A comparison of the performance of threshold criteria for binary classification in terms of predicted prevalence and kappa

Ecological Modelling - Tập 217 - Trang 48-58 - 2008
Elizabeth A. Freeman1, Gretchen G. Moisen1
1USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 507 25th Street, Ogden, UT 84401, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Allouche, 2006, Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa, and the true skill statistic (TSS), Journal of Applied Ecology, 43, 1223, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x Biggerstaff, 2000, Comparing diagnostic tests: a simple graphic using likelihood ratios, Statistics in Medicine, 19, 649, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(20000315)19:5<649::AID-SIM371>3.0.CO;2-H Cantor, 1999, A comparison of C/B ratios from studies using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 52, 885, 10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00075-X Congalton, 1991, A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 37, 35, 10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B Cramer, 2003 Fielding, 1997, A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models, Environmental Conservation, 24, 38, 10.1017/S0376892997000088 Freeman, E., 2007. PresenceAbsence: An R Package for Presence–Absence Model Evaluation. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 507 25th street, Ogden, UT, USA. http://cran.r-project.org/. Freeman, 2008, PresenceAbsence: an R package for presence–absence analysis, Journal of Statistical Software, 23, 11, 10.18637/jss.v023.i11 Greiner, 2000, Principles and practical application of the receiver-operation characteristic analysis for diagnostic tests, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 45, 23, 10.1016/S0167-5877(00)00115-X Guisan, 2003, Predicting reptile distributions at the mesoscale: relation to climate and topography, Journal of Biogeography, 30, 1233, 10.1046/j.1365-2699.2003.00914.x Hernandez, 2006, The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods, Ecography, 29, 773, 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2006.04700.x Hirzel, 2006, Evaluating the ability of habitat suitability models to predict species presences, Ecological Modelling, 199, 142, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.017 Manel, 2001, Evaluating presence–absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence, Journal of Applied Ecology, 38, 921, 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00647.x McPherson, 2004, The effects of species range sizes on the accuracy of distribution models: ecological phenomenon or statistical artifact, Journal of Applied Ecology, 41, 811, 10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00943.x Moisen, 2006, Predicting tree species presence and basal area in Utah: a comparison of stochastic gradient boosting, generalized additive models, and tree-based methods, Ecological Modelling, 199, 176, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.05.021 Pearce, 2000, Evaluating the predicting performance of habitat models developed using logistic regression, Ecological Modelling, 133, 225, 10.1016/S0304-3800(00)00322-7 R Development Core Team, 2006. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN: 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org/. Vaughan, 2005, The continuing challenges of testing species distribution models, Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 720, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01052.x Wilson, 2005, Sensitivity of conservation planning to different approaches to using predicted species distribution data, Biological Conservation, 22, 99, 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.07.004