is still challenged by the long learning curve. A curriculum has been constructed and disseminated to address this issue. Furthermore, multiple international meetings have been organized to set helpful recommendations and guidelines. Robotic pancreatic surgery is a growing platform that is expected to expand with further advancements in technology and increased adoption of the new generation of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgeons.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB. Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(1):e1918911. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911.
Joyce D, Morris-Stiff G, Falk GA, El-Hayek K, Chalikonda S, Walsh RM. Robotic surgery of the pancreas. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(40):14726–32. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v20.i40.14726.
van Hilst J, de Rooij T, Abu Hilal M, Asbun HJ, Barkun J, Boggi U, et al. Worldwide survey on opinions and use of minimally invasive pancreatic resection. HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(3):190–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.011.
Asbun HJ, Stauffer JA. Laparoscopic vs open pancreaticoduodenectomy: overall outcomes and severity of complications using the Accordion Severity Grading System. J Am Coll Surg. 2012;215(6):810–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.08.006.
Konstantinidis IT, Ituarte P, Woo Y, Warner SG, Melstrom K, Kim J, et al. Trends and outcomes of robotic surgery for gastrointestinal (GI) cancers in the USA: maintaining perioperative and oncologic safety. Surg Endosc. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-019-07284-x.
• Vollmer CM, Asbun HJ, Barkun J, Besselink MG, Boggi U, Conlon KC, et al. Proceedings of the first international state-of-the-art conference on minimally-invasive pancreatic resection (MIPR). HPB (Oxford). 2017;19(3):171–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.015. This is the landmark consensus meeting that discussed important aspects of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery application and challenges of adoption.
Harbour R, Miller J. A new system for grading recommendations in evidence based guidelines. BMJ. 2001;323(7308):334–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7308.334.
Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, Burgers JS, Cluzeau F, Feder G, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ. 2010;182(18):E839–E842842. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.090449.
• Liu R, Wakabayashi G, Palanivelu C, Tsung A, Yang K, Goh BKP, et al. International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr. 2019;8(4):345–60. https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn.2019.07.08. This is the landmark consensus meeting that discussed important aspects of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery application and challenges of adoption.
Moekotte AL, Rawashdeh A, Asbun HJ, Coimbra FJ, Edil BH, Jarufe N, et al. Safe implementation of minimally invasive pancreas resection: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford). 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpb.2019.11.005.
Tam V, Zenati M, Novak S, Chen Y, Zureikat AH, Zeh HJ 3rd, et al. Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy biotissue curriculum has validity and improves technical performance for surgical oncology fellows. J Surg Educ. 2017;74(6):1057–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.05.016.
Hogg ME, Tam V, Zenati M, Novak S, Miller J, Zureikat AH, et al. Mastery-based virtual reality robotic simulation curriculum: the first step toward operative robotic proficiency. J Surg Educ. 2017;74(3):477–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2016.10.015.
Fernandes E, Elli E, Giulianotti P. The role of the dual console in robotic surgical training. Surgery. 2014;155(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2013.06.023.
Mark Knab L, Zenati MS, Khodakov A, Rice M, Al-Abbas A, Bartlett DL, et al. Evolution of a novel robotic training curriculum in a complex general surgical oncology fellowship. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018;25(12):3445–522. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6686-0.
Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Perrone VG, Miccoli M, Brozzetti S, Boggi U. The learning curve in robotic distal pancreatectomy. Updates Surg. 2015;67(3):257–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-015-0299-y.
Takahashi C, Shridhar R, Huston J, Meredith K. Outcomes associated with robotic approach to pancreatic resections. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2018;9(5):936–41. https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo.2018.08.04.
Benizri EI, Germain A, Ayav A, Bernard JL, Zarnegar R, Benchimol D, et al. Short-term perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. J Robot Surg. 2014;8(2):125–32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-013-0438-8.
Shakir M, Boone BA, Polanco PM, Zenati MS, Hogg ME, Tsung A, et al. The learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy: an analysis of outcomes of the first 100 consecutive cases at a high-volume pancreatic centre. HPB (Oxford). 2015;17(7):580–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/hpb.12412.
Stiles ZE, Dickson PV, Deneve JL, Glazer ES, Dong L, Wan JY, et al. The impact of unplanned conversion to an open procedure during minimally invasive pancreatectomy. J Surg Res. 2018;227:168–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2018.02.028.
Klompmaker S, van Zoggel DM, Watkins AA, Eskander MF, Tseng JF, Besselink MG, et al. Nationwide evaluation of patient selection for minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy using American College of Surgeons' National Quality improvement program. Ann Surg. 2017;266(6):1055–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001982.
• Asbun HJ, Moekotte AL, Vissers FL, Kunzler F, Cipriani F, Alseidi A, et al. The Miami International Evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection. Ann Surg. 2020;271(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000003590. This is the landmark consensus meeting that discussed important aspects of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery application and challenges of adoption.
Cai J, Ramanathan R, Zenati MS, Al Abbas A, Hogg ME, Zeh HJ, et al. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with decreased clinically relevant pancreatic fistulas: a propensity-matched analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-019-04274-1.
Jin JB, Qin K, Li H, Wu ZC, Zhan Q, Deng XX, et al. Robotic enucleation for benign or borderline tumours of the pancreas: a retrospective analysis and comparison from a high-volume centre in Asia. World J Surg. 2016;40(12):3009–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3655-2.
Hamad A, Novak S, Hogg ME. Robotic central pancreatectomy. J Vis Surg. 2017;3:94. https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2017.05.13.
Konstantinidis IT, Jutric Z, Eng OS, Warner SG, Melstrom LG, Fong Y, et al. Robotic total pancreatectomy with splenectomy: technique and outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(8):3691–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-6003-1.
Zureikat AH, Nguyen T, Boone BA, Wijkstrom M, Hogg ME, Humar A, et al. Robotic total pancreatectomy with or without autologous islet cell transplantation: replication of an open technique through a minimal access approach. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(1):176–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3656-x.
Galvani CA, Rilo HR, Samame J, Gruessner RW. First fully robotic-assisted total pancreatectomy combined with islet autotransplant for the treatment of chronic pancreatitis: a case report. Pancreas. 2013;42(7):1188–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPA.0b013e31827fe875.
Hamad A, Zenati MS, Nguyen TK, Hogg ME, Zeh HJ 3rd, Zureikat AH. Safety and feasibility of the robotic platform in the management of surgical sequelae of chronic pancreatitis. Surg Endosc. 2018;32(2):1056–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-6010-2.