Interrelation between patenting and standardisation strategies: empirical evidence and policy implications

Antonelli, 1994, Localized technological change and the evolution of standards as economic institutions, Information Economics and Policy, 6, 195, 10.1016/0167-6245(94)90002-7 Arundel, 2001, The relative effectiveness of patents and secrecy for appropriation, Research Policy, 30, 611, 10.1016/S0048-7333(00)00100-1 Arundel, 1995 Bekkers, 2002, Intellectual property rights, strategic technology agreements and market structure: the case of GSM, Research Policy, 31, 1141, 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00189-5 Blind, 2002, Driving forces for standardisation at standardisation development organisations, Applied Economics, 34, 1985, 10.1080/00036840110111158 Blind, 2004 Blind, 2004, Intellectual property protection and standardization, International Journal of IT Standards & Standardization Research, 2, 61, 10.4018/jitsr.2004070105 Blind, K., Bierhals, R., Iversen, E., Hossain, K., Rixius, B., Thumm, N., van Reekum, R., 2004. Interaction between Standardisation and Intellectual Property Rights. European Commission Technical Report EUR 21074 EN, Seville. Blum, 2000 Carlsson, 1999, On the nature, function and composition of technological systems, 488 Cassiman, 2002, R&D cooperation and spillovers: some empirical evidence from Belgium, American Economic Review, 92, 1169, 10.1257/00028280260344704 Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R., Walsh, J.P., 2000. Protecting their intellectual assets: appropriability conditions and why U.S. manufacturing firms patent (or not). NBER Working Paper 7552, Cambridge, MA. Cohen, 2002, R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to innovate in Japan and the United States, Research Policy, 31, 1349, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00068-9 Deardorff, 1992, Welfare effects of global patent protection, Economica, 59, 35, 10.2307/2555064 Farrell, 1989, Standardization and intellectual property, Jurimetrics Journal, 35 Farrell, 1998, The effects of Antitrust and intellectual property law on compatibility and innovation, The Antitrust Bulletin Fall-Winter, 609, 10.1177/0003603X9804303-403 Farrell, 1985, Standardization, compatibility, and innovation, RAND Journal of Economics, 16, 70, 10.2307/2555589 Geroski, 1995, Markets for technology: knowledge, innovation and appropriability Good, 1992 Grandstrand, 1999 Hall, 2001, The patent paradox revisited: an empirical analysis of patenting in the US semiconductor industry 1979–1995, RAND Journal of Economics, 32, 101, 10.2307/2696400 Harabi, 1995, Appropriability of technical innovations: an empirical analysis, Research Policy, 24, 981, 10.1016/0048-7333(94)00812-4 Harhoff, 2003, Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights, Research Policy, 32, 1343, 10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00124-5 Heller, 1998, Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research, Science, 280, 698, 10.1126/science.280.5364.698 Iversen, 1999, Standardization and intellectual property rights: conflicts between innovation and diffusion in new telecommunications systems, 80 Janz, N., Licht, G., Doherr, T., 2001. Innovation Activities and European Patenting of German Firms – A Panel Data Analysis. ZEW Working Paper, Mannheim. Jungmittag, 1999, Innovation, standardization and the long-term production function: a co-integration approach for Germany 1960–1996, Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, 119, 205 Katz, 1985, Network externalities, competition, and compatibility, American Economic Review, 75, 424 Kristiansen, 1998, R&D in the presence of network externalities: timing and compatibility, RAND Journal of Economics, 29, 531, 10.2307/2556103 Kortum, 1999, What is behind the recent surge in patenting?, Research Policy, 28, 1, 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00082-1 Love, 1999, The determinants of innovation: R&D, technology transfer and networking effects, Review of Industrial Organization, 15, 43, 10.1023/A:1007757110963 Mazzoleni, 1998, The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate, Research Policy, 27, 273, 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00048-1 Meeus, M.T.H., Faber, J., Oerlemans, L.A.G., 2002. Why do firms participate in standardization? An empirical exploration of the relation between isomorphism and institutional dynamics in standardization. Working Paper Department of Innovation Studies. University of Utrecht, Utrecht. Merges, R.P., 1999. Institutions for Intellectual Property Transactions: The Case of Patent Pools. Working Paper Revision 1999. University of California at Berkely. Ordover, 1991, A patent system for both diffusion and exclusion, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 43, 10.1257/jep.5.1.43 Rammer, C., 2002. Patente und Marken als Schutzmechanismen für Innovationen. Studien zum deutschen Innovationssystem Nr. 11-2003, Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung (ZEW), Mannheim. Rapp, R.T., Stiroh, L.J., 2002. Standard setting and market power, contribution to the public hearing on competition and intellectual property law and policy in the knowledge-based economy in 2001 and 2002. http://www.ftc.gov/opp/intellect/index.htm; (3-07-2002). Salop, 1983, Raising rivals’ costs, American Economic Review, 73, 267 Salop, 1987, Cost-raising strategies, Journal of Industrial Economics, 36, 19, 10.2307/2098594 1990 Shapiro, 2001, Navigating the patent thicket: cross licenses, patent pools and standard setting, vol. 1, 119 Shapiro, 1999 Swann, P., 2000. The Economics of Standardization. Final Report for Standards and Technical Regulations. Directorate Department of Trade and Industry, University of Manchester, Manchester. Thumm, 2000 Thumm, 2001, Management of intellectual property rights in European biotechnology firms, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 67, 259, 10.1016/S0040-1625(00)00099-8 van Wegberg, 2004, Intellectual property rights and competitively fragmented standardization processes: a review of the literature, 214 Wakelin, 1998, Innovation and export behaviour at the firm level, Research Policy, 26, 829, 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00051-6 Windrum, 2004, Leveraging technological externalities in complex technologies: Microsoft's exploitation of standards in browser wars, Research Policy, 33, 385, 10.1016/j.respol.2003.09.002