Governing coalitions and key performance indicators of port governance

Maritime Transport Research - Tập 2 - Trang 100023 - 2021
Henrique Campos de Oliveira1, Jongeun You2, André Pires Coelho3
1Universidade Salvador, Brazil
2University of Colorado, Denver, United States
3Universidade Federal da Bahia, Brazil

Tài liệu tham khảo

Alderton, 2018 Baird, 1995, Privatisation of trust ports in the United Kingdom: review and analysis of the first sales, Transp. Policy, 2, 135, 10.1016/0967-070X(95)91993-T Baird, 1999, Analysis of private seaport development in the port of Felixstowe, Transp. Policy, 6, 109, 10.1016/S0967-070X(99)00012-8 Baird, 2000, Port privatization: objectives, extent, process, and the U.K. experience, Int. J. Marit. Econ., 2, 177, 10.1057/ijme.2000.16 Baltazar, 2006, Chapter 17 port governance, devolution and the matching framework: a configuration theory approach, Res. Transp. Econ., 17, 379, 10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17017-1 Bergqvist, 2017, Port privatization in Sweden: domestic realism in the face of global hype, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 22, 224, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.10.007 Brooks, 2017, A new direction or stay the course? Canada's port-specific challenges resulting from the port reform program of the 1990s, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 22, 161, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.08.002 Brooks, 2006, Chapter 18 governance models defined, Res. Transp. Econ., 17, 405, 10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17018-3 Brooks, 2008, Assessing port governance models: process and performance components, Marit. Policy Manag., 35, 411, 10.1080/03088830802215060 Brooks, 2017, Revisiting port governance and port reform: a multi-country examination, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 22, 1, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2017.02.005 Chen, 2017, The latest trend in Australian port privatisation: drivers, processes and impacts, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 22, 201, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.10.005 Chen, 2014, The dynamics of port reform: different contexts, similar strategies, Marit. Policy Manag., 41, 288, 10.1080/03088839.2013.839513 Debrie, 2017, From national reforms to local compromises: the evolution of France's model for port management, 2004-2015, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 22, 114, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.12.006 Debrie, 2013, Shaping port governance: the territorial trajectories of reform, J. Transport Geogr., 27, 56, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.07.007 Costa, 2004, Proceso de privatización, organización y competencia interportuaria en argentina: El caso del Puerto Quequén, Inves. Geogr., 54, 93 de Langen, 2006, Chapter 20 stakeholders, conflicting interests and governance in port clusters, Res. Transp. Econ., 17, 457, 10.1016/S0739-8859(06)17020-1 de Langen, 2017, Institutional reforms of port authorities in the Netherlands; the establishment of port development companies, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 22, 108, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.12.007 Doctor, 2017 Esmer, 2017, Port governance in Turkey: the age of the global terminal operators, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 22, 214, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.12.001 Estache, 2002, Efficiency gains from port reform and the potential for yardstick competition: lessons from Mexico, World Dev., 30, 545, 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00129-2 Galvão, 2017, 20 years of port reform in Brazil: insights into the reform process, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 22, 153, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2017.01.002 Goss, 1990, Economic policies and seaports: the economic function of seaports, Marit. Policy Manag., 17, 207, 10.1080/03088839000000028 Goss, 1990, Economic policies and seaports: the diversity of port policies, Marit. Policy Manag., 17, 221, 10.1080/03088839000000029 Goss, 1990, Economic policies and seaports: are port authorities necessary?, Marit. Policy Manag., 17, 257, 10.1080/03088839000000032 Havenga, 2017, International trade logistics costs in South Africa: informing the port reform agenda, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 22, 263, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.08.006 Heikkila, 2017, Comparison of theories of the policy process, 301 Jenkins-Smith, 2017, The advocacy coalition framework: an overview of the research program, 135 Knatz, 2017, How competition is driving change in port governance, strategic decision-making and government policy in the United States, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 22, 67, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.08.003 