Definiteness and determinacy

Aguilar-Guevara, A., & Zwarts, J. (2010). Weak definites and reference to kinds. In Proceedings of SALT 20, eLanguage (pp. 179–196)

Barker C. (1995) Possessive descriptions. CSLI Publications, Stanford

Barker, C. (2004). Possessive weak definites. In Y. Kim, Y. Lander, & B. H. Partee (Eds.), Possessives and beyond: Semantics and syntax (pp. 89–113). Amherst: GSLA Publications

Barwise J., Cooper R. (1981) Generalized quantifiers and natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4: 159–219

Beaver, D. (1992). The kinematics of presupposition. In P. Dekker & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighth Amsterdam colloquium (pp. 17–36). Amsterdam: ILLC, University of Amsterdam

Beaver, D. (1994). When variables don’t vary enough. In M. Harvey & L. Santelmann (Eds.), Proceedings of SALT IV (pp. 35–60). Ithaca: Cornell University

Beaver D.I., Clark B.Z. (2008) Sense and sensitivity: How focus determines meaning. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester

Beaver D., Krahmer E. (2001) A partial account of presupposition projection. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 10: 147–182

Beaver, D., & Zeevat, H. (2007). Accommodation. In The Oxford handbook of linguistic interfaces (pp. 503–539). Oxford: Oxford University Press

Carlson, G. N., Sussman, R., Klein, N., & Tannenhaus, M. (2006). Weak definite noun phrases. In C. Davis, A. R. Deal, & Y. Zabal (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS 36 (pp. 179–196). Amherst: GSLA, University of Massachusetts

Chierchia G. (1998) Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics, 6: 339–405

Cooper, R. (1978). Variable binding and relative clauses. In F. Guenthner & S. J. Schmidt (Eds.), Formal semantics and pragmatics for natural languages (pp. 131–170). Dordrecht: Reidel

Cooper, R. (2013). Update conditions and intensionality in a type-theoretic approach to dialogue semantics. In R. Fernández & A. Isard (Eds.), Proceedings of SemDial 2013, University of Amsterdam (pp. 15–24). http://www.illc.uva.nl/semdial/

Coppock, E., & Beaver, D. (2011). Sole sisters. In N. Ashton, A. Chereches, & D. Lutz (Eds.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) 21, eLanguage (pp. 197–217). Newark: Rutgers University

Coppock, E., & Beaver, D. (2012a). Exclusivity, uniqueness, and definiteness. In C. Piñón (Ed.), Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9. Published online at http://www.cssp.cnrs.fr

Coppock, E., & Beaver, D. (2012b). Weak uniqueness: The only difference between definites and indefinites. In A. Chereches (Ed.), Proceedings of semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) 22 (pp. 527–544). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications

Coppock E., Beaver D. (2014) Principles of the exclusive muddle. Journal of Semantics 31(3): 371–432

Dayal V. (2004) Number marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 393–450

Donnellan K.S. (1966) Reference and definite descriptions. The Philosophical Review 75: 281–304

Doron, E. (1983). Verbless predicates in Hebrew. PhD Thesis, University of Texas at Austin

Elbourne P. (2005) Situations and individuals. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

Elbourne P. (2012) Definite descriptions. Clarendon Press, Oxford

Fara, D. G. (2001). Descriptions as predicates. Philosophical Studies, 102, 1–42. (Originally published under the name “Delia Graff”)

Fara D. G. (2015) Names are predicates. Philosophical Review 124(1): 59–117

Frege, G. (1892). [reprinted 1948]). Sense and reference. The Philosophical Review, 57(3), 209–230

Gendler Szabó Z. (2000) Descriptions and uniqueness. Philosophical Studies 101: 29–57

Geurts B. (1999) Presuppositions and pronouns. Elsevier, Oxford

Geurts B., van der Sandt R. (2004) Interpreting focus. Theoretical Linguistics 30(1): 1–44

Glanzberg M. (2007) Definite descriptions and quantifier scope: Some Mates cases reconsidered. European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 3(2): 133–158

Grice, H. P. (1981). Presupposition and conversational implicature. In P. Cole (Ed.), Radical pragmatics (pp. 183–198). New York: Academic Press

Haug, D. (2013). Partial dynamic semantics for anaphora: Compositionality without syntactic coindexation. Journal of Semantics (online first)

Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. PhD Thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst

Heim, I. (1983). On the projection problem for presuppositions. In D. Flickinger, M. Barlow, & M. Westcoat (Eds.), Proceedings of the second West Coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 114–125). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press

Heim, I. (1991). Artikel und Definitheit. In A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (Eds.), Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung (pp. 487–535). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Heim I., Kratzer A. (1998) Semantics in generative grammar. Blackwell, Oxford

Hendriks H (1993). Studied flexibility: Categories and types in syntax and semantics. PhD Thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam

Hoeksema, J. (1988). The semantics of non-boolean and. Journal of Semantics, 6, 19–40

Horn, L., & Abbott, B. (2002). <the, a>: (In)definiteness and implicature. In W. Kabasenche, M. O’Rourke, & M. Slater (Eds.), Reference and referring (pp. 325–355). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press

Isaacs J., Rawlins K. (2008) Conditional questions. Journal of Semantics 25(3): 269–319

Kadmon, N. (1987). On unique and non-unique reference and asymmetric quantification. PhD Thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst

Kamp, H. (2001). The importance of presupposition. In C. Rohrer, A. Roßdeutscher, & H. Kamp (Eds.), Linguistic form and its computation (pp. 207–254). Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications

