Statistical significance testing, construct validity, and clinical versus actuarial judgment: an interesting (seeming) paradox

Cronbach, 1955, Construct validity in psychological tests, Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281, 10.1037/h0040957 Faust, D. (1984). The limits of scientific reasoning. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Faust, 2003, Holistic thinking is not the whole story, Assessment, 10, 428, 10.1177/1073191103259534 Faust, 2002, Using meta-scientific studies to clarify or resolve questions in the philosophy and history of science, Philosophy of Science, 69, S185, 10.1086/341845 Grove, 1996, Comparative efficiency of informal (subjective, impressionistic) and formal (mechanical, algorithmic) prediction procedures: The clinical-statistical controversy, Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 2, 293, 10.1037/1076-8971.2.2.293 Grove, 2000, Clinical vs. mechanical prediction: A meta-analysis, Psychological Assessment, 12, 19, 10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.19 Lichtenstein, S., Fischhoff, B., & Phillips, L. D. (1982). Calibration of probabilities: The state of the art to 1980. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 306–334). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Meehl, 1978, Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 806, 10.1037/0022-006X.46.4.806 Meehl, P. E. (1991). Selected philosophical and methodological papers (C. A. Anderson & K. Gunderson Eds.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. Meehl, 1992, Cliometric metatheory: The actuarial approach to empirical, history-based philosophy of science, Psychological Reports, 71, 339 Meehl, P. E. (1996). Clinical versus statistical prediction: A theoretical analysis and a review of the evidence. (Reprint of Meehl, 1954, with new Preface). Northvale, NJ: Jason Aronson. Meehl, P. E. (1997). The problem is epistemology, not statistics: Replace significance tests by confidence intervals and quantify accuracy of risky numerical predictions. In L. L. Harlow, S. A. Mulaik, & J. H. Steiger (Eds.), What if there were no significance tests? (pp. 393–425). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Meehl, P. E. (1998, May 23rd). The power of quantitative thinking. Speech delivered upon receipt of the James McKeen Cattell Fellow award at the Meeting of the American Psychological Society. Washington, DC.