A prospective study on the clinical effectiveness of the stainless steel crown Herbst appliance

Progress in Orthodontics - Tập 13 - Trang 100-108 - 2012
Dalia Latkauskiene1, Gundega Jakobsone2, James A. McNamara3
1Department of Orthodontics, Lithuanian Unversity of Health Sciences, Lithuania
2Assistant Professor Department of Orthodontics, Riga Stradins University, Latvia
3Thomas M. and Doris Graber Endowed Professor of Dentistry, Department of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry; and Research Professor, Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Cozza, 2006, Mandibular changes produced by functional appliances in Class II malocclusion: A systematic review, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 129, 599.e1, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.11.010 Aelbers, 1996, Orthopedics in orthodontcs: Part I, fiction or reality, a review of the literature, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 110, 513, 10.1016/S0889-5406(96)70058-6 Pancherz, 1982, The mechanism of Class II correction in Herbst appliance treatment: a cephalometric investigation, Am J Orthod, 82, 104, 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90489-4 Sanden, 2004, Complications during Herbst treatment, J Clin Orthod, 38, 130 Schioth, 2007, Complications during Herbst appliance treatment with reduced mandibular casted splints. A prospective, clinical multicenter study, J Orofac Orthop, 68, 302, 10.1007/s00056-007-0703-4 Langford, 1980, The Herbst appliance, J Clin Othod, 15, 58 Howe, 1983, Clinical management of the bonded Herbst appliance, J Clin Orthod, 17, 456 Wieslander, 1984, Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the “early” mixed dentition, Am J Orthod, 86, 1, 10.1016/0002-9416(84)90271-9 Valant, 1989, Treatment effects of the Herbst appliance, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 95, 138, 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90392-2 Burkhardt, 2003, Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: A cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 123, 108, 10.1067/mod.2003.7 Barnett, 2008, Immediate Skeletal and Dentoalveolar effects of the crown- or banded type Herbst appliance on Class II division 1 malocclusion, Angle Orthod, 78, 361, 10.2319/031107-123.1 Schaefer, 2004, A cephalometric comparison of treatment with the twin-block and stainless steel crown Herbst appliances followed by fixed appliance therapy, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 126, 7, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.06.017 O’Brien, 2003, Effectiveness of treatment for Class II malocclusion with the Herbst or Twin-Block appliances: a randomized, controlled trial, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 124, 128, 10.1016/S0889-5406(03)00345-7 Harradine, 2000, The effects of torque control spurs in twin-block appliances, Clin Orthod Res, 3, 202, 10.1034/j.1600-0544.2000.030406.x Baton, 1997, Predicting functional appliance treatment outcome in Class II malocclusions- a review, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 112, 282, 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70257-9 Tulloch, 1997, Influences on the outcome of early treatment for Class II malocclusion, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 111, 533, 10.1016/S0889-5406(97)70290-7 Casutt, 2007, Success rate and efficiency of activator treatment, Eur J Orthod, 29, 614, 10.1093/ejo/cjm066 Pancherz, 1986, Occlusal changes during and after Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation, Eur J Orthod, 8, 215, 10.1093/ejo/8.4.215 Tulloch, 2004, Outcomes in a 2-phase clinical trial of early Class II treatment, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 125, 657, 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.008 Bondevik, 1991, How effective is the combined activator-headgear treatment?, Eur J Orthod, 13, 482, 10.1093/ejo/13.6.482 Pancherz, 1988, Mandibular anchorage in Herbst treatment, Eur J Orthod, 10, 149, 10.1093/ejo/10.1.149 Weschler, 2005, Efficiency of three mandibular anchorage forms in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric investigation, Angle Orthod, 75, 23 Pancherz, 1997, The modern Herbst appliance, 336 Du Xi, 2002, Effects of headgear Herbst and mandibular step-by-step advancement versus conventional Herbst appliance and maximum jumping of the mandible, Eur J Orthod, 24, 167, 10.1093/ejo/24.2.167 Hagg, 2002, Initial and late treatment effects of headgear- Herbst appliance with mandibular step-by-step advancement, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 122, 477, 10.1067/mod.2002.128218 Austin, 2010, A protocol for improved stability with Herbst appliance treatment for adults, Prog Orthod, 11, 151, 10.1016/j.pio.2010.09.009 Pancherz, 1991, The nature of Class II relapse after Herbst treatment: A cephalometric long term investigation, Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 100, 220, 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70059-6 Pancherz, 2008, The Herbst appliance, research based clinical management, Quintessence publishing, 258 Solow, 1980, The dentoalveolar compensatory mechanism: background and clinical implications, Br J Orthod, 7, 145, 10.1179/bjo.7.3.145