Subtotal perirhinal cortex lesions increase exploratory behavior in the rat without producing deficits in the Morris water maze

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 22 - Trang 195-202 - 2013
Kjesten A. Wiig1, David K. Bilkey1
1Department of Psychology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

Tóm tắt

Rats with bilateral, subtotal lesions of the superficial layers of perirhinal cortex were tested in a reaction-to-novelty procedure and in the Morris water maze. Lesioned rats spent significantly more time than did control animals in exploring objects in the reaction-to-novelty test apparatus. In addition, lesioned rats exhibited increased rearing, both in the exploration procedure and in an open field test. Locomotor and grooming activity in lesioned rats was not significantly different from that of control animals. These results suggest that, in the rat, the perirhinal cortex may be involved in the modulation of exploratory behavior, possibly via links with the amygdala. Lesioned rats were not impaired in the Morris water maze; rather, their latencies to find the hidden platform were significantly lower than those of control animals during initial place navigation testing. The latter finding contrasts with the results of our previous work, which demonstrates that more extensive lesions of perirhinal cortex produce water maze deficits.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Blackstad, T. W. (1958). On the termination of some afferents to the hippocampus and fascia dentata. Acta Anatomy, 35, 202–214. Capobianco, S., MacDougall, J. M., & Foster, S. M. (1977). Direct neurobehavioral comparisons within the septohippocampal system. Physiological Psychology, 5, 215–220. Deacon, T. W., Eichenbaum, H., Rosenberg, P., & Eckmann, K. W. (1983). Afferent connections of the perirhinal cortex in the rat. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 220, 168–190. Gaffan, D., & Murray, E. A. (1992). Monkeys with rhinal cortex ablations succeed in object discrimination learning despite 24-hr intervals and fail at matching to sample despite double sample presentations. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 30–38. Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (1983). Comparison between the behavioral effects of septal and hippocampal lesions: A review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 7, 119–188. Hjorth-Simonsen, A. (1972). Projection of the lateral part of the entorhinal area to the hippocampus and fascia dentata. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 146, 219–232. Insauti, R., Amaral, D. G., & Cowan, W. M. (1987). The entorhinal cortex of the monkey: II. Cortical afferents. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 264, 356–395. Jarrard, L. E. (1968). Behavior of hippocampal lesioned rats in home cage and novel situations. Physiology & Behavior, 3, 65–70. Kohler, C., & Sundberg, H. (1977). Locomotor activity and exploratory behavior after medial entorhinal cortex lesions in the albino rat. Behavioral Biology, 20, 419–432. Kosel, K. C., van Hoesen, G. W., & Rosene, D. L. (1983). A direct projection from the perirhinal cortex (area 35) to the subiculum in the rat. Brain Research, 269, 347–351. Lorenzini, C. A., Baldi, E., Bucherelli, C., Giachetti, A., & Tassoni, G. (1991). Effects of nucleus basolateralis amygdalae neurotoxic lesions on some spontaneous activities in the rat. Physiology & Behavior, 50, 1215–1219. Morris, R. G. M., Garrud, P., Rawlins, J. N. P., & O’Keefe, J. (1982). Place navigation impaired in rats with hippocampal lesions. Nature, 297, 681–683. Murphy, L. R., Race, K. E., & Brown, T. S. (1975). Behaviors emitted by rats with limbic lesions during feeding. Behavioral Biology, 15,231–237. Murray, E. A., & Mishkin, M. (1986). Visual recognition in monkeys following rhinal cortical ablations combined with either amygdalectomy or hippocampectomy. Journal of Neuroscience, 6, 1992–2003. Myhrer, T. (1988). Exploratory behavior and reaction to novelty in rats with hippocampal perforant path systems disrupted. Behavioral Neuroscience, 102, 356–362. Myhrer, T. (1989). Exploratory behavior, reaction to novelty, and proactive memory in rats with temporo-entorhinal connections disrupted. Physiology & Behavior, 45, 431–436. Otto, T., & Eichenbaum, H. (1992). Complementary roles of the orbital prefrontal cortex and the perirhinal-entorhinal cortices in an odor-guided delayed-nonmatching-to-sample task. Behavioral Neuroscience, 106, 762–775. Paxinos, G., & Watson, C. (1982). The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. Sydney: Academic Press. Saunders, R. C., & Rosene, D. L. (1988). A comparison of the efferents of the amygdala and the hippocampal formation in the rhesus monkey: I. Convergence in the entorhinal, prorhinal and perirhinal cortices. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 271, 153–184. Schenk, F., & Morris, R. G. M. (1985). Dissociation between components of spatial memory after recovery from the effects of retrohippocampal lesions. Experimental Brain Research, 58, 11–28. Skelton, R. W., & McNamara, R. K. (1992). Bilateral knife cuts to the perforant path disrupt spatial learning in the Morris water maze. Hippocampus, 2, 73–80. Squire, L. R. (1992). Memory and the hippocampus: A synthesis from findings with rats, monkeys and humans. Psychological Review, 99, 195–231. Sutherland, R. J., & McDonald, R. J. (1990). Hippocampus, amygdala and memory deficits in rats. Behavioral Brain Research, 37, 57–79. Suzuki, W. A., & Amaral, D. G. (1990). Cortical inputs to the CA1 field of the monkey hippocampus originate from the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex but not from area TE. Neuroscience Letters, 115, 43–48. Suzuki, W. A., Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L. R., & Amaral, D. G. (1993). Lesions of the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortices in the monkey produce long lasting memory impairment in the visual and tactile modalities. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 2430–2451. Teitelbaum, H., & Milner, P. (1963). Activity changes following partial hippocampal lesions in rats. Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology, 56, 284–289. White, N., & Weingarten, H. (1976). Effects of amygdaloid lesions on exploration by rats. Physiology and Behavior, 17, 73–79. Wiig, K. A., & Bilkey, D. K. (1993, August). The effects of perirhinal cortical lesions on spatial reference memory in the rat. Paper presented at the International Australasian Winter Conference on Brain Research, Queenstown, New Zealand. Witter, M. P., Groenewegen, H. J., Lopes da Silva, F. H., & Lohman, A. H. M. (1989). Functional organization of the extrinsic and intrinsic circuitry of the parahippocampal region. Progress in Neurobiology, 33, 161–253. Zilles, K. (1990). Anatomy of the neocortex: Cytoarchitecture and myeloarchitecture. In B. Kolb & R. C. Tees (Eds.), The cerebral cortex of the rat (pp. 77–112). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L. R., Alvarez-Royo, P., & Clower, R. P. (1991). Independence of memory functions and emotional behavior: Separate contributions of the hippocampal formation and the amygdala. Hippocampus, 1, 207–220. Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L. R., Amaral, D. G., & Suzuki, W. (1989). Lesions of the perirhinal and parahippocampal cortex that spare the amygdala and the hippocampal formation produce severe memory impairment. Journal of Neuroscience, 9, 4335–4370. Zola-Morgan, S., Squire, L. R., Clower, R. P., & Rempel, N. L. (1993). Damage to the perirhinal cortex exacerbates memory impairment following lesions to the hippocampal formation. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 251–265.