Viewing and reading behaviour in a virtual environment

Emerald - Tập 60 Số 3 - Trang 185-198 - 2008
David Nicholas1, Paul Huntington1, Hamid R. Jamali1, Ian Rowlands1, Tom Dobrowolski1, Carol Tenopir2
1Centre for Information Behaviour and the Evaluation of Research (CIBER), School of Library, Archive and Information Studies, University College London, London, UK
2School of Information Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA

Tóm tắt

PurposeThis article aims to focus on usage data in respect to full‐text downloads of journal articles, which is considered an important usage (satisfaction) metric by librarians and publishers. The purpose is to evaluate the evidence regarding full‐text viewing by pooling together data on the full‐text viewing of tens of thousands of users studied as part of a number of investigations of e‐journal databases conducted during the Virtual Scholar research programme.Design/methodology/approachThe paper reviews the web logs of a number of electronic journal libraries including OhioLINK and ScienceDirect using Deep Log Analysis, which is a more sophisticated form of transactional log analysis. The frequency, characteristics and diversity of full‐text viewing are examined. The article also features an investigation into the time spent online viewing full‐text articles in order to get a clearer understanding of the significance of full‐text viewing, especially in regard to reading.FindingsThe main findings are that there is a great deal of variety amongst scholars in their full‐text viewing habits and that a large proportion of views are very cursory in nature, although there is survey evidence to suggest that reading goes on offline.Originality/valueThis is the first time that full‐text viewing evidence is studied on such a large scale.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

Ball, D. (2004), “What's the ‘big deal’, and why is it a bad deal for universities?”, Interlending & Document Supply, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 117‐25.

Bevan, S., Dalton, P. and Conyers, A. (2005), “How usage statistics can inform national negotiations and strategies”, Serials, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 116‐23.

Davis, P.M. (2004), “For electronic journals, total downloads can predict number of users: a multiple regression analysis”, Portal: Libraries and the Academy, Vol. 4 No. 3, pp. 379‐92.

Davis, P.M. (2007), “UKSG usage factor research – an update”, e‐mail discussion to toliblicense‐[email protected] (accessed 11 March 2007).

Friend, F.J. (2003), “Big deal‐good deal? Or is there a better deal?”, Learned Publishing, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 153‐5.

Gargiullo, P. (2003), “Electronic journals and users: the CIBER experience in Italy”, Serials, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 293‐8.

Gedye, R. and Park, T. (2004), “COUNTER – increasing the value of online usage statistics”, Serials, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 155‐8.

Nabe, J. (2001), “E‐journal bundling and its impact on academic libraries: some early results”, Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, No. 30, available at: www.istl.org/01‐spring/article3.html (accessed 20 January 2008), Vol. 20.

Nicholas, D., Huntington, P. and Jamali, H.R. (2007a), “Diversity in the information seeking behaviour of the virtual scholar: institutional comparisons”, Journal of Academic Librarianship, Vol. 33 No. 6, pp. 629‐38.

Nicholas, D., Huntington, P. and Jamali, H.R. (2007b), “Open access in context: a user study”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 63 No. 6, pp. 853‐78.

Nicholas, D., Huntington, P. and Jamali, H.R. (2008), “User diversity: as demonstrated by deep log analysis”, The Electronic Library, Vol. 26 No. 1, pp. 21‐38.

Nicholas, D., Huntington, P. and Watkinson, A. (2005), “Scholarly journal usage: the results of deep log analysis”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 61 No. 2, pp. 248‐80.

Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H.R. and Dobrowolski, T. (2007), “Characterising and evaluating information seeking behaviour in a digital environment: spotlight on the ‘bouncer’”, Information Processing and Management, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 1085‐102.

Nicholas, D., Huntington, P., Jamali, H.R. and Tenopir, C. (2006), “What deep log analysis tells us about the impact of ‘big deal’. Case study OhioLink”, Journal of Documentation, Vol. 62 No. 4, pp. 482‐508.

Obst, O. (2003), “Patterns and costs of printed and online journal usage”, Health Information and Libraries Journal, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 22‐32.

Peters, T.A. (2002), “What's the use? The value of e‐resource usage statistics”, New Library World, Vol. 103 Nos 1/2, pp. 39‐47.

Tenopir, C. and King, D.W. (2000), Towards Electronic Journals: Realities for Scientists, Librarians and Publishers, Special Libraries Association, Washington, DC.

Tenopir, C., King, D.W., Clarke, M.T., Na, K. and Zhou, X. (2007), “Journal reading patterns and preferences of pediatricians”, Journal of the Medical Library Association, Vol. 95 No. 1, pp. 56‐63.

Town, S. (2004), “E‐measures: a comprehensive waste of time?”, Vine, Vol. 34 No. 4, p. 191.

Thông tin
Thông tin xuất bản

Emerald

Tập 60 Số 3

185-198

Thông tin tác giả