Dynamics in higher education politics: a theoretical model
Tóm tắt
This article presents a model for analysing dynamics in higher education politics (DHEP). Theoretically the model draws on the conceptual history of political contingency, agenda-setting theories and previous research on higher education dynamics. According to the model, socio-historical complexity can best be analysed along two dimensions: the political situation and political possibilities. Politics as a situation connotes the idea of an opportune moment when politics can be changed, and political possibilities concern the different alternatives the actors see in different situations. Depending on whether the situation is favourable or unfavourable to change, and on whether the possibilities are politicised or settled, the DHEP model introduces four types of dynamic: reform, gridlock, consensual change and friction. On the empirical level the model has been tested and developed in the context of Finnish higher education by means of interviews and documentary material. It was found, in the Finnish context, that four policy threads functioned according to each of the dynamics. It appears from the empirical findings that dynamics in higher education politics are strongly related to changes that are external to the higher-education system, the changing positions of the actors in different policy threads and the unexpected nature of the dynamics. The DHEP can also be used to shed light on the effects of the silent, settled possibilities that may enable or disable other policy threads within a higher education system.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Baumgartner, F. R., Green-Pedersen, C., & Jones, B. D. (2006). Comparative studies of policy agendas. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(7), 959–974.
Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (2009). Agendas and instability in American politics (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
Bleiklie, I. (2000). Policy regimes and policy making. In M. Kogan, M. Bauer, I. Bleiklie, & M. Henkel (Eds.), Transforming higher education. A comparative study (pp. 53–87). London: Jessica Kingsley.
Bleiklie, I., Høstaker, R., & Vabø, A. (2000). Policy and practice in higher education. Reforming Norwegian Universities. Higher Education Policy Series 49. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Cerych, L., & Sabatier, P. (1986). Great expectations and mixed performance: The implementation of higher education reforms in Europe. Trentham: Trentham Books.
Clark, B. R. (2008). The problem of complexity in modern higher education [Originally 1993]. In B. R. Clark (Ed.), On higher education. Selected writings, 1956–2006 (pp. 385–404). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Corbett, A. (2005). Universities and the Europe of knowledge. Ideas, institutions and policy entrepreneurship in European union higher education policy, 1955–2005. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
de Boer, H., Enders, J., & Schimanck, U. (2007). Comparing higher education governance systems in four European Countries. In N. C. Soguel & P. Jaccard (Eds.), Governance and performance of education systems (pp. 35–54). Dordrecht: Springer.
Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a relational sociology. The American Journal of Sociology, 103(2), 281–317.
European Commission. (2006). Creating an innovative Europe. Report of the Independent Expert Group on R&D and Innovation appointed following the Hampton Court Summit and chaired by Mr. Esko Aho. January 2006. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/aho_report.pdf. Accessed 9 November 2011.
Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education, 56(3), 325–348.
Finnish Government. (2009). Governments communication on Finland’s national innovation strategy to the parliament. http://www.tem.fi/files/21010/National_Innovation_Strategy_March_2009.pdf. Accessed 9 November 2011.
Frackmann, E. (1992). The role of buffer institutions in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 5(3), 14–17.
Gornizka, Å., Maassen, P., Olsen, J. P., & Stensaker, B. (2007). “Europe of Knowledge”: Search for a new pact. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 181–214). Dordrecht: Springer.
Greek Anthology, V. (1918). In E. Capps, T. E. Page, & W. H. D. Rouse (Eds.), New York, NY: G.P. Putnam’s sons. http://www.archive.org/stream/greekanthology05newyuoft. Accessed 9 November 2011.
Jenkins-Smith, H. C., & Sabatier, P. A. (1993). The study of public policy processes. In P. A. Sabatier & H. C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.), Policy change and learning. An advocacy coalition approach (pp. 1–9). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Kauko, J. (2011). Korkeakoulupolitiikan dynamiikat Suomessa [Dynamics of Higher Education Politics in Finland]. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Behavioural Sciences. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-10-6984-0. Accessed 9 November 2011.
