Consensus scoring for protein–ligand interactions

Jorgensen, 2004, The many roles of computation in drug discovery, Science, 303, 1813, 10.1126/science.1096361 Krovat, 2005, Recent advances in docking and scoring, Curr. Comp. Aided Drug Des., 1, 93, 10.2174/1573409052952314 Mohan, 2005, Docking: successes and challenges, Curr. Pharm. Des., 11, 323, 10.2174/1381612053382106 Schulz-Gasch, 2004, Scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions: a critical perspective, Drug Discov. Today: Technol., 1, 231, 10.1016/j.ddtec.2004.08.004 Kitchen, 2004, Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 3, 935, 10.1038/nrd1549 Lyne, 2002, Structure-based virtual screening: an overview, Drug Discov. Today, 7, 1047, 10.1016/S1359-6446(02)02483-2 Kitchen, 2004, Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 3, 935, 10.1038/nrd1549 Ajay, 1994, On better generalization by combining two or more models: a quantitative structure-activity relationship example using neural networks, Chemometr. Intell. Lab., 24, 19, 10.1016/0169-7439(94)00027-1 So, 1996, Evolutionary optimization in quantitative structure-activity relationship: an application of genetic neural networks, J. Med. Chem., 39, 1521, 10.1021/jm9507035 Rogers, 1994, Application of genetic function approximation to quantitative structure-activity relationships and quantitative structure-property relationships, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 34, 854, 10.1021/ci00020a020 Ginn, 1996, Similarity searching in files of three-dimensional chemical structures: evaluation of the EVA descriptor and combination of rankings using data fusion, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 37, 23, 10.1021/ci960466u Charifson, 1999, Consensus Scoring: A Method for Obtaining Improved Hit Rates from Docking Databases of Three-Dimensional Structures into Proteins, J. Med. Chem., 42, 5100, 10.1021/jm990352k Stahl, 2001, Detailed analysis of scoring functions for virtual screening, J. Med. Chem., 44, 1035, 10.1021/jm0003992 Clark, 2002, Consensus scoring for ligand/protein interactions, J. Mol. Graph. Model., 20, 281, 10.1016/S1093-3263(01)00125-5 Paul, 2002, ConsDock: A New Program for the Consensus Analysis of Protein-Ligand Interactions, Proteins, 47, 521, 10.1002/prot.10119 Verdonk, 2004, Virtual screening using protein-ligand docking: Avoiding artificial enrichment, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 44, 793, 10.1021/ci034289q Bissantz, 2000, Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations, J. Med. Chem., 43, 4759, 10.1021/jm001044l Krovat, 2004, Impact Of scoring functions on enrichment in docking-based virtual screening: an application study on renin inhibitors, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 44, 1123, 10.1021/ci0342728 Mpamhanga, 2005, Retrospective docking study of PDE4B ligands and an analysis of the behavior of selected scoring functions, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 45, 1061, 10.1021/ci050044x Bissantz, 2003, Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. II. Are homology models of G-potein coupled receptors suitable targets?, Proteins, 50, 5, 10.1002/prot.10237 Liu, 2005, Virtual screening of novel noncovalent inhibitors for SARS-CoV 3C-like proteinase, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 45, 10, 10.1021/ci049809b Ashton, 2004, The selection and design of GPCR ligands: from concept to the clinic, Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen, 7, 441, 10.2174/1386207043328607 Lyne, 2004, Identification of compounds with nanomolar binding affinity for checkpoint kinase-1 using knowledge-based virtual screening, J. Med. Chem., 47, 1962, 10.1021/jm030504i Wang, 2003, Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking, J. Med. Chem., 46, 2287, 10.1021/jm0203783 Cavasotto, 2004, Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases, J. Mol. Biol., 337, 209, 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.01.003 Barril, 2005, Unveiling the full potential of flexible receptor docking using multiple crystallographic structures, J. Med. Chem., 48, 4432, 10.1021/jm048972v Merlitz, 2004, Impact of receptor conformation on in silico screening performance, Chem. Phys. Lett., 390, 500, 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.04.074 Gohlke, 2002, Approaches to the description and prediction of binding affinity of small molecule ligands to macromolecular receptors, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl., 41, 2644, 10.1002/1521-3773(20020802)41:15<2644::AID-ANIE2644>3.0.CO;2-O Marsden, 2004, Predicting protein-ligand binding affinities: a low scoring game?, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2, 3267, 10.1039/B409570G Wang, 2002, Further development and validation of empirical scoring functions for structure-based binding affinity prediction, J. Comp. Aided Mol. Des., 16, 11, 10.1023/A:1016357811882 Terp, 2001, A new concept for multidimensional selection of ligand conformations (MultiSelect) and multidimensional scoring (MultiScore) of protein-ligand binding affinities, J. Med. Chem., 44, 2333, 10.1021/jm001090l Jacobsson, 2003, Improving Structure-Based Virtual Screening by Multivariate Analysis of Scoring Data, J. Med. Chem., 46, 5781, 10.1021/jm030896t Prathipati, 2006, Evaluation of binary QSAR models derived from LUDI and MOE scoring functions for structure based virtual screening, J. Chem. Inf. Mod., 46, 39, 10.1021/ci050120w Klon, 2004, Combination of a naïve Bayes classifier with consensus scoring improves enrichment of high-throughput docking results, J. Med. Chem., 47, 4356, 10.1021/jm049970d Mestres, 2000, Similarity versus docking in 3D virtual screening, Persp. Drug Disc. Des., 20, 191, 10.1023/A:1008789224614 Fradera, 2000, Similarity-driven flexible ligand docking, Proteins, 40, 623, 10.1002/1097-0134(20000901)40:4<623::AID-PROT70>3.0.CO;2-I So, 1999, A comparative study of ligand-receptor complex binding affinity prediction methods based on glycogen phosphorylase inhibitors, J. Comp. Aided Mol. Des., 13, 243, 10.1023/A:1008073215919 Wang, 2001, How Does Consensus Scoring Work for Virtual Library Screening? An Idealized Computer Experiment, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 41, 1422, 10.1021/ci010025x Baber, 2006, The use of consensus scoring in ligand-based virtual screening, J. Chem. Inf. Model, 46, 277, 10.1021/ci050296y Cummings, 2005, Comparison of automated docking programs as virtual screening tools, J. Med. Chem., 48, 962, 10.1021/jm049798d Xing, 2004, Evaluation and application of multiple scoring functions for a virtual screening experiment, J. Comp. Aided Mol. Des., 18, 333, 10.1023/B:JCAM.0000047812.39758.ab Yang, 2005, Consensus scoring criteria for improving enrichment in virtual screening, J. Chem. Inf. Model, 45, 1134, 10.1021/ci050034w Livingstone, 1995