Compressed vertical partitioning for efficient RDF management
Tóm tắt
The Web of Data has been gaining momentum in recent years. This leads to increasingly publish more and more semi-structured datasets following, in many cases, the RDF (Resource Description Framework) data model based on atomic triple units of subject, predicate, and object. Although it is a very simple model, specific compression methods become necessary because datasets are increasingly larger and various scalability issues arise around their organization and storage. This requirement is even more restrictive in RDF stores because efficient SPARQL solution on the compressed RDF datasets is also required. This article introduces a novel RDF indexing technique that supports efficient SPARQL solution in compressed space. Our technique, called
$$\hbox {k}^2$$
-triples, uses the predicate to vertically partition the dataset into disjoint subsets of pairs (subject, object), one per predicate. These subsets are represented as binary matrices of subjects
$$\times $$
objects in which 1-bits mean that the corresponding triple exists in the dataset. This model results in very sparse matrices, which are efficiently compressed using
$$\hbox {k}^2$$
-trees. We enhance this model with two compact indexes listing the predicates related to each different subject and object in the dataset, in order to address the specific weaknesses of vertically partitioned representations. The resulting technique not only achieves by far the most compressed representations, but also achieves the best overall performance for RDF retrieval in our experimental setup. Our approach uses up to 10 times less space than a state-of-the-art baseline and outperforms its time performance by several orders of magnitude on the most basic query patterns. In addition, we optimize traditional join algorithms on
$$\hbox {k}^2$$
-triples and define a novel one leveraging its specific features. Our experimental results show that our technique also overcomes traditional vertical partitioning for join solution, reporting the best numbers for joins in which the non-joined nodes are provided, and being competitive in most of the cases.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abadi D, Marcus A, Madden S, Hollenbach K (2009) SW-store: a vertically partitioned DBMS for semantic web data management. VLDB J 18:385–406
Abadi D, Madden S, Ferreira M (2006) Integrating compression and execution in column-oriented database systems. In: Proceedings of 33rd international conference on management of data (SIGMOD)’, pp 671–682
Abadi D, Marcus A, Madden S, Hollenbach K (2007) Scalable semantic web data management using vertical partitioning. In: Proceedings of 33rd international conference on very large data bases (VLDB)’, pp 411–422
Anglés R, Gutiérrez C (2005) Querying RDF data from a graph database perspective. In: Proceedings of 2nd European semantic web conference (ESWC)’, pp 346–360
Arias M, Fernández J, Martínez-Prieto M (2011) An empirical study of real-world SPARQL queries. In: Proceedings of 1st international workshop on usage analysis and the web of data (USEWOD). Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1103.5043
Atre M, Chaoji V, Zaki M, Hendler J (2010) Matrix “bit” loaded: a scalable lightweight join query processor for RDF data. In: Proceedings of 19th international conference on world wide web (WWW)’, pp 41–50
Auer S, Bizer C, Kobilarov G, Lehmann J, Cyganiak R, Ives Z (2007) DBpedia: a nucleus for a web of open data. In: Proceedings of 6th international semantic web (ISWC) conference and 2nd Asian semantic web conference (ASWC)’, pp 722–735
Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O (2001) The semantic web. Scientific American Magazine
Binna R, Gassler W, Zangerle E, Pacher D, Specht, G (2011) SpiderStore: a native main memory approach for graph storage. In: Proceedings of 23rd workshop Grundlagen von Datenbanken (GvDB)’, pp 91–96
Bizer C, Heath T, Berners-Lee T (2009) Linked data-the story so far. Int J Semant Web Inf Syst 5:1–22
Bönström V, Hinze A, Schweppe H (2003) Storing RDF as a graph. In: Proceedings of 1st Latin American Web Congress (LA-WEB)’, pp 27–36
Brisaboa N, Ladra S, Navarro G (2013) DACs: Bringing direct access to variable-length codes. Inf Process Manag 49(1):392–404
Brisaboa N, Ladra S, Navarro G (2014) Compact representation of web graphs with extended functionality. Inf Syst 39(1):152–174
Brisaboa N, de Bernardo G, Navarro G (2012) Compressed dynamic binary relations. In: Proceedings of 22nd data compression conference (DCC)’, pp 52–61
Broekstra J, Kampman A, van Harmelen F (2003) Sesame: an architecture for storing and querying RDF data and schema information. In: Spinning the semantic web, chapter , MIT Press, pp 197–222
