Living the categorical imperative: autistic perspectives on lying and truth telling–between Kant and care ethics

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy - Tập 15 - Trang 271-277 - 2011
Pier Jaarsma1, Petra Gelhaus2, Stellan Welin1
1Division of Health and Society, IMH, University of Linköping, Linköping, Sweden
2Institute for Ethics, History and Philosophy of Medicine, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany

Tóm tắt

Lying is a common phenomenon amongst human beings. It seems to play a role in making social interactions run more smoothly. Too much honesty can be regarded as impolite or downright rude. Remarkably, lying is not a common phenomenon amongst normally intelligent human beings who are on the autism spectrum. They appear to be ‘attractively morally innocent’ and seem to have an above average moral conscientious objection against deception. In this paper, the behavior of persons with autism with regard to deception and truthfulness will be discussed in the light of two different ethical theories, illustrated by fragments from autobiographies of persons with autism. A systemizing ‘Kantian’ and an empathizing ‘ethics of care’ perspective reveal insights on high-functioning autism, truthfulness and moral behavior. Both perspectives are problematic from the point of view of a moral agent with autism. High-functioning persons with autism are, generally speaking, strong systemizes and weak empathizers. Particularly, they lack ‘cognitive empathy’ which would allow them to understand the position of the other person. Instead, some tend to invent a set of rules that makes their behavior compatible with the expectations of others. From a Kantian point of view, the autistic tendency to always tell the truth appears praiseworthy and should not be changed, though it creates problems in the social life of persons with autism. From a care ethics perspective, on the other hand, a way should be found to allow the high-functioning persons with autism to respect the feelings and needs of other persons as sometimes overruling the duty of truthfulness. We suggest this may even entail ‘morally educating’ children and adolescents with autism to become socially skilled empathic ‘liars’.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Barnbaum, D.R. 2008. The ethics of Autism; among them, but not of them. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. Baron-Cohen, S. 1999. Can studies of autism teach us about consciousness of the physical and the mental? Philosophical Explorations 2(3): 175–188. Baron-Cohen, S. 2008. Autism, hypersystemizing, and truth. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 61(1): 64–75. Birch, J. 2003. Congratulations! it’s asperger syndrome. Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. DePaulo, B.M., D.A. Kashy, S.E. Kirkendol, M.M. Wyer, and J.A. Epstein. 1996. Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70: 979–995. Fallis, D. 2010. Lying and deception. Philosophers’ imprint 10(11): 1–22. Fitzgerald, M. 2005. The genesis of artistic creativity: Asperger’s syndrome and the arts. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Fitzgerald, M. 2010. Young, violent, and dangerous to know. Hauppauge, New York: Nova Science Publishers. Fleisher, M. 2003. Making sense of the unfeasible : My life journey with asperger syndrome. Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Gavrilets, S., and A. Vose. 2006. The dynamics of Machiavellian intelligence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 103(45): 16823–16828. Grandin, T. 2006. Thinking in Pictures: My Life with Autism, Expanded Edition ed. Westminster, Maryland: Knopf Publishing Group. Greenspan, P. 2004. Emotions, rationality and mind/body. In Thinking about feeling; contemporary philosophers on emotions, ed. R.C. Solomon. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Guseinov, A.A. 2010. What Kant said, or why is it impermissible to lie for the good? Russian Studies in Philosophy 48(3): 26–47. Kant, I. 2002. Groundwork for the metaphysics of morals. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. Kennett, J. 2002. Autism, empathy and moral agency. The Philosophical Quarterly 52(208): 340–357. Kleinman, J., P.L. Marciano, and R.L. Ault. 2001. Advanced theory of mind in high-functioning adults with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 31: 29–36. Korsgaard, C. 1996. Creating the kingdom of ends. New York: Cambridge University Press. Kuhn, T.S. 1977. The essential tension; selected studies in scientific tradition and change. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Lawson, W. 2009. Single attention and associated cognition in autism (SAACA). PhD thesis, Deakin University. Mór, C. 2007. Blessing and a curse: Autism and me. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Nordenfelt, L. 1987. On the nature of health. Dordrecht: Reidel. Nussbaum, M. 2004. Emotions as judgments of value and importance. In Thinking about feeling; contemporary philosophers on emotions, ed. R.C. Solomon. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Nyberg, D. 1993. The varnished truth: Truth telling and deceiving in ordinary life. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. Purkis, J. 2006. Finding a different kind of normal: Misadventures with asperger syndrome. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Schneider, E.W. 1999. Discovering my autism: Apologia pro vita sua (With Apologies to Cardinal Newman). London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. Shapiro, T. 2006. Kantian rigorism and mitigating circumstance. Ethics 117: 32–57. Shoemaker, D. 2007. Moral address, moral responsibility, and the boundaries of the moral community. Ethics 118: 70–108. Slote, M. 2007. The ethics of care and empathy. New York/Routledge. Smith, A. 2006. Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behavior and evolution. The Psychological Record 56(1): 3–21. Smith, A. 2009. The empathy imbalance hypothesis of autism: A theoretical approach to cognitive and emotional empathy in autistic development. The Psychological Record 59(3): 489–510. Verkerk, M. 2001. The care perspective and autonomy. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4: 289–294. Wing, L. 1997. The autistic spectrum. The Lancet 350(9093): 1761–1766.