Change Point Analysis of Exchange Rates Using Bootstrapping Methods: An Application to the Indonesian Rupiah 2000–2008

Springer Science and Business Media LLC - Tập 22 - Trang 429-444 - 2015
Amirullah Setya Hardi1, Ken-ichi Kawai2, Sangyeol Lee3, Koichi Maekawa4
1Graduate School Hiroshima University of Economics, Asaminami, Japan
2Department of International Business Management, Beppu University, Beppu, Japan
3Department of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
4Hiroshima University of Economics, Asaminami, Japan

Tóm tắt

In this paper, we investigate detecting single change point under time series regression model with GARCH errors using the cumulative sum of squares of the least squares residuals test and the log-likelihood ratio test. Furthermore we think it is important to calculate confidence interval for an estimated change point, for which we need to know the sampling distribution of the estimated change point. We obtain the sampling distribution to calculate confidence interval using Monte Carlo simulation based on a circular block bootstrap method and verify the performance of the above break point tests by Monte Carlo experiment. Then we detect a change point in the exchange rate of Indonesian Rupiah (IDR) using the above test to detect. The Government of Indonesia officially announced (de jure) to adopt a floating exchange rate regime in August 1997. However, from time to time, Bank Indonesia nevertheless maintains the stability of rupiah value in the market. Since there is no official information regarding on central bank’s intervention in the foreign exchange market, therefore detecting a structural change in the time series of the exchange market can be used as an indicator of exchange rate management. Our real data analysis shows that the IDR had been moving with the USD since 2000, but that the direction of the relationship changed in March 2002. This indicates that there was some control over the Rupiah’s movement.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bai, J. (1997). Estimating multiple breaks one at a time. Econometric Theory, 13(3), 315–352. Bank Indonesia. (1998). Annual report 1997/1998. Jakarta. Bayoumia, Tamim, & Eichengreen, Barry. (1998). Exchange rate volatility and intervention: Implications of the theory of optimum currency areas. Journal of International Economics, 45, 191–209. Calvo, G., & Reinhart, C. M. (2002). Fear of floating. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(2), 379–408. Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap methods: Another look at the jackknife. The Annals of Statistics, 7(1), 1–26. Esaka, T. (2007). De facto exchange rate regimes in Emerging Market Countries, 1990–2001: Some empirical evidence. In H. Mitsuo (Ed.), New developments of the exchange rate regimes in developing countries. Institute of Developing Economies (IDE), JETRO. Frankel, J. A. (1999). No single currency regime is right for all countries or at all times. Princeton University, International Finance Section, Essays in International Finance, No. 215 (August). Frankel, J. A., & Wei, S.-J. (2008). Estimation of de facto exchange rate regimes: Synthesis of the techniques for inferring flexibility and basket weights. Working paper NBER, 14016. Ghosh, Atish, Gulde, Anne-Marie, & Wolf, Holger. (2002). Exchange rate regimes: Choices and consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Hušková, M., & Kirch, C. (2013). Bootstrapping confidence intervals for the change point of time series. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 29, 947–972.arXiv:0706.1484v1 [math.ST]. Accessed on January 13, 2014. Lahiri, S. N. (1999). Theoretical comparisons of block bootstrap methods. The Annals of Statistics, 27(1), 386–404. Lahiri, S. N. (2003). Selecting optimal block lengths for block bootstrap methods. In Proceedings of the 35th Symposium of the Interface. Salt lake city. Odano, S. (1986). Exchange market pressure in Indonesia: An application of the Girton Ropper monetary model. Bulletin of Graduate School of International Relation IUJ, No. 5 (July). Politis, D. N., & Romano, J. P. (1991). A circular block resampling procedure for stationary data. Technical Report No. 370, Department of Statistics Stanford University.