Retinal image quality in myopic children undergoing orthokeratology alone or combined with 0.01% atropine

Eye and Vision - Tập 10 - Trang 1-10 - 2023
Qi Tan1, Pauline Cho1, Alex L. K. Ng2,3, George P. M. Cheng4, Victor C. P. Woo2,3, Stephen J. Vincent5
1School of Optometry, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China
2Department of Ophthalmology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
3Hong Kong Ophthalmic Associates, Hong Kong SAR, China
4Hong Kong Laser Eye Centre, Hong Kong SAR, China
5Contact Lens and Visual Optics Laboratory, Centre for Vision and Eye Research, School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

Tóm tắt

The retinal image quality derived from lower-order (LOA) and higher-order aberrations (HOA) for fixed 3-mm and photopic pupil diameters, in children undergoing combined 0.01% atropine and orthokeratology (AOK) versus those receiving orthokeratology alone (OK) over two years was evaluated. The visual Strehl ratio based on the optical transfer function (VSOTF), derived from 2nd- to 4th-order terms (LOA and HOA combined), 2nd-order terms (LOA only), and 3rd- to 4th-order terms (HOA only) for fixed 3-mm and natural photopic pupil diameters, was compared between the two treatment groups. The individual Zernike coefficients for a fixed 3-mm pupil size of 2nd- to 4th-orders, root mean square (RMS) of LOA ( $${Z}_{2}^{0}$$ , $${Z}_{2}^{-2}$$ , and $${Z}_{2}^{2}$$ combined), HOA (3rd to 4th orders inclusive), and Coma ( $${Z}_{3}^{-1}{\mathrm{and }Z}_{3}^{1}$$ combined) were also compared between the two groups. Right eye data of 33 AOK and 35 OK participants were analysed. Under photopic conditions, significantly lower VSOTF based on HOA only was observed in the AOK group compared with that in the OK group at all post-treatment visits (all P < 0.05); however, interactions between HOA and LOA resulted in comparable overall retinal image quality (i.e., VSOTF based on LOA and HOA combined) between the two groups at all visits (all P > 0.05). For a fixed 3-mm pupil size, the VSOTF based on HOA only, LOA only, or HOA and LOA combined, were not different between the two groups (all P > 0.05). AOK participants had slower axial elongation (mean ± SD, 0.17 ± 0.19 mm vs. 0.35 ± 0.20 mm, P < 0.001), a larger photopic pupil size (4.05 ± 0.61 mm vs. 3.43 ± 0.41 mm, P < 0.001) than OK participants, over two years. HOA profile related to an enlarged pupil size may provide visual signal influencing eye growth in the AOK group.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Smith EL 3rd, Hung LF. The role of optical defocus in regulating refractive development in infant monkeys. Vision Res. 1999;39(8):1415–35. Smith EL 3rd, Hung LF, Kee CS, Qiao Y. Effects of brief periods of unrestricted vision on the development of form-deprivation myopia in monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(2):291–9. Howlett MH, McFadden SA. Spectacle lens compensation in the pigmented guinea pig. Vision Res. 2009;49(2):219–27. Smith EL 3rd, Hung LF, Arumugam B. Visual regulation of refractive development: insights from animal studies. Eye (Lond). 2014;28(2):180–8. Schaeffel F, Feldkaemper M. Animal models in myopia research. Clin Exp Optom. 2015;98(6):507–17. Hughes RP, Vincent SJ, Read SA, Collins MJ. Higher order aberrations, refractive error development and myopia control: a review. Clin Exp Optom. 2020;103(1):68–85. Lau JK, Vincent SJ, Collins MJ, Cheung SW, Cho P. Ocular higher-order aberrations and axial eye growth in young Hong Kong children. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):6726. Vincent SJ, Cho P, Chan KY, Fadel D, Ghorbani-Mojarrad N, González-Méijome JM, et al. CLEAR—Orthokeratology. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021;44(2):240–69. Huang J, Wen D, Wang Q, McAlinden C, Flitcroft I, Chen H, et al. Efficacy comparison of 16 interventions for myopia control in children: a network meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2016;123(4):697–708. Chen C, Cheung SW, Cho P. Myopia control using toric orthokeratology (TO-SEE study). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(10):6510–7. Cho P, Cheung SW. Retardation of myopia in orthokeratology (ROMIO) study: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(11):7077–85. Charm J, Cho P. High myopia-partial reduction ortho-k: a 2-year randomized study. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(6):530–9. Zhu MJ, Feng HY, He XG, Zou HD, Zhu JF. The control effect of orthokeratology on axial length elongation in Chinese children with myopia. BMC Ophthalmol. 2014;14:141. Santodomingo-Rubido J, Villa-Collar C, Gilmartin B, Gutiérrez-Ortega R. Myopia control with orthokeratology contact lenses in Spain: refractive and biometric changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(8):5060–5. Hiraoka T, Kakita T, Okamoto F, Takahashi H, Oshika T. Long-term effect of overnight orthokeratology on axial length elongation in childhood myopia: a 5-year follow-up study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(7):3913–9. Walline JJ, Jones LA, Sinnott LT. Corneal reshaping and myopia progression. Br J Ophthalmol. 2009;93(9):1181–5. Chen Q, Li M, Yuan Y, Me R, Yu Y, Shi G, et al. Interaction between corneal and internal ocular aberrations induced by orthokeratology and its influential factors. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:3703854. Lian Y, Shen M, Huang S, Yuan Y, Wang Y, Zhu D, et al. Corneal reshaping and wavefront aberrations during overnight orthokeratology. Eye Contact Lens. 2014;40(3):161–8. Lau JK, Vincent SJ, Cheung SW, Cho P. Higher-order aberrations and axial elongation in myopic children treated with orthokeratology. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61(2):22. Hiraoka T, Kakita T, Okamoto F, Oshika T. Influence of ocular wavefront aberrations on axial length elongation in myopic children treated with overnight orthokeratology. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(1):93–100. Kim J, Lim DH, Han SH, Chung TY. Predictive factors associated with axial length growth and myopia progression in orthokeratology. PLoS One. 2019;14(6):e0218140. Yam JC, Li FF, Zhang X, Tang SM, Yip BHK, Kam KW, et al. Two-year clinical trial of the Low-Concentration Atropine for Myopia Progression (LAMP) study: phase 2 report. Ophthalmology. 2020;127(7):910–9. Chia A, Chua WH, Cheung YB, Wong WL, Lingham A, Fong A, et al. Atropine for the treatment of childhood myopia: safety and efficacy of 0.5%, 0.1%, and 0.01% doses (Atropine for the Treatment of Myopia 2). Ophthalmology. 2012;119(2):347–54. Kinoshita N, Konno Y, Hamada N, Kanda Y, Shimmura-Tomita M, Kaburaki T, et al. Efficacy of combined orthokeratology and 0.01% atropine solution for slowing axial elongation in children with myopia: a 2-year randomised trial. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):12750. Zhao W, Li Z, Hu Y, Jiang J, Long W, Cui D, et al. Short-term effects of atropine combined with orthokeratology (ACO) on choroidal thickness. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2021;44(3):101348. Tan Q, Ng AL, Cheng GP, Woo VC, Cho P. Combined 0.01% atropine with orthokeratology in childhood myopia control (AOK) study: a 2-year randomized clinical trial. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2023;46(1):101723. Cho P, Tan Q. Myopia and orthokeratology for myopia control. Clin Exp Optom. 2019;102(4):364–77. Liu Y, Wildsoet C. The effective add inherent in 2-zone negative lenses inhibits eye growth in myopic young chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(8):5085–93. Liu Y, Wildsoet C. The effect of two-zone concentric bifocal spectacle lenses on refractive error development and eye growth in young chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(2):1078–86. McBrien NA, Arumugam B, Gentle A, Chow A, Sahebjada S. The M4 muscarinic antagonist MT-3 inhibits myopia in chick: evidence for site of action. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2011;31(5):529–39. Arumugam B, McBrien NA. Muscarinic antagonist control of myopia: evidence for M4 and M1 receptor-based pathways in the inhibition of experimentally-induced axial myopia in the tree shrew. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(9):5827–37. Vincent SJ, Tan Q, Ng ALK, Cheng GPM, Woo VCP, Cho P. Higher order aberrations and axial elongation in combined 0.01% atropine with orthokeratology for myopia control. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020;40(6):728–37. Tan Q, Ng AL, Cheng GP, Woo VC, Cho P. Combined atropine with orthokeratology for myopia control: study design and preliminary results. Curr Eye Res. 2019;44(6):671–8. Thibos LN, Lopez-Gil N, Bradley A. What is a troland? J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2018;35(5):813–6. Ginis HS, Plainis S, Pallikaris A. Variability of wavefront aberration measurements in small pupil sizes using a clinical Shack-Hartmann aberrometer. BMC Ophthalmol. 2004;4:1. Schwiegerling J. Scaling Zernike expansion coefficients to different pupil sizes. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2002;19(10):1937–45. Applegate RA, Donnelly WJ 3rd, Marsack JD, Koenig DE, Pesudovs K. Three-dimensional relationship between high-order root-mean-square wavefront error, pupil diameter, and aging. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2007;24(3):578–87. Salmon TO, van de Pol C. Evaluation of a clinical aberrometer for lower-order accuracy and repeatability, higher-order repeatability, and instrument myopia. Optometry. 2005;76(8):461–72. Thibos LN, Hong X, Bradley A, Applegate RA. Accuracy and precision of objective refraction from wavefront aberrations. J Vis. 2004;4(4):329–51. Marsack JD, Thibos LN, Applegate RA. Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. J Vis. 2004;4(4):322–8. Mahajan VN. Strehl ratio of a Gaussian beam. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2005;22(9):1824–33. Marcos S, Burns SA. On the symmetry between eyes of wavefront aberration and cone directionality. Vision Res. 2000;40(18):2437–47. Hughes RPJ, Read SA, Collins MJ, Vincent SJ. Higher order aberrations and retinal image quality during short-term accommodation in children. Vision Res. 2021;188:74–84. Collins MJ, Buehren T, Iskander DR. Retinal image quality, reading and myopia. Vision Res. 2006;46(1–2):196–215. Philip K, Sankaridurg P, Holden B, Ho AMitchell P. Influence of higher order aberrations and retinal image quality in myopisation of emmetropic eyes. Vision Res. 2014;105:233–43. Tan Q, Ng AL, Choy BN, Cheng GP, Woo VC, Cho P. One-year results of 0.01% atropine with orthokeratology (AOK) study: a randomised clinical trial. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020;40(5):557–66. Tan Q, Ng AL, Cheng GP, Woo VC, Cho P. Repeatability of pupil size measurements with NIDEK OPD-Scan III in myopic children. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2021;41(2):431–6. Hiraoka T, Miyata K, Nakamura Y, Miyai T, Ogata M, Okamoto F, et al. Influences of cycloplegia with topical atropine on ocular higher-order aberrations. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(1):8–13. Plainis S, Ginis HS, Pallikaris A. The effect of ocular aberrations on steady-state errors of accommodative response. J Vis. 2005;5(5):466–77. Thibos LN, Bradley A, Liu T, López-Gil N. Spherical aberration and the sign of defocus. Optom Vis Sci. 2013;90(11):1284–91. Thibos LN, Bradley A, López-Gil N. Modelling the impact of spherical aberration on accommodation. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2013;33(4):482–96. Buehren T, Iskander DR, Collins MJ, Davis B. Potential higher-order aberration cues for sphero-cylindrical refractive error development. Optom Vis Sci. 2007;84(3):163–74.