Lane, 2000 Lee, 2017, A review of port devolution and governance models with compound eyes approach, Transport Rev, 37, 507, 10.1080/01441647.2016.1254690 McGrandle, 2017, Understanding diversity management in the public sector: a case for contingency theory, Int. J. Public Adm., 40, 526 McLaughlin, 2002 Monié, 2006, Cidades, portos e cidades portuárias na era da integração produtiva, Rev. Adm. Públ., 40, 975, 10.1590/S0034-76122006000600003 Monios, 2017, Port governance in the UK: planning without policy, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 22, 78, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.10.006 Monios, 2016, Between path dependency and contingency: new challenges for the geography of port system evolution, J. Transp. Geogr., 51, 247, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.01.008 Moore, 1985 Ng, 2010, Port governance reforms in diversified institutional frameworks: generic solutions, implementation asymmetries, Environ. Plan. A, 42, 2147, 10.1068/a42514 Notteboom, 2013, Institutional plasticity and path dependence in seaports: interactions between institutions, port governance reforms and port authority routines, J. Transp. Geogr., 27, 26, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.05.002 Notteboom, 2012, The corporate geography of global container terminal operators, Marit. Policy Manag., 39, 249, 10.1080/03088839.2012.671970 Notteboom, 2017, Port governance in China since 2004: institutional layering and the growing impact of broader policies, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 22, 184, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.09.002 Nwanosike, 2016, Productivity change in Nigerian seaports after reform: a Malmquist productivity index decomposition approach, Marit. Policy Manag., 43, 798, 10.1080/03088839.2016.1183827 Park, 2020, Optimal emission control under public port rivalry: a comparison of competitive and cooperative policy, Marit. Transp. Res., 1 Parola, 2017, Dealing with multi-scalar embeddedness and institutional divergence: evidence from the renovation of Italian port governance, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 22, 89, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.12.005 Pierce, 2020, Policy change: an Advocacy Coalition Framework perspective, Policy Stud. J., 48, 64, 10.1111/psj.12223 Sabatier, 1988, An Advocacy Coalition Framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein, Policy Sci, 21, 129, 10.1007/BF00136406 Shinohara, 2017, Characteristics of Japanese port policy: strategic ports and policy dilemma, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 22, 100, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.08.005 Simonet, 2011, The New Public Management Theory and the reform of European health care systems: an international comparative perspective, Int. J. Public Adm., 34, 815, 10.1080/01900692.2011.603401 Song, 2017, Port governance in Korea: revisited, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 22, 27, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.11.002 Starr, 1995, Ports as gateways: a traditional concept revisited, 1995, 89 Talley, 2012 Talley, 2013, Maritime transport chain choice by carriers, ports and shippers, Int. J. Prod. Econ., 142, 311, 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.11.013 Talley, 2016, Port economic cost functions: a service perspective, Transp. Res. E-Log., 88, 1, 10.1016/j.tre.2015.12.002 Talley, 2016, Port multi-service congestion, Transp. Res. E-Log., 94, 66, 10.1016/j.tre.2016.07.005 2019 Van de Voorde, 2017, Port governance and policy changes in Belgium 2006-2016: a comprehensive assessment of process and impact, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 22, 123, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.12.004 Verhetsel, 2009, World maritime cities: from which cities do container shipping companies make decisions?, Transp. Policy, 16, 240, 10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.08.002 Vieira, 2014, Governance, governance models and port performance: a systematic review, Transp. Rev., 34, 645, 10.1080/01441647.2014.946458 Villa, 2017, Port reform in Mexico: 1993-2015, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 22, 232, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.11.003 Wang, 2011, Spatial pattern of the global shipping network and its hub-and-spoke system, Res. Transp. Econ., 32, 54, 10.1016/j.retrec.2011.06.010 Weible, 2020, Sharpening advocacy coalitions, Policy Stud. J., 48, 1054, 10.1111/psj.12360 Wilmsmeier, 2016, Institutional structure and agency in the governance of spatial diversification of port system evolution in Latin America, J. Transp. Geogr., 51, 294, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.02.004 Wilmsmeier, 2017, Evolution of national port governance and interport competition in Chile, Res. Transp. Bus. Manag., 22, 171, 10.1016/j.rtbm.2017.01.001 2007 2018