Kauko, J., Simola, H., Varjo, J., & Kalalahti, M. (2012). What could a dynamics perspective contribute to comparative research? In J. Kivirauma, A. Jauhianen, P. Seppänen & T. Kaunisto (Eds.), Koulutuksen yhteiskunnallinen ymmärrys. Social Perspectives on Education (pp. 213–227). Research in Educational Sciences 59. Helsinki: Finnish Educational Research Association.
Kingdon, J. W. (2003). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies (2nd ed.). New York: Longman.
Kogan, M., Bauer, M., Bleiklie, I., & Henkel, M. (2000). Change and continuity. Some conclusions. In M. Kogan & S. Hanney (Eds.), Reforming higher education (pp. 199–214). London: Jessica Kingsley.
Kogan, M., & Hanney, S. (2000). Reforming higher education. Higher Education Policy 50. London: Jessica Kingsley.
Martinez, M. C. (2002). Understanding state higher education systems. Applying a new framework. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(3), 349–374.
Mayntz, R., & Scharpf, F. W. (1995). Der Ansatz des akteurzentrierten Institutionalismus [The actor-centred approach to institutionalism]. In R. Mayntz & F. W. Scharpf (Eds.), Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung [Societal self-regulation and political steering] (pp. 39–72). New York, NY: Campus Verlag.
Meister-Scheytt, C., & Scheytt, T. (2005). The complexity of change in universities. Higher Education Quarterly, 59(1), 76–99.
Metcalfe, A. S. (2008). Theorizing research policy: A framework for higher education. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 241–275). Dordrecht: Springer.
Miettinen, R. (2002). National innovation system. Scientific concept or political rhetoric. Helsinki: Edita.
Mills, M. R. (2007). Stories of politics and policy: Florida’s higher education governance reorganization. The Journal of Higher Education, 78(2), 162–187.
Neave, G. (1992). On bodies vile and bodies beautiful: The role of ‘Buffer’ institutions between universities and State. Higher Education Policy, 5(3), 10–17.
Nóvoa, A., & Yariv-Mashal, T. (2003). Comparative research in education: A mode of governance or a historical journey? Comparative Education, 39(4), 423–439.
OECD. (2009). OECD reviews for tertiary education. Finland. [Written by John Davies, Thomas Weko, Lillemor Kim and Erik Thulstrup]. OECD.
Olsen, J. P. (2007). The institutional dynamics. In P. Maassen & J. P. Olsen (Eds.), University dynamics and European integration (pp. 25–34). Dordrecht: Springer.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Palonen, K. (1993). Introduction: From policy and polity to politicking and politicization. In K. Palonen & T. Parvikko (Eds.), Reading the political: Exploring the margins of politics (pp. 6–16). Helsinki: The Finnish Political Science Association.
Palonen, K. (2003). Four times of politics: Policy, polity, politicking, and politicization. Alternatives, 28(2), 171–186.
Palonen, K. (2006). The struggle with time. A conceptual history of ‘Politics’ as an activity. Hamburg: Verlag Münster.
Palonen, K. (2007). Politics or the political? An historical perspective on a contemporary non-debate. European Political Science, 6(1), 69–78.
Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time. History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Richardson, R. C., Bracco, K. R., Callan, P. M., & Finney, J. E. (1999). Designing state higher education systems for a new century. Phoenix, AZ: The Oryx Press.
Saarinen, T. (2007). Quality on the move. Jyväskylä studies in humanities 83. Jyväskylä: University of Jyväskylä.
Saarinen, T., & Välimaa, J. (2006). Muutos korkeakoulupolitiikan tutkimuksessa [Change in higher education studies]. In J. Ursin & J. Välimaa (Eds.), Korkeakoulutus teoriassa [Higher education in theory] (pp. 91–111). Jyväskylä: Koulutuksen tutkimuslaitos, Jyväskylän yliopisto.
