Ecological footprint time series of Austria, the Philippines, and South Korea for 1961–1999: comparing the conventional approach to an ‘actual land area’ approach

CDIAC, 1999. Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Fossil-Fuel Consumption and Cement Manufacture. Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center (CDIAC), http://cdiac.esd.ornl.gov. Erb, K.-H., 2004. Actual land demand of Austria 1926–2000: a variation on ecological Footprint assessments. Land Use Policy, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.010. FAO, 1998. Global Fibre Supply Model Food. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). FAO, 1999. FAOSTAT 98. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). FAO, 2000. Forest Resource Assessment 2000. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), Forestry Department. Fischer, G., Makowski, M., Granat, J., 1999. AEZWIN: An interactive multiple-criteria analysis tool for land resources appraisal. Rome, World Soil Resources Reports. Haberl, 2001, How to calculate and interpret ecological footprints for long periods of time, Ecological Economics, 38, 25, 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00152-5 Imhoff, 1997, Using nighttime DMSP/OLS images of city lights to estimate the impact of urban land use on soil resources in the United States, Remote Sensing of the Environment, 59, 105, 10.1016/S0034-4257(96)00110-1 IIASA and FAO, 2000. Global Agro-Ecological Zones (GAEZ) 2000 CD-ROM. Rome, International Institute for Applied Systems Analsis (IIASA) and Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Krausmann, 2001, Land use and industrial modernisation, Land Use Policy, 18, 17, 10.1016/S0264-8377(00)00042-9 Krausmann, F., Haberl, H., Karl-Heinz E., Wackernagel, M., 2004. Resource flows and land use: using the MEFA framework to monitor society-nature interaction for sustainability. Land Use Policy, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.005. Lenzen, 2001, A modified ecological footprint method and its application to Australia, Ecological Economics, 37, 229, 10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00275-5 Loh, J. (Ed.), 2002. Living Planet Report 2002. Gland, Switzerland, World-Wide Fund for Nature International (WWF), UNEP World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Redefining Progress, Center for Sustainability Studies. Luck, 2001, The urban funnel model and the spatially heterogeneous ecological footprint, Ecosystems, 4, 782, 10.1007/s10021-001-0046-8 McNeill, J.R., 2000. Something New Under the Sun: An Environmental History of the Twentieth-Century World. W.W. Norton & Company, Inc., New York Monfreda, C., Wackernagel, M., Deumling, D., 2004. Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biological capacity assessments. Land Use Policy, doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.10.009. Van Vuuren, D.P., Smeets E., deKruijf, H., 1999. The Ecological Footprint of Benin, Bhutan, Costa Rica, and The Netherlands. Bilthoven, NL, RIVM Report. Wackernagel, M., Monfreda, C., Schulz, N.B., Erb, K.-H., Haberl, H., Krausmann, F., 2004. Calculating national and global ecological footprint time series: resolving conceptual challenges. Land Use Policy, submitted for publication. Wackernagel, 2002, Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 99, 9266, 10.1073/pnas.142033699 World Bank, 2002. Global Development Finance & World Development Indicators. Washington, DC, World Bank, Global Development Network Growth Database, www.worldbank.org/research/growth/GDNdata.htm WRI, 2000. World Resources 2000–2001—People and Ecosystems: The Fraying Web of Life. World Resources Institute (WRI), Washington, DC.