The effect of audit seniors’ decisions on working paper documentation and on partners’ decisions

Accounting, Organizations and Society - Tập 24 - Trang 155-171 - 1999
David N Ricchiute1
1College of Business Administration, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556-0399, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abdolmohammadi, M. J., & Wright, A. (1987). An examination of the effects of experience and task complexity on audit judgments. The Accounting Review, 1–13. Anon (1988). Statement on auditing standards No. 59: the auditor’s consideration of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Asare, S. K., & McDaniel, L. S. (1996). The effects of familiarity with the preparer and task complexity on the effectiveness of the audit review process. The Accounting Review, 139–159. Choo F., & Trotman, K. T. (1991). The relationship between knowledge structure and judgments for experienced and inexperienced auditors. The Accounting Review, 464–485. Cushing, B.E., & Loebbecke, J. K. (1986). Comparison of Audit Methodologies of Large Accounting Firms. AAA. Dellarosa, D., & Bourne Jr, L. E. (1984). Decisions and memory: differential retrievability of consistent and contradictory evidence. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 669–682. Earley, P.C., Wojnaroski, P., & Prest, W. (1987). Task planning and energy expended: exploration of how goals influence performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107–114. Gardiner, J.M., & Tulving, E. (1980). Exceptions to recognition failure of recallable words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 194–209. Haist, F., Shimamura, A. P., & Squire, L. R. (1992). On the relationship between recall and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 691–702. Kennedy, J. (1993). Debiasing audit judgment with accountability: a framework and experimental results. Journal of Accounting Research, 231–245. Koonce, L., Anderson, U., & Marchant, G. (1995). Justification of decisions in auditing. Journal of Accounting Research, 369–384. Libby, R., & Trotman, K. T. (1993). The review process as a control for differential recall of evidence in auditor judgment. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 559–574. Moeckel, C.L., & Plumlee, R. D. (1989). Auditors’ confidence in recognition of audit evidence. The Accounting Review, 653–666. Pennington, N., & Hastie, R.. (1988). Explanation-based decision making: effects of memory structure on judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 521–533. Ramsey, R. J. (1994). Senior/manager differences in audit workpaper performance. Journal of Accounting Research, 127–135. Ricchiute, D. N. (1992). Working paper order effects and auditors’ going-concern decisions. The Accounting Review, 46–58. Rich, J.S., Solomon, I., & Trotman, K. T. (1997). The audit review process: a characterization from the persuasion perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 481–505. Singh, S.N., Rothschild, M. L., & Churchill Jr, G. A. (1988). Recognition versus recall as measures of television commercial forgetting. Journal of Marketing Research, 72–80. Swieringa, R.J., & Weick, K. E. (1982). An assessment of laboratory experiments in accounting. Journal of Accounting Research, Supplement, 56–101. Tan, H. (1995). Effects of expectations, prior involvement, and review awareness on memory for audit evidence and judgment. Journal of Accounting Research, 113–135. Trotman, K.T., & Yetton, P. W. (1985). The effect of the review process on auditor judgments. Journal of Accounting Research, 256–267.