Sabatier, P. A. (1987). Knowledge, policy-oriented learning, and policy change. An advocacy coalition framework. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 8(4), 649–692.
Sabatier, P. A. (1993). Policy change over a decade or more. In P. A. Sabatier & H. C. Jenkins-Smith (Eds.), Policy change and learning. An advocacy coalition approach (pp. 13–39). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A. (2005). From policy implementation to policy change: A personal odyssey. In Å. Gornitzka, M. Kogan, & A. Amaral (Eds.), Reform and change in higher education (pp. 17–34). Dordrecht: Springer.
Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play: Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Scott, R. W. (2008). Institutions and organizations (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Simola, H., Rinne, R., Varjo, J., Pitkänen, H., & Kauko, J. (2009). Quality assurance and evaluation (QAE) in Finnish compulsory schooling: A national model or just unintended effects of radical decentralisation? Journal of Education Policy, 24(2), 163–178.
Simola, H., Varjo, J., & Rinne, R. (2011). À contre-courant: dépendance au sentier, convergence et contingence. Vers une meilleure compréhension du modèle finlandais d’assurance-qualité et d’évaluation. [Against the Flow—Path dependence, convergence and contingency in understanding the Finnish QAE model]. Éducation et Sociétés: Revue internationale de sociologie de l’éducation, 28 (2), 35–51.
Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2005). From “Endless Frontier” to “Basic Science for Use”: Social contracts between science and society. Science, Technology and Human Values, 30(4), 536–572.
Temmes, M. (1996). Hallintopolitiikan rakennedoktriinit [The structural doctrines in governance policy]. Hallinnon tutkimus, 15(2), 90–109.
Temmes, M. (1998). Finland and new public management. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 64(3), 441–456.
Tiili, M. (2008). Ministers as strategic political leaders? Strategic political steering after NPM reforms in Finland. Acta Politica 34. Helsinki: Department of Political Science, University of Helsinki.
Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö. (2008). Kansallinen innovaatiostrategia. Helsinki: Työ- ja elinkeinoministeriö.
Ursin, J., & Saarinen, T. (2012). Dominant and emerging approaches in the study of higher education policy change. Studies in Higher Education 37(2), 143–156.
Ursin, J., Välimaa, J., & Aittola, H. (2010). Towards joint educational structures and practices. Experiences from the mergers of Finnish Universities. Paper presented in the EERA-conference, 25 August 2010, Helsinki.
Ursin, J., Välimaa, J., & Aittola, H. (2011). Yliopistot yhdistyvät – muuttuuko koulutus? [Universities merge – does education change?] In R. Rinne, A. Jauhiainen, J. Tähtinen ja M. Broberg (Eds.), Koulutuspolitiikan käytännöt kansallisessa ja ylikansallisessa kehyksessä [Practises of education politics in national and international frames] (pp. 125–144). Kasvatusalan tutkimuksia 54. Turku: Suomen kasvatustieteellinen seura.
Välimaa, J. (2005). Social dynamics of higher education reforms: The case of finland. In Å. Gornitzka, M. Kogan & A. Amaral (Eds.), Reform and change in higher education. Analysing policy implementation (pp. 245–268). Dordrecht: Springer.
Välimaa, J., & Hoffman, D. (2008). Knowledge society discourse and higher education. Higher Education, 56, 265–285.
Vanttaja, M., & Ketonen, K. (1995). Korkeakoululaitoksen rakenteellinen kehittäminen. Tapaustutkimus lääketieteen ja kasvatustieteen koulutusaloilta. [The structural development of higher education system. A case study on the disciplines of medicine and education]. Koulutussosiologian tutkimuskeskuksen raportteja 28. Turku: University of Turku.
Zahariadis, N. (1999). Ambiguity, time, and multiple streams. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 73–93). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.