High Nitrogen Availability but Limited Potential Carbon Storage in Anaerobic Digestates from Cover Crops

Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition - Tập 22 - Trang 2891-2896 - 2022
Florent Levavasseur1, Caroline Le Roux2, Patrice Kouakou3, Vincent Jean-Baptiste4, Sabine Houot1
1INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, UMR ECOSYS, Thiverval-Grignon, France
2LDAR, Laboratoire Départemental d’Analyses Et de Recherche de L’Aisne, Laon, France
3INRAE Transfert, Centre INRAE de Narbonne, Narbonne, France
4GRDF, Paris, France

Tóm tắt

Cover crops are increasingly used for biogas production, a renewable energy source, without competing for food production. The behavior of the resulting digestates after soil application is poorly understood, which prevents their efficient recycling in agriculture and the environmental assessment of their application. The objective of this study was to quantify the nitrogen availability and potential carbon storage of cover crop–issued digestates after soil application. A total of 10 raw digestates, 2 liquid phases, and 3 solid phases after phase separation were sampled. Main cover crops used in the sampled biogas plants were winter barley, rye, and maize. Classical physicochemical analyses and laboratory incubations to study their C and N mineralization were conducted. Despite a moderate C mineralization of raw and liquid digestates after 91 days, their initial limited carbon content induced, in the end, a low contribution to soil organic carbon (13 and 11 kg remaining C Mg−1 FM, respectively), similar to a pig slurry and much lower than a bovine manure. With a higher initial carbon content and lower C mineralization, the contribution of solid digestates to carbon storage could be higher if applied at a sufficient rate. Organic N mineralization of raw and liquid digestates was moderate, but their N availability was high (3 and 4 kg available N Mg−1 FM, respectively), thanks to their mineral nitrogen contents, similar again to a pig slurry. In contrast, that of solid digestate was almost null with a very low mineral N content and no organic N mineralization. Finally, all the digestates also brought significant amounts of P and K.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ademe (2018) La France indépendante en gaz en 2050. Un mix de gaz 100% renouvelable en 2050 ? Etude de faisabilité technico-économique. Rapport de l’étude. Available at: https://librairie.ademe.fr/energies-renouvelables-reseaux-et-stockage/1548-mix-de-gaz-100-renouvelable-en-2050--9791029710476.html Bareha Y, Affes R, Moinard V, Buffet J, Girault R (2021) A simple mass balance tool to predict carbon and nitrogen fluxes in anaerobic digestion systems. Waste Manage 135:47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.08.020 Brockmann D, Pradel M, Hélias A (2018) Agricultural use of organic residues in life cycle assessment: current practices and proposal for the computation of field emissions and of the nitrogen mineral fertilizer equivalent. Resour Conserv Recycl 133:50–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.01.034 Cavalli D, Corti M, Baronchelli D, Bechini L, Marino Gallina P (2017) CO2 emissions and mineral nitrogen dynamics following application to soil of undigested liquid cattle manure and digestates. Geoderma 308:26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.08.027 Cayuela ML, Oenema O, Kuikman PJ, Bakker RR, Groenigen JWV (2010) Bioenergy by-products as soil amendments? Implications for carbon sequestration and greenhouse gas emissions. GCB Bioenergy 2:201–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01055.x de la Fuente C, Alburquerque JA, Clemente R, Bernal MP (2013) Soil C and N mineralisation and agricultural value of the products of an anaerobic digestion system. Biol Fertil Soils 49:313–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-012-0719-9 Guilayn F, Jimenez J, Martel J-L, Rouez M, Crest M, Patureau D (2019) First fertilizing-value typology of digestates: a decision-making tool for regulation. Waste Manage 86:67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.01.032 Houot S, Pons MN, Pradel M (2014) Valorisation des matières fertilisantes d’origine résiduaire sur les sols à usage agricole ou forestier. Impacts agronomiques, environnementaux, socio-économiques. Rapport final de l’expertise scientifique collective. Available at : https://www.inrae.fr/actualites/valorisation-agricole-effluents-boues-dechets-organiques Lashermes G, Nicolardot B, Parnaudeau V, Thuriès L, Chaussod R, Guillotin ML, Linères M, Mary B, Metzger L, Morvan T, Tricaud A, Villette C, Houot S (2009) Indicator of potential residual carbon in soils after exogenous organic matter application. Eur J Soil Sci 60:297–310. