Post-capture processes contribute to statistical learning of distractor locations in visual search

Cortex - Tập 135 - Trang 108-126 - 2021
Marian Sauter1,2, Nina M. Hanning2, Heinrich R. Liesefeld2, Hermann J. Müller2
1Institut für Psychologie, Universität der Bundeswehr München, Munich, Germany
2Department Psychologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Munich, Germany

Tài liệu tham khảo

Allenmark, 2019, Probability cueing of singleton-distractor regions in visual search: The locus of spatial distractor suppression is determined by colour swapping, Visual Cognition, 27, 1 Becker, 2008, The mechanism of priming: Episodic retrieval or priming of pop-out?, Acta Psychologica, 127, 324, 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.07.005 Becker, 2009, Can intertrial priming account for the similarity effect in visual search?, Vision Research, 49, 1738, 10.1016/j.visres.2009.04.001 Born, 2011, Evidence for a dissociation between the control of oculomotor capture and disengagement, Experimental Brain Research, 208, 621, 10.1007/s00221-010-2510-1 Brainard, 1997, The psychophysics toolbox, Spatial Vision, 10, 433, 10.1163/156856897X00357 Bravo, 1992, The role of attention in different visual-search tasks, Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 465, 10.3758/BF03211642 Caddigan, 2010, Saccadic repulsion in pop-out search: How a target's dodgy history can push the eyes away from it, Journal of Vision, 10, 9, 10.1167/10.14.9 Cornelissen, 2002, The eyelink toolbox: Eye tracking with MATLAB and the psychophysics toolbox, Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 613, 10.3758/BF03195489 Deubel, 1996, Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism, Vision Research, 36, 1827, 10.1016/0042-6989(95)00294-4 Di Caro, 2019, Suppression history of distractor location biases attentional and oculomotor control, Visual Cognition, 27, 1, 10.1080/13506285.2019.1617376 Druker, 2010, Spatial probability aids visual stimulus discrimination, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 63 Engbert, 2006, Microsaccades are triggered by low retinal image slip, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 7192, 10.1073/pnas.0509557103 Faul, 2014 Fecteau, 2009, Location and color biases have different influences on selective attention, Vision Research, 49, 996, 10.1016/j.visres.2009.03.013 Ferrante, 2018, Altering spatial priority maps via statistical learning of target selection and distractor filtering, Cortex, 102, 67, 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.09.027 Findlay, 1997, Saccade target selection during visual search, Vision Research, 37, 617, 10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00218-0 Folk, 1998, Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 847 Found, 1996, Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account, Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 88, 10.3758/BF03205479 Fukuda, 2010, Individual differences in recovery time from attentional capture, Psychological Science, 22, 361, 10.1177/0956797611398493 Gabbay, 2019, Splitting the attentional spotlight? Evidence from attentional capture by successive events visual, Cognition, 27, 1 Geng, 2001, Probability cuing of target location facilitates visual search implicitly in normal participants and patients with hemispatial neglect, Psychological Science, 13, 520, 10.1111/1467-9280.00491 Geng, 2005, Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search, Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1252, 10.3758/BF03193557 Geng, 2010, Attentional capture by a perceptually salient non-target facilitates target processing through inhibition and rapid rejection, Journal of Vision, 10, 5, 10.1167/10.6.5 Godijn, 2002, Oculomotor capture and Inhibition of Return: Evidence for an oculomotor suppression account of IOR, Psychological Research, 66, 234, 10.1007/s00426-002-0098-1 Goschy, 2014, Probability cueing of distractor locations: Both intertrial facilitation and statistical learning mediate interference reduction, Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1195, 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01195 Hickey, 2011, Context and competition in the capture of visual attention. