High rates of perforation are found in endovaginal ultrasound probe covers before and after oocyte retrieval forin vitro fertilization-embryo transfer

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 12 - Trang 606-609 - 1995
Michael Hignett1,2, Paul Claman1
1Goal Programme, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Ottawa Civic Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
2Organon Research Fellow in the Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Ottawa, Canada

Tóm tắt

To study perforation rates of sterile transvaginal ultrasound probe covers before and after oocyte retrieval (OPU) in an IVF-ET program. Transvaginal ultrasound probe sheaths from two different manufacturers were studied, Cook Innoray (Cook-Canada #TTUPS-100) and Swemed Lab (Frolunda Sweden #715). After controlled ovarian stimulation, OPU was done using the needle guide of a sterile sheathed 5-MHz transvaginal ultrasound transducer (ATL Bothell, Washington, USA). A newer designed Cook probe cover supplied by the manufacturer was also tested after the company was made aware of our initial perforation results. Following each OPU, probe covers were examined for perforations by filling them with water and checking for leaks. If perforations were found, the vaginal transducer was disinfected by soaking for 20 min in 2% gluteraldehyde (Formac ®).Twenty unused sterile probe covers from each manufacturer were also tested for perforations. After OPU we found 10/13 (75%) old Cook, and 35/43 (81%) Swemed probe covers to be perforated (NS). Only 5/20 (25%) of the new design Cook probe covers were perforated post OPU (P =0.000005). Analysis of unused probe covers revealed 13/20 (65%) Cook, and 5/20 (25%) Swemed probe covers to be perforated (P =0.02). None of 10 new design unused Cook probe covers were perforated before use. Sterile transvaginal ultrasound probe covers have a very high rate of perforation even before use. It is important to examine probe covers for perforations after OPU procedures and to disinfect them as necessary to avoid the risk of sexually transmitted disease. Quality control between brands seems to vary and efforts should be made to develop a cooperative relationship with manufacturers to improve design and quality control in production of ultrasound probe covers used for IVF procedures.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Jimenez R, Duff P: Sheathing of the endovaginal ultrasound probe: is it adequate? Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 1993;1:37–39 Dodds RD, Barker SGE, Morgan NH, Donaldson DR, Thomas MH: Self protection in surgery: the use of double gloves. Br J Surg 1990;77:219–220 Cole RP, Gault DT: Glove perforation during plastic surgery. Br J Plast Surg 1989;42:481–483 Maffali N, Capasso G, Testa V: Glove perforation in elective orthopaedic surgery. ACTA Ortho Scand 1989;60:565–566 Chapman S, Duff P: Frequency of glove perforations and subsequent blood contact in association with selective obstetric surgical procedures. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:1354–1357 Bennett B, Duff P: The effect of double gloving on frequency of glove perforations. Obstet Gynecol 1993;78:1019–1021 Odwin C, Fleischer AC, Kepple DM, Chiang DT: Probe covers and disinfectants for transvaginal transducers. J Diag Med Sonog 1990;6:130–135 Benson WG: Exposure to glutaraldehyde. J Soc Occup Med 1984;34:63–66