A without-prejudice list of generic names of fungi for protection under the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants

IMA Fungus - Tập 4 - Trang 381-443 - 2013
Paul M. Kirk1, Joost A. Stalpers2, Uwe Braun3, Pedro W. Crous2, Karen Hansen4, David L. Hawksworth1,5,6, Kevin D. Hyde7, Robert Lücking8, Thorsten H. Lumbsch8, Amy Y. Rossman9, Keith A. Seifert10, Mark Stadler11
1Mycology Section, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Surrey, UK
2CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht, The Netherlands
3Institut für Biologie, Bereich Geobotanik und Botanischer Garten, Herbarium, Martin-Luther-Universität, Halle (Saale), Germany
4Department of Botany, Swedish Museum of Natural History (S), Stockholm, Sweden
5Departamento de Biología Vegetal II, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
6Department of Life Sciences, The Natural History Museum, London, UK
7Institute of Excellence in Fungal Research, and School of Science, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand
8Science & Education, The Field Museum, Chicago, USA
9Systematic Mycology & Microbiology Laboratory, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, USA
10Biodiversity (Mycology), Agriculture & Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Canada
11Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research GmbH, Dept. Microbial Drugs, Braunschweig, Germany

Tóm tắt

As a first step towards the production of a List of Protected Generic Names for Fungi, a without-prejudice list is presented here as a basis for future discussion and the production of a List for formal adoption. We include 6995 generic names out of the 17072 validly published names proposed for fungi and invite comments from all interested mycologists by 31 March 2014. The selection of names for inclusion takes note of recent major publications on different groups of fungi, and further the decisions reached so far by international working groups concerned with particular families or genera. Changes will be sought in the Code to provide for this and lists at other ranks to be protected against any competing unlisted names, and to permit the inclusion of names of lichen-forming fungi. A revised draft will be made available for further discussion at the 10th International Mycological Congress in Bangkok in August 2014. A schedule is suggested for the steps needed to produce a list for adoption by the International Botanical Congress in August 2017. This initiative provides mycologists with an opportunity to place nomenclature at the generic level on a more secure and stable base.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Anon. (2013) Progress on preparing Lists of Protected Names. IMA Fungus 4: 3–4. Berendsohn WG, Greuter W (1997) Names in Current Use for Extant Plant Genera, database edition. Berlin: International Association for Plant Taxonomy. Braun U, Nakashima C, Crous PW (2013) Cercosporoid fungi (Mycosphaerellaceae) 1. Species on other fungi, Pteridophyta and Gymnospermae. IMA Fungus 4: 265–346. Clements FE, Shear CL (1931) The Genera of Fungi. New York: H.W. Wilson. Gams W, Baral H-O, Jaklitsch WM, Kirschner R, Stadler M (2012a) Clarifications needed concerning the new Article 59 dealing with pleomorphic fungi. IMA Fungus 3: 175–177. Gams W, Humber RA, Jaklitsch WM, Kirschner R, Stadler M (2012b) Minimizing the chaos following the loss of Article 59: suggestions for a discussion. Mycotaxon 119: 495–507. Greuter W, Barrie FR, Burdet HM, Chaloner WG, Demoulin V, Hawksworth DL, Jørgensen PM, Nicolson DH, Silva PC, Trehane P, McNeill J (eds) (1994) International Code of Botanical Nomenclature(Tokyo Code) adopted by the Fifteenth International Botanical Congress, Yokohama, August-September 1993. [Regnum Vegetabile No. 131.] Konigstein: Koeltz Scientific Books. Greuter W, Brummitt RK, Farr E, Kilian N, Kirk PM, Silva PC (1993) NCU-3: Names in current use for extant plant genera [Regnum Vegetabile No. 129.] Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books. Hawksworth DL (2013) Managing and coping with names of pleomorphic fungi in a period of transition. Mycosphere 3: 143–155; IMA Fungus 3: 15–24. Hyde KD, Jones EBG, Liu J-K, Ariyawansha H, Boehm E [and 61 others] (2013) Families of Dothideomycetes. Fungal Diversity 63: 1–313. Hyde KD, McKenzie EHC, KoKo TW (2011) Towards incorporating anamorphic fungi in a natural classification - checklist and notes for 2010. Mycosphere 2: 1–88. Kendrick B, DiCosmo F (1979) Teleomorph-anamorph connections in ascomycetes. In: The Whole Fungus: the sexual-asexual synthesis (Kendrick B, ed.) 1: 283–410. Ottawa: National Museum of Natural Sciences. Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA (2008) Ainsworth & Bisby’s Dictionary of the Fungi. 10th edn. Wallingford: CAB International. Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T (eds) (2011) The Yeasts: a taxonomic study. 5th edn. 3 vols. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Lumbsch TH, Huhndorf SM (2010) Myconet Volume 14. Part One. Outline of Ascomycota - 2009. Fieldiana, Life and Earth Sciences 14: 1–42. McNeill J, Barrie FR, Buck WR, Demoulin V, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, Herendeen PS, Knapp S, Marhold K, Prado J, Prud’homme van Reine WF, Smith GE, Wiersema JH, Turland NJ (eds) (2012) International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code) adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011. [Regnum Vegetabile No. 154.] Königstein: Koeltz Scientific Books. Rossman AY, Seifert KA, Samuels GJ, Minnis AM, Schroers H-J. [and 11 others] (2013) Genera in Bionectriaceae, Hypocreaceae, and Nectriaceae (Hypocreales) proposed for acceptance or rejection. IMA Fungus 4: 41–51. Seifert K, Morgan-Jones G, Gams W, Kendrick B (2011) The Genera of Hyphomycetes. [CBS Biodiversity Series no. 9.] Utrecht: CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre. Stadler M, Kuhnert E, Peršoh D, Fournier J (2013) The Xylariaceae as model example for a unified nomenclature following the “One Fungus-One Name” (1F1N) concept. Mycology 4: 5–21. Stalpers JA (2013) The road to stability. IMA Fungus 4: (19).