Creative destruction or mere niche support? Innovation policy mixes for sustainability transitions

Research Policy - Tập 45 - Trang 205-217 - 2016
Paula Kivimaa1,2, Florian Kern1
1SPRU-Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9SL, UK
2Finnish Environment Institute, P.O. Box 140, FI-00251 Helsinki, Finland

Tài liệu tham khảo

Abernathy, 1985, Innovation: mapping the winds of creative destruction, Res. Policy, 14, 3, 10.1016/0048-7333(85)90021-6 Alkemade, 2011, Transition policy and innovation policy: friends or foes?, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 1, 125, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.009 Anderson, 1990, Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: a cyclical model of technological change, Adm. Sci. Q., 35, 604, 10.2307/2393511 Bergek, 2013, Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: destruction, disruption or creative accumulation?, Res. Policy, 42, 1210, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.009 Bergek, 2008, Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis, Res. Policy, 37, 407, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003 Borrás, 2013, The choice of innovation policy instruments, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 80, 1513, 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.03.002 Bower, 1995, Disruptive technologies: catching the wave, Harv. Bus. Rev., 73, 43 Breukers, 2013, Changing energy demand behaviour: potential of demand-side management, 773 Christensen, 1997 Christopoulos, 2015, Exceptional or just well connected? Political entrepreneurs and brokers in policy making, Eur. Polit. Sci. Rev., 7, 475, 10.1017/S1755773914000277 Energy Efficiency Watch, 2013 Flanagan, 2011, Reconceptualising the policy mix for innovation, Res. Policy, 40, 702, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005 Foxon, 2005, UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures, Energy Policy, 33, 2123, 10.1016/j.enpol.2004.04.011 Geels, 2002, Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study, Res. Policy, 31, 1257, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8 Geels, 2004, From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory, Res. Policy, 33, 897, 10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015 Geels, 2010, Ontologies, socio-technical transitions (to sustainability), and the multi-level perspective, Res. Policy, 39, 495, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.022 Geels, 2011, The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: responses to eight criticisms, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 1, 24, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002 Geels, 2007, Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways, Res. Policy, 36, 399, 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003 Heiskanen, 2013, Learning about and involving users in energy saving on the local level, J. Clean. Prod., 48, 241, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.019 Heiskanen, 2009, Designed to travel? Transition management encounters environmental and innovation policy histories in Finland, Policy Sc., 42, 409, 10.1007/s11077-009-9094-2 Hodson, 2010, Can cities shape socio-technical transitions and how would we know if they were?, Res. Policy, 39, 477, 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.020 Hodson, 2012, Mediating low-carbon urban transitions? Forms of organization, knowledge and action, Eur. Plan. Stud., 20, 421, 10.1080/09654313.2012.651804 Hoogma, 2002 Howlett, 2007, Design principles for policy mixes: cohesion and coherence in ‘new governance arrangements’, Policy Soc., 26, 1 Howlett, 2013, Patching vs packaging in policy formulation: assessing policy portfolio design, Polit. Gov., 1, 170, 10.17645/pag.v1i2.95 Huttunen, 2014, The need for policy coherence to trigger a transition to biogas production, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 12, 14, 10.1016/j.eist.2014.04.002 IEA, 2012 IEA, 2013 Jacobsson, 2011, Innovation system analyses and sustainability transitions: contributions and suggestions for research, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 1, 41, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.04.006 Jänicke, 2005, Ecological modernisation and the creation of lead markets, 175 Kemp, 2004, Managing the transition to sustainable mobility, 137 Kemp, 1998, Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of Strategic Niche Management, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage., 10, 175, 10.1080/09537329808524310 Kern, 2015, Engaging with the politics, agency and structures in the technological innovation systems approach, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 16, 67, 10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.001 Kern, 2014, From laggard to leader: explaining offshore wind developments in the UK, Energy Policy, 69, 635, 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.031 Kern, 2012, Using the multi-level perspective on socio-technical transitions to assess innovation policy, Technol. Forecast. Soc., 79, 298, 10.1016/j.techfore.2011.07.004 Kern, 2011, Ideas, institutions, and interests: explaining policy divergence in fostering ‘system innovations’ towards sustainability, Environ. Plan. C Gov. Policy, 29, 1116, 10.1068/c1142 Kern, 2009, Implementing transition management as policy reforms: a case study of the Dutch energy sector, Policy Sci., 42, 391, 10.1007/s11077-009-9099-x