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01110.x Lazicki P, Geisseler D, Lloyd M (2020) Nitrogen mineralization from organic amendments is variable but predictable. J Environ Qual 49:483–495. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20030 Levavasseur F, Mary B, Christensen BT, Duparque A, Ferchaud F, Kätterer T, Lagrange H, Montenach D, Resseguier C, Houot S (2020) The simple AMG model accurately simulates organic carbon storage in soils after repeated application of exogenous organic matter. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-020-10065-x Levavasseur F, Lashermes G, Mary B, Morvan T, Nicolardot B, Parnaudeau V, Thuriès L, Houot S (2021) Quantifying and simulating carbon and nitrogen mineralization from diverse exogenous organic matters. Soil Use Manag 38:411–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12745 Marsac S, Quod C, Leveau V, Heredia M, Delaye N, Labalette F, Lecomte V, Bazet M, Sanner EA (2019) Optimisation of French energy cover crop production in double cropping systems for on-farm biogas use. European Biomass Conference and Exhibition Proceedings 27th EUBCE-Lisbon 2019, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.5071/27thEUBCE2019-1AO.4.5 Moinard V, Levavasseur F, Houot S (2021) Current and potential recycling of exogenous organic matter as fertilizers and amendments in a French peri-urban territory. Resour Conserv Recycl 169:105523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105523 Möller K, Müller T (2012) Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: a review. Eng Life Sci 12:242–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201100085 Nkoa R (2014) Agricultural benefits and environmental risks of soil fertilization with anaerobic digestates: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 34:473–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0196-z R Development Core Team (2013) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3–900051–07–0. http://www.R-project.org. Vienna, Austria Recous S, Robin D, Darwis D, Mary B (1995) Soil inorganic N availability: Effect on maize residue decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 27:1529–1538. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(95)00096-W Reuland G, Sigurnjak I, Dekker H, Sleutel S, Meers E (2022) Assessment of the carbon and nitrogen mineralisation of digestates elaborated from distinct feedstock profiles. Agronomy 12:456. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020456 Riau V, Burgos L, Camps F, Domingo F, Torrellas M, Antón A, Bonmatí A (2021) Closing nutrient loops in a maize rotation. Catch crops to reduce nutrient leaching and increase biogas production by anaerobic co-digestion with dairy manure. Waste Manage 126:719–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.006 Risberg K, Cederlund H, Pell M, Arthurson V, Schnürer A (2017) Comparative characterization of digestate versus pig slurry and cow manure – chemical composition and effects on soil microbial activity. Waste Manage 61:529–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.12.016 Riva C, Orzi V, Carozzi M, Acutis M, Boccasile G, Lonati S, Tambone F, D’Imporzano G, Adani F (2016) Short-term experiments in using digestate products as substitutes for mineral (N) fertilizer: agronomic performance, odours, and ammonia emission impacts. Sci Total Environ 547:206–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.156 Szerencsits M, Weinberger C, Kuderna M, Feichtinger F, Erhart E, Maier S (2016) Biogas from cover crops and field residues: effects on soil, water, climate and ecological footprint. Int J Environ Ecol Eng 9:413–416. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1126493 Tambone F, Orzi V, Zilio M, Adani F (2019) Measuring the organic amendment properties of the liquid fraction of digestate. Waste Manage 88:21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.03.024 Tuszynska A, Czerwionka K, Obarska-Pempkowiak H (2021) Phosphorus concentration and availability in raw organic waste and post fermentation products. J Environ Manage 278:111468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111468 Van Soest PJ, Wine RH (1967) Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. IV. Determination of plant cell-wall constituents. J Assoc off Anal Chem 50:50–55 Wolf U, Fuß R, Höppner F, Flessa H (2014) Contribution of N2O and NH3 to total greenhouse gas emission from fertilization: results from a sandy soil fertilized with nitrate and biogas digestate with and without nitrification inhibitor. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 100:121–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-014-9631-z