Claude F, Ladra S (2011) Practical representations for Web and social graphs. In: Proceedings of 20th ACM conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM)’, pp 1185–1190
Fernández JD, Martínez-Prieto MA, Gutiérrez C, Polleres A (2011) Binary RDF representation for publication and exchange (HDT), W3C Member Submission. http://www.w3.org/Submission/2011/03/
Fernández JD, Martínez-Prieto MA, Gutiérrez C, Polleres A, Arias M (2013) Binary RDF representation for publication and exchange (HDT). J Web Semant. (in press). Available at: doi:10.1016/j.websem.2013.01.002
González R, Grabowski S, Mäkinen V, Navarro G (2005) Practical implementation of rank and select queries. In: Proceedings of posters of 4th workshop on experimental algorithms (WEA), pp 27–38
Grant J, Beckett D (2004) RDF test cases, W3C recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/
Groppe S (2011) Data management and query processing in semantic web databases. Springer, Berlin
Groza T, Grimnes G, Handschuh S, Decker S (2013) From raw publications to linked data. Knowl Inf Syst 34:1–21
Harris S, Gibbins N (2003) 3store: efficient bulk RDF storage. In: Proceedings of 1st international workshop on practical and scalable semantic systems (PSSS), pp 1–15
Harth A, Decker S (2005) Optimized index structures for querying RDF from the web. In: Proceedings of 3rd Latin American Web Congress (LA-WEB)’, pp 71–80
Hayes J, Gutiérrez C (2004) Bipartite graphs as intermediate model for RDF. In: Proceedings of 3rd international semantic web conference (ISWC), pp 47–61
Huang J, Abadi D, Ren K (2011) Scalable SPARQL querying of large RDF graphs. Proc VLDB Endow 4(11):1123–1134
Janik M, Kochut K (2005) BRAHMS: a workbench RDF store and high performance memory system for semantic association discovery. In: Proceedings of 4th international semantic web conference (ISWC), pp 431–445
Jing Y, Jeong D, Baik D (2009) Sparql graph pattern rewriting for owl-dl inference queries. Knowl Inf Syst 20:243–262
Knuth D (1973) The art of computer programming, vol. 3: sorting and searching. Addison Wesley, Reading
Manola F, Miller E (eds) (2004) RDF primer, W3C recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer/
Martínez-Prieto M, Fernández J, Cánovas R (2012) Querying RDF dictionaries in compressed space. ACM SIGAPP Appl Comput Rev 12(2):64–77
MonetDB (2013). http://www.monetdb.org/
Navarro G, Mäkinen V (2007) Compressed full-text indexes. In: ACM computing surveys 39(1) article 2
Neumann T, Weikum G (2010) The RDF-3X engine for scalable management of RDF data. VLDB J 19:91–113
Neumann T, Weikum G (2009) Scalable join processing on very large RDF graphs. In: Proceedings of 35th international conference on management of data (SIGMOD), pp 627–640
Prud’hommeaux E, Seaborne A (eds) (2008) SPARQL query language for RDF, W3C recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/
Ramakrishnan R, Gehrke J (2000) Database management systems. Osborne/McGraw-Hill
Sakr S, Al-Naymat G (2010) Relational processing of RDF queries: a survey. SIGMOD Rec 38:23–28
Sakr S, Elnikety S, He Y (2012) G-SPARQL: a hybrid engine for querying large attributed graphs. In: Proceedings of 21st ACM conference on information and knowledge management (CIKM), pp 335–344
Salomon D (2007) Variable-length codes for data compression. Springer, Berlin
Samet H (2006) Foundations of multidimensional and metric data structures. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, Los Altos
Sánchez D, Isern D, Millan M (2011) Content annotation for the semantic web: an automatic web-based approach. Knowl Inf Syst 27:393–418
Schmidt M, Hornung T, Küchlin N, Lausen G, Pinkel C (2008) An experimental comparison of RDF data management approaches in a SPARQL benchmark scenario. In: Proceedings of 7th international conference on the semantic web (ISWC), pp 82–97
Sidirourgos L, Goncalves R, Kersten M, Nes N, Manegold S (2008) Column-store support for RDF data management: not all swans are white. Proc VLDB Endow 1(2):1553–1563
Stonebraker M, Abadi D, Batkin A, Chen X, Cherniack M, Ferreira M, Lau E, Lin A, Madden S, O’Neil E, O’Neil P, Rasin A, Tran N, Zdonik S (2005) C-store: a column-oriented DBMS. In: Proceedings of 31st international conference on very large data bases (VLDB), pp 553–564
Urbani J, Maassen J, Bal H (2010) Massive semantic web data compression with MapReduce. In: Proceedings of 19th ACM international symposium on high performance distributed computing (HPDC), pp 795–802
Virtuoso Universal Server (2013) http://virtuoso.openlinksw.com/
Weiss C, Karras P, Bernstein A (2008) Hexastore: sextuple indexing for semantic web data management. Proc VLDB Endow 1(1):1008–1019
Wilkinson K (2006) Jena property table implementation. In: Proceedings of 2nd international workshop on scalable semantic web knowledge base systems (SSWS), pp 35–46