Interpreting and Evaluating Meta-Analysis

Evaluation and the Health Professions - Tập 18 Số 4 - Trang 393-407 - 1995
Judith A. Hall1, Robert Rosenthal2
1Northeastern University, Boston, MA 02115, USA
2Harvard University

Tóm tắt

This article offers some guidelines for interpreting and evaluating meta-analytic reviews of research. The fundamental goals of metaanalysis are to combine results across studies to yield an overall estimate of effect and to compare effects between studies in order to understand moderating factors. Suggestions are made for what readers should look for in a meta-analysis, and a discussion is provided of several issues that are not often explicitly addressed: choice of unit of analysis, fixed versus random effects, the meaning of heterogeneity, determination of when contrasts are appropriate, and the choice of measure of central tendency. We recommend that readers adopt a skeptical attitude about the results of meta-analysis, particularly when only complex analyses are reported.

Từ khóa


Tài liệu tham khảo

10.1177/016327879301600101

Cooper, H., 1994, Handbook of research synthesis

Cooper, H. M., 1989, Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews, 2

Glass, G. V, 1981, Meta-analysis in social research

10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.000345

10.1037/0033-2909.85.4.845

Hall, J. A., 1984, Nonverbal sex differences: Communication accuracy and expressive style, 10.56021/9780801824401

10.1016/0277-9536(88)90012-3

10.1016/0277-9536(88)90284-5

10.1016/0277-9536(90)90205-7

10.1080/03637759109376240

10.1097/00005650-198807000-00002

Hall, J. A., 1994, Handbook of research synthesis, 17

10.1177/0272989X9501500112

Hedges, L. V., 1994, Handbook of research synthesis, 285

Hedges, L. V., 1985, Statistical methods for meta-analysis

Hunter, J. E., 1990, Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in researchfindings

10.4159/9780674040243

Light, R. J., 1994, Handbook of research synthesis, 439

10.1161/01.CIR.88.2.523

10.2105/AJPH.72.2.141

Raudenbush, S. W., 1994, Handbook of research synthesis, 301

Rosenthal, R., 1969, Artifact in behavioral research, 181

Rosenthal, R., 1976, Experimenter effects in behavioral research

10.1037/0033-2909.85.1.185

10.1037/0033-2909.86.3.638

10.1037/0022-006X.51.1.4

10.4135/9781412984997

Rosenthal, R., 1994, Handbook of research synthesis, 231

Rosenthal, R., Psychological Bulletin

Rosenthal, R., 1985, Contrast analysis: Focused comparisons in the analysis of variance

Rosenthal, R., 1991, Essentials of behavioral research: Methods and data analysis, 2

10.1017/S0140525X00075506

10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.500

10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.400

10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.332

Shadish, W. R., 1994, Handbookof research synthesis, 261

10.1037/0003-066X.32.9.752

Snedecor, G. W., 1989, Statistical methods, 8

Winer, B. J., 1991, Statisticalprinciples in experimental design, 3