Kaplan, D. (1977). Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals. In J. P. Almog & H. Wettstein (Eds.), Themes from Kaplan (pp. 267–298). Oxford: Oxford University Press

Karttunen L. (1974) Presuppositions and linguistic context. Theoretical Linguistics 1: 181–194

Karttunen, L. (1976). Discourse referents. In J. D. McCawley (Ed.), Notes from the linguistic underground. Syntax and Semantics (Vol. 7, pp. 363–385). New York: Academic Press

Kripke S.A. (2011) Philosophical troubles: Collected papers. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Landman F. (2004) Indefinites and the type of sets. Blackwell, Malden, MA

Lasersohn P. (1993) Existence presuppositions and background knowledge. Journal of Semantics 10: 113–122

Löbner S. (1985) Definites. Journal of Semantics 4: 279–326

Löbner S. (2011) Concept types and determination. Journal of Semantics 28: 279–333

Mates B. (1973) Descriptions and reference. Foundations of Language 10: 409–418

Matushansky O. (2008) On the linguistic complexity of proper names. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 573–627

McNally, L. (1992). An interpretation for the English existential construction. PhD Thesis, UC Santa Cruz

McNally L. (1998) Existential sentences without existential quantification. Linguistics and Philosophy 21: 353–392

Moltmann F. (1997) Intensional verbs and quantifiers. Natural Language Semantics 5: 1–52

Montague, R. (1974). The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In R. H. Thomason (Ed.), Formal philosophy (pp. 247–270). New Haven: Yale University Press

Muskens R. (1995) Meaning and partiality. CSLI Publications, Stanford, CA

Muskens R. (1996) Combining Montague semantics and discourse representation. Linguistics and Philosophy 19: 143–186

Neale S. (1990) Descriptions. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

Nelson, M. (2012). Existence. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2012/entries/existence/

Oliver A., Smiley T. (2013) Plural logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford

Partee, B. H. (1986). Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In J. Groenendijk, D. de Jongh, & M. Stokhof (Eds.), Studies in discourse representation theory and the theory of generalized quantifiers (pp. 115–143). Dordrecht: Foris

Partee, B., & Borschev, V. (2003). Genitives, relational nouns, and argument-modifier ambiguity. In E. Lang, C. Maienborn, & C. Fabricius-Hansen (Eds.), Modifying adjuncts (pp. 67–112). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter

Percus, O. (2006). Antipresuppositions. In A. Ueyama (Ed.), Theoretical and empirical studies of reference and anaphora: Toward the establishment of generative grammar as an empirical science (pp. 52–73). Tokyo: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Peters S. (1979) A truth-conditional formulation of Karttunen’s account of presupposition. Synthese 40(2): 301–316

Peters S., Westerståhl D. (2013) The semantics of possessives. Language 89(4): 713–759

Poesio, M. (1994). Weak definites. In M. Harvey & L. Santelmann (Eds.), Proceedings of the fourth conference on semantics and linguistic theory. Ithaca: CLC Publications

Rawlins, K. (2005). Possessive definites and the definite article. UCSC Qualifying Paper

Rawlins, K. (2006). Possessive antecedents to donkey pronouns. In D. Baumer, D. Montero, & M. Scanlon (Eds.), Proceedings of the 25th West Coast conference on formal linguistics (pp. 337–345). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press

Reinhart T. (1997) Quantifier scope: How labor is divided between QR and choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy 20: 335–397

Roberts C. (1989) Modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 683–721

Roberts, C. (1996). Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. In J. H. Yoon & A. Kathol (Eds.), OSU Working Papers in Linguistics 49: Papers in Semantics (pp. 91–136). Columbus: The Ohio State University

Russell B. (1905) On denoting. Mind 14: 479–493

Schlenker P. (2012) Maximize Presupposition and Gricean reasoning. Natural Language Semantics 20(4): 391–429

Schoubye A.J. (2009) Descriptions, truth value intuitions, and questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 32(6): 583–617

Schoubye, A. J. (2014). Type-ambiguous names. Ms., University of Edinburgh

Schwarz, F. (2012). How weak and how definite are weak definites? Ms., University of Pennsylvania

Stalnaker, R. (1978). Assertion. In P. Cole (Ed.), Syntax and semantics (Vol. 9, pp. 315–332). New York: Academic Press

Strawson P.F. (1950) On referring. Mind 59(235): 320–344

Strawson P. (1964) Identifying reference and truth-values. Theoria 30(2): 96–118

Thomason, R. (1990). Accommodation, meaning, and implicature: Interdisciplinary foundations for pragmatics. In P. Cohen, J. Morgan, & M. Pollack (Eds.), Intentions in communication (pp. 326–363). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

van der Sandt R.A. (1992) Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution. Journal of Semantics 9: 333–377

Vikner C., Jensen P.A. (2002) A semantic analysis of the English genitive: Interaction of lexical and formal semantics. Studia Linguistica 56: 191–226

von Fintel, K. (2004). Would you believe it? The king of France is back! (Presuppositions and truth-value intuitions). In A. Bezuidenhout & M. Reimer (Eds.), Descriptions and beyond (pp. 315–342). Oxford: Oxford University Press

von Heusinger K. (1997) Definite descriptions and choice functions. Logic, Language and Computation 5: 61–91

Wang, L., & McCready, E. (2005). Testing predicative definite descriptions. Ms., National Chung Cheng University and Osaka University

Winter Y. (2001) Flexibility principles in Boolean semantics. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

Zimmermann T.E. (1993) On the proper treatment of opacity in certain verbs. Natural Language Semantics 1(2): 149–179