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73, 2053, 10.3758/s13414-011-0168-9 Huang, 2004, Repetition priming in visual search: Episodic retrieval, not feature priming, Memory & Cognition, 32, 12, 10.3758/BF03195816 Ishihara, 1918, Tests for color blindness, American Journal of Ophthalmology, 1, 376, 10.1016/S0002-9394(18)90663-X Koch, 2013, Distractors less salient than targets capture attention rather than producing non-spatial filtering costs, Acta Psychologica, 144, 61, 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.04.023 Kowler, 1995, The role of attention in the programming of saccades, Vision Research, 35, 1897, 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00279-U Liesefeld, 2019, Distractor-interference reduction is dimensionally constrained, Visual Cognition, 27, 1 Liesefeld, 2018, Processes of visuospatial attention and working memory, Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences, 87, 10.1007/7854_2018_75 Liesefeld, 2017, Attentional capture in visual search: Capture and post-capture dynamics revealed by EEG, Neuroimage, 156, 166, 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.016 Liesefeld, 2016, Search efficiency as a function of target saliency: The transition from inefficient to efficient search and beyond, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42, 821 Liesefeld, 2019, Distractor handling via dimension weighting, Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 160, 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.03.003 Liesefeld, 2020, Modulations of saliency signals at two hierarchical levels of priority computations revealed by spatial statistical distractor learning, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 10.1037/xge0000970 Liesefeld, 2020, A theoretical attempt to revive the serial/parallel-search dichotomy, Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 82, 228, 10.3758/s13414-019-01819-z Maljkovic, 1994, Priming of pop-out: I. Role of features, Memory & Cognition, 22, 657, 10.3758/BF03209251 Mulckhuyse, 2009, Early and late modulation of saccade deviations by target distractor similarity, Journal of Neurophysiology, 102, 1451, 10.1152/jn.00068.2009 Müller, 2009, Attentional capture by salient color singleton distractors is modulated by top-down dimensional set, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1 Nothdurft, 1993, Saliency effects across dimensions in visual search, Vision Research, 33, 839, 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90202-8 Pelli, 1997, The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies, Spatial Vision, 10, 437, 10.1163/156856897X00366 Ratcliff, 2008, The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks, Neural Computation, 20, 873, 10.1162/neco.2008.12-06-420 Sauter, 2020 Sauter, 2019, Learning to suppress salient distractors in the target dimension: Region-based inhibition is persistent and transfers to distractors in a nontarget dimension, Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45, 2080, 10.1037/xlm0000691 Sauter, 2018, Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors, Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 80, 622, 10.3758/s13414-017-1477-4 Schreij, 2010, Abrupt onsets capture attention independent of top-down control settings II: Additivity is no evidence for filtering, Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 672, 10.3758/APP.72.3.672 Theeuwes, 1991, Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity, Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 184, 10.3758/BF03212219 Theeuwes, 2004, Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 65, 10.3758/BF03206462 Theeuwes, 2010, Top–down and bottom–up control of visual selection, Acta Psychologica, 135, 77, 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.02.006 Theeuwes, 2003, Attentional and oculomotor capture with static singletons, Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 735, 10.3758/BF03194810 Töllner, 2011, Stimulus saliency modulates pre-attentive processing speed in human visual cortex, Plos One, 6, 10.1371/journal.pone.0016276 van Zoest, 2005, The effects of salience on saccadic target selection, Visual Cognition, 12, 353, 10.1080/13506280444000229 Võ, 2019, Reading scenes: How scene grammar guides attention and aids perception in real-world environments, Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 205, 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.03.009 Walthew, 2006, Target location probability effects in visual search: An effect of sequential dependencies, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1294 Wang, 2019, Statistical regularities bias overt attention, Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 81, 1813, 10.3758/s13414-019-01708-5 Wang, 2018, How to inhibit a distractor location? Statistical learning versus active, top-down suppression, Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 80, 860, 10.3758/s13414-018-1493-z Wang, 2018, Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44, 13 Wykowska, 2011, Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 645, 10.1162/jocn.2009.21390 Zehetleitner, 2013, Salience-based selection: Attentional capture by distractors less salient than the target, Plos One, 8, 10.1371/journal.pone.0052595 Zhang, 2019, Probability cueing of singleton-distractor locations in visual search: Priority-map- versus dimension-based inhibition?, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 45, 1146 Zhaoping, 2012, Gaze capture by eye-of-origin singletons: Interdependence with awareness, Journal of Vision, 12, 17, 10.1167/12.2.17