Stakeholder perceptions of Environmental Management Plans as an environmental protection tool for major developments in the UK

Environmental Impact Assessment Review - Tập 56 - Trang 60-71 - 2016
Sophie Bennett1, Simon Kemp1, Malcolm D. Hudson1,2
1Faculty of Engineering and the Environment, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom
2Institute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, SO17 1BJ, United Kingdom

Tài liệu tham khảo

Arts, 2001, Environmental Impact Assessment follow-up: good practice and future directions — findings from a workshop at the IAIA 2000 Conference, Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 19, 175, 10.3152/147154601781767014 Bird, 2005, How I stopped dreading and learned to love transcription, Qual. Inq., 11, 226, 10.1177/1077800404273413 Boyatzis, 1998 Boyden, 2002, Keeping a promise: the implementation of mitigation measures in environmental impact assessment Braun, 2006, Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qual. Res. Psychol., 3, 77, 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa Briggs, 2006, 78 Broderick, 2006, Environmental Impact Assessment and Environmental Management Plans — an example of an integrated process from the UK, vol. 89 Dayo, 2002, Environmental assessment follow-up program as a component of the Nigerian EIA process: an appraisal Dipper, 1998, Monitoring and post-auditing in environmental impact assessment: a review, J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 41, 731, 10.1080/09640569811399 Dik, 2002, The influence of EIA approval conditions on environmental practices DOE (Department of Energy), 2015 Durning, 2012, Environmental Management Plans – Origins, Usage and Development Eccleston, 2002, Integrating environmental impact assessment with environmental management systems, Environ. Qual. Manag., 1-13 Finkbeiner, 1998, A comprehensive approach towards product and organisation related environmental management tools: life cycle assessment (ISO 14040) and environmental management systems (ISO 14001), Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 3, 169, 10.1007/BF02978825 Foody, 1993 Fuller, 2012, EIA–EMS link from the flood risk management sector Gallardo, 2004, Follow-up of a road building scheme in a fragile environment, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 24, 47, 10.1016/S0195-9255(03)00136-7 Glasson, 2013 Hammond, 2007, Environmental management of UK golf courses for biodiversity — attitudes and actions, Landsc. Urban Plan., 83, 127, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.03.004 Holbrook, 2003, Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing of national probability samples with long questionnaires, Public Opin. Q., 67, 79, 10.1086/346010 Hollands, 2014, EIA and EMS integration: not wasting the opportunity, Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 32, 43, 10.1080/14615517.2014.875670 Hui, 2002, e-IA follow-up: internet-based reporting IEMA, 2008, Practitioner: Environmental Management Plans ISO, International Organization for Standardization, 2015 ISO, International Organization for Standardization, 2013, 2013 Jay, 2007, Environmental impact assessment: retrospect and prospect, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 27, 287, 10.1016/j.eiar.2006.12.001 Lave, 1991 Fink, 2003 Fink, 1998 Lewis, 2014, Examining the fate of local great crested newt populations following licensed developments Marshall, 2002, Developing environmental management systems to deliver mitigation and protect the EIA process during follow up, Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 20, 286, 10.3152/147154602781766618 Marshall, 2004, Can industry benefit from participation in EIA follow-up?, 118 Marshall, 2005, Environmental impact assessment follow-up and its benefits for industry, Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 23, 191, 10.3152/147154605781765571 Mohamad-Said, 2002 Mordue, 2008 Morrison-Saunders, 2003, EIA follow-up — lessons from practice: towards successful follow-up, Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 21, 43, 10.3152/147154603781766527 Morrison-Saunders, 2004, Introduction, 1 Morrison-Saunders, 2007 Morrow, 2002, Adopting corporate environmental management systems: motivations and results of ISO14001 and EMAS certification, Environ. Manag. J., 20, 159 Nitz, 2000, Does environmental impact assessment facilitate environmental management activities?, J. Environ. Assess. Policy Manag., 2, 1, 10.1142/S1464333200000035 Obradovic, 2011, Linking EIA with EMS: the way to environmental protection excellence ODA (Overseas Development Administration), 1998 Oppenheim, 1992 Palframan, 2010, The Integration of EIA and EMS systems: experience from the UK Perdicoulis, 2012 Ridgway, 2005, Environmental management system provides tools for delivering on environmental impact assessment commitments, Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 23, 325, 10.3152/147154605781765373 Ritchie, 1994, Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research, 173 Rondinelli, 2000, Panacea, common sense, or just a label? The value of ISO 14001 environmental management systems, Eur. Manag. J., 18, 499, 10.1016/S0263-2373(00)00039-6 Sánchez, 2002, An approach to linking environmental impact assessment and environmental management systems, Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 20, 25, 10.3152/147154602781766843 Siedman, 2006 Slinn, 2007, Connecting EIA to environmental management systems: lessons from industrial estate developments in England, Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag., 14, 88, 10.1002/csr.120 Tinker, 2005, Impact mitigation: impact mitigation in environmental impact assessment: paper promises or the basis of consent conditions?, Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 23, 4, 10.3152/147154605781765463 Van Lamoen, 2002, EIA follow-up for road projects: what do we want and need to know? Wessels, 2013, Factors that influence the independence of EIA follow-up verifiers: a developing country perspective, Impact Assess. Proj. Apprais., 31, 169, 10.1080/14615517.2013.820510 Wlodarczyk, 2000, Improving monitoring and follow-up in Canadian Environmental Assessments’, presented at Back to the Future: Where will Impact Assessment be in 10years and How Do We Get There? Wood, 1999, Post-development auditing of EIA predictive techniques: a spatial analytical approach, J. Environ. Plan. Manag., 42, 671, 10.1080/09640569910948