Kern, 2008, Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands, Energy Policy, 36, 4093, 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.018 Kivimaa, 2014, Government-affiliated intermediary organisations as actors in system-level transitions, Res. Policy, 43, 1370, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.007 Kivimaa, 2014, Policy mixes, policy interplay and low carbon transitions: the case of passenger transport in Finland, EPG, 24, 28 Klaassen, 2005, The impact of R&D on innovation for wind energy in Denmark, Germany and the United Kingdom, Ecol. Econ., 54, 227, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.008 Lockwood, 2013, The political sustainability of climate policy: the case of the UK Climate Change Act, Global Environ. Chang., 23, 1339, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.001 Magro, 2013, Complex innovation policy systems: towards an evaluation mix, Res. Policy, 42, 1647, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.06.005 Markard, 2008, Technological innovation systems and the multi-level perspective: towards an integrated framework, Res. Policy, 37, 596, 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.004 Markard, 2012, Sustainability transitions: an emerging field of research and its prospects, Res. Policy, 41, 955, 10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 Meadowcroft, 2005, Environmental political economy, technological transitions and the state, N. Polit. Econ., 10, 479, 10.1080/13563460500344419 Meadowcroft, 2009, What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions, Policy Sci., 42, 323, 10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z Meadowcroft, 2011, Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions, Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit., 1, 70, 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003 Meelen, 2013, Towards an integrated framework for analysing sustainable innovation policy, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage., 25, 957, 10.1080/09537325.2013.823146 Nauwelaers, 2009 Newell, 2010, The role of markets and policies in delivering innovation for climate change mitigation, Oxford Rev. Econ. Policy, 26, 253, 10.1093/oxrep/grq009 Nilsson, 2012, Understanding policy coherence: analytical framework and examples of sector–environment policy interactions in the EU, EPG, 22, 395 Pavitt, 1984, Sectoral patterns of technical change: towards a taxonomy and a theory, Res. Policy, 13, 343, 10.1016/0048-7333(84)90018-0 Pierson, 2004 Popp, 2006, R&D subsidies and climate policy: is there a free lunch?, Clim. Change, 77, 311, 10.1007/s10584-006-9056-z Quitzow, 2015, Assessing policy strategies for the promotion of environmental technologies: a review of India's National Solar Mission, Res. Policy, 44, 233, 10.1016/j.respol.2014.09.003 Raven, 2005 Rip, 1998, Technological change, 327 Rogge, 2013 Rotmans, 2001, More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy, Foresight, 3, 15, 10.1108/14636680110803003 Schot, 2008, Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manage., 20, 537, 10.1080/09537320802292651 Scrase, 2009, The (non-)politics of managing low carbon socio-technical transitions, Environ. Polit., 18, 707, 10.1080/09644010903157008 Shove, 2007, CAUTION! Transitions ahead: politics, practice, and sustainable transition management, Environ. Plan. A, 39, 763, 10.1068/a39310 Smith, 2012, What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability, Res. Policy, 41, 1025, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012 Soete, 1999, Innovation, knowledge creation and technology policy: the case of the Netherlands, EconPapers, 147, 293 Strunz, 2014, The German energy transition as a regime shift, Ecol. Econ., 100, 150, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.01.019 Suurs, 2009, Cumulative causation in the formation of a technological innovation system: the case of biofuels in the Netherlands, Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, 76, 1003, 10.1016/j.techfore.2009.03.002 Turnheim, 2012, Regime destabilisation as the flipside of energy transitions: lessons from the history of the British coal industry (1913–1997), Energy Policy, 50, 35, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.04.060 Turnheim, 2013, The destabilisation of existing regimes: confronting a multi-dimensional framework with a case study of the British coal industry (1913–1967), Res. Policy, 42, 1749, 10.1016/j.respol.2013.04.009 Tushman, 1986, Technological discontinuities and organizational environments, Adm. Sci. Q., 31, 439, 10.2307/2392832 Unruh, 2000, Understanding carbon lock-in, Energy Policy, 28, 817, 10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7 van den Bergh, 2006, Survival of the greenest: evolutionary economics and policies for energy innovation, Environ. Sci., 3, 57, 10.1080/15693430500481295 Verbong, 2007, The ongoing energy transition: lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004), Energy Policy, 35, 1025, 10.1016/j.enpol.2006.02.010 Walker, 2000, Entrapment in large technology systems: institutional commitment and power relations, Res. Policy, 29, 833, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00108-6 Weber, 2012, Legitimizing research, technology and innovation policies for transformative change: combining insights from innovation systems and multi-level perspective in a comprehensive failures framework, Res. Policy, 41, 1037, 10.1016/j.respol.2011.10.015