Organisation structure and innovation performance in different environments

Small Business Economics - Tập 39 - Trang 301-317 - 2010
Andy Cosh1, Xiaolan Fu2, Alan Hughes3
1Centre for Business Research, Queens’ College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
2Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
3Centre for Business Research, Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

Tóm tắt

This paper examines the relationship between organisation structure and innovation performance in a large sample of UK small and medium-sized enterprises. It asks whether there is an optimal structure and whether this differs between different firm environments and between young and older firms. We find that the influences on the ability to innovate differ from those on the commercialisation of innovations. We show that decentralised decision-making, supported by a formal structure and written plans, supports the ability to innovate in most circumstances and is superior to other structures. We also find some evidence that young firms operating in high technology sectors with informal structures have a greater tendency to be innovative. In addition, we find very few differences between young and older firms in terms of their optimal structures in low technology sectors.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Athey, S., & Roberts, J. (2001). Organizational design: Decision rights and incentive contracts. Organizational Economics, 91, 200–205. Atkinson, J., & Meager, N. (1994). Running to stand still: The small firm in the labour market. In J. Atkinson & D. Storey (Eds.), Employment, the small firm and the labour market (pp. 28–102). London and New York: Routledge. Audretsch, D. B. (2001). Research issues relating to structure, competition and performance of small technology-based firms. Small Business Economics, 16, 37–51. Black, S. E., & Lynch, L. M. (2004). What’s driving the new economy?: the benefits of workplace innovation. The Economic Journal, 114, 97–116. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The management of innovation. London: Tavistock Publications. Butchart, R. L. (1987). A new definition of the high technology industries, economic trends. London: HMSO. Cosh, A. D., & Hughes, A. (2003). Enterprise challenged: Policy and performance in the British SME sector 1999–2002. Cambridge: ESRC Centre for Business Research University of Cambridge. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75–87. Curran, J. (1986). Bolton fifteen years on: A review and analysis of small business research in Britain (pp. 1971–1986). London: Small Business Research Trust. Dalton, D. R., Tudor, W. D., et al. (1980). Organisation structure and performance: A critical review. Academy of Management Review, 5, 49–64. Daly, M. (1987). Lifespan of businesses registered for VAT. British Business, 3(April), 28–29. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organisational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555–590. Foss, N. J., & Laursen, K. (2005). Performance pay, delegation and multitasking under uncertainty and innovativeness: An empirical investigation. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organisation, 58, 246–276. Green, K. M., Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (2008). Exploring the relationship between strategic reactiveness and entrepreneurial orientation: The role of structure-style fit. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 356–383. Khandwalla, P. N. (1976/1977). Some top management styles, their context and performance. Organization and Administrative Sciences, 7, 21–52. Kimberly, J. R. (1976). Organizational size and the structuralist perspective: A review, critique and proposal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 571–597. Laursen, K., & Foss, N. J. (2003). New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27, 243–263. Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27, 131–150. Meijaard, J., Brand, M. J., & Mosselman, M. (2005). Organisational structure and performance in Dutch small firms. Small Business Economics, 25, 83–96. Simonen, J., & McCann, P. (2008). Innovation R&D cooperation and labour recruitment: Evidence from Finland. Small Business Economics, 31, 181–194. Sine, W. D., Mitsuhashi, H., & Kirsch, D. A. (2006). Revisiting Burns and Stalker: Formal structure and new venture performance in emerging economic sectors. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 121–132. Stinchcombe, A. (1965). Social structure and organizations. In J. March (Ed.), Handbook of organizations (pp. 142–193). Chicago: Rand McNally. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533. Vaona, A., & Pianta, M. (2008). Firm size and innovation in European manufacturing. Small Business Economics, 30, 283–299. Wally, S., & Baum, J. R. (1994). Personal and structural determinants of the pace of strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 932–956.