Subjects and the θ-criterion

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 6 - Trang 1-17 - 1988
Howard Lasnik1
1Department of Linguistics, U-145, The University of Connecticut, Storrs, USA

Tóm tắt

In conclusion, I have proposed that subject is a role relevant to an extension of the θ-criterion, and that there are two structural positions to which it can potentially be assigned — NP of S (or NP), and object ofby. I have suggested that while some difficulties remain, certain properties of nominals and of passive sentences follow directly — in the former case, the incompatibility of a subject genitive with aby-NP; in the latter, the general inability of an implicit agent to serve as a controller. Whether the residual difficulties can be overcome and whether these proposals will prove to be consistent with a wider range of phenomena are questions for future research.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Anderson, M.: 1979,Noun Phrase Structure, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut. ——: 1985, ‘Prenominal Genitive NPs’,The Linguistic Review 3, 1–24. Bresnan, J.: 1972,Theory of Complementation in English Syntax, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. Chomsky, N.: 1965,Aspects of the Theory of Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass. ——: 1970, ‘Remarks on Nominalization’, in R. Jacobs and P.S. Rosenbaum (eds.),Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn & Co., Waltham, Mass. ——: 1981,Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht. ——: 1986,Knowledge of Language, Praeger, New York. Higginbotham, J.: 1983, ‘Logical Form, Binding and Nominals’,Linguistic Inquiry 14, 395–420. Higgins, F. R.: 1976,The Pseudo-Cleft Construction in English, Indiana University Linguistics Club (revised version of 1973 MIT Ph.D. dissertation). Jaeggli, O.: 1986, ‘Passive’,Linguistic Inquiry 17, 582–622. Johnson, K.: 1985,A Case for Movement, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. Kajita, M.: 1967,A Generative-Transformational Study of Semi-Auxiliaries in Present-day American English, Sanseido, Tokyo. Kayne, R.: 1981, ‘Unambiguous Paths’, in R. May and J. Koster (eds.),Levels of Syntactic Representation, Foris, Dordrecht. Lasnik, H. and R. Fiengo: 1974, ‘Complement Object Deletion’,Linguistic Inquiry 5, 535–571. Manzini, M.R.: 1983, ‘On Control and Control Theory’,Linguistic Inquiry 14, 421–446. Marantz, A.: 1984,On the Nature of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass. Rappaport, M.: 1982, ‘On the Nature of Derived Nominals’, unpublished ms. MIT. Roeper, T.: 1987, ‘Implicit Arguments and the Head-Complement Relation’,Linguistic Inquiry 18, 267–310. Williams, E.: 1974,Rule Ordering in Syntax, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. ——: 1982, ‘The NP Cycle’,Linguistic Inquiry 13, 277–295. ——: 1985, ‘PRO and Subject of NP’,Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 297–315. Zubizaretta, M.-L.: 1982,On the Relationship of the Lexicon to Syntax, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.