Substance abuse treatment for women: Changes in the settings where women received treatment and types of services provided, 1987–1998
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Reed BG. Developing women-sensitive drug dependence treatment services: why so difficult?Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 1987;19(2):151–164.
Kandel DB. Gender differences in the epidemiology of substance dependence in the United States. In: Frank E, ed.Gender and its Effects on Psychopathology. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press; 2000:231–252.
Mahan S.Crack, Cocaine, Crime, and Women: Legal, Social, and Treatment Issues. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1996.
Breitbart V, Chavkin W, Wise PH. The accessibility of drug treatment for pregnant women: a survey of programs in five cities.American Journal of Public Health. 1994;84(10):1658–1661.
Schmidt L, Weisner C. The emergence of problem-drinking women as a special population in need of treatment. In: Galanter M, ed.Recent Developments in Alcoholism: Alcoholism and Women. New York: Plenum; 1995:309–334.
Chavkin W, Breitbart V, Elman D, et al. National survey of the states: policies and practices regarding drug-using pregnant women.American Journal of Public Health. 1998;88(1):117–119.
General Accounting Office.Drug Exposed Infants: A Generation at Risk. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office; 1990. Report No. (GAO/HRD)90-138.
Center for Substance Abuse Treatment.Telling Their Stories: Reflections of the 11 Original Grantees That Piloted Residential Treatment for Women and Children for CSAT. Rockville, Md: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration; 2001. SAMHSA Publication No. (SMA)01-3529).
Eisen M, Keyser-Smith J, Dampeer J, et al. Evaluation of substance use outcomes in demonstration projects for pregnant and postpartum women and their infants: findings from a quasi-experiment.Addictive Behavior. 2000;25(1):123–129.
Nunes-Dinis M. Drug and alcohol misuse: treatment outcomes and services for women. In: Barth RP, Pietrzak P, Ramler M, eds.Families Living With Drugs and HIV: Intervention & Treatment. New York: Guilford Press; 1993:144–176.
Rahdert ER, ed.Treatment for Drug-exposed Women and Their Children: Advances in Research Methodology. Rockville, Md: US Dept Health & Human Services, National Institutes of Health; 1996. NIDA Research Monograph, No. 165.
Blumenthal SJ. Women and substance abuse: a new national focus. In: Wetherington CL, Roman AB, eds.Drug Addiction Research and the Health of Women. Rockville, Md: US Dept of Health & Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse; 1998:197–222.
Kissin WB, Svikis DS, Morgan GD, et al. Characterizing pregnant drug-dependent women in treatment and their children.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2001;21:27–34.
Haller DL, Knisely JS, Dawson KS, et al. Perinatal substance abusers: psychological and social characteristics.Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 1993;181:509–513.
Comfort M, Kaltenbach KA. Predictors of treatment outcomes for substance abusing women: a retrospective study.Substance Abuse. 2000;21(1):33–45.
Howell EM, Chasnoff IJ. Perinatal substance abuse treatment: findings from focus groups with clients and providers.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1999;17:139–148.
Brown VB, Sanchez S, Zweben JE, et al. Challenges in moving from a traditional therapeutic community to a women and children's TC model.Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 1996;28(1):39–46.
Hodgins DC, el-Guebaly N, Addington J. Treatment of substance abusers: single or mixed gender programs?Addiction. 1997;92(7):805–812.
Stevens SJ, Arbiter N. A therapeutic community for substance-abusing pregnant women and women with children: process and outcome.Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 1995;27(1):49–56.
Dahlgren L, Willander A. Are special treatment facilities for female alcoholics needed? A controlled 2-year follow-up study from a specialized female unit (EWA) versus a mixed male/female treatment facility.Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 1989;13(4):499–504.
Jessup MA, Humphreys JC, Brindis CD, et al. Extrinsic barriers to substance abuse treatment among pregnant drug dependent women.Journal of Drug Issues. 2003;33(2):285–304.
Luthar SS, Walsh KG. Treatment needs of drug-addicted mothers: integrated parenting psychotherapy interventions.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1995;12:341–348.
Bloom B, Owen B, Covington S.Gender-responsive strategies: Research, Practice, and Guiding Principles for Women Offenders. Washington, DC: National Institute of Corrections, US Dept of Justice; 2003.
Grella CE, Polinsky M, Hser YI, et al. Characteristics of women-only and mixed-gender drug abuse treatment programs.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1999;17(1/2):37–44.
Uziel-Miller ND, Lyons SS. Specialized substance treatment for women and their children: an analysis of program design.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2000;19:355–367.
Copeland J, Hall W, Didcott P, et al. A comparison of a specialist women's alcohol and other drug treatment service with two traditional mixed-sex services: client characteristics and treatment outcome.Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1993;32(1):81–92.
Reed BG, Leibson E. Women clients in special women's demonstration drug abuse treatment programs compared with women entering selected co-sex programs.International Journal of the Addictions. 1981;16(8):1425–1466.
Grella CE. Women in residential drug treatment: differences by program type and pregnancy.Journal of Health Care for the Poor & Underserved. 1999;10(2):216–229.
Grella CE, Joshi V, Hser YI. Program variation in treatment outcomes among women in residential drug treatment.Evaluation Review. 2000;24(4):364–383.
Szuster RR, Rich LL, Chung A, et al. Treatment retention in women's residential chemical dependency treatment: the effect of admission with children.Substance Use & Misuse. 1996;31:1001–1013.
Hughes PH, Coletti SD, Neri RL, et al. Retaining cocaine abusing women in a therapeutic community: the effect of a child live-in program.American Journal of Public Health. 1995;85:1149–1152.
Stevens SJ, Patton T. Residential treatment for drug addicted women and their children: effective treatment strategies.Drugs & Society. 1998;13(1/2):235–249.
Wobie K, Eyler FD, Conlon M, et al. Women and children in residential treatment: outcomes for mothers and their infants.Journal of Drug Issues. 1997;27(3):585–606.
Zlotnick C, Franchino K, St Claire N, et al. The impact of outpatient drug services on abstinence among pregnant and parenting women.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1996;13(3):195–202.
Volpicelli JR, Markman I, Monterosso J, et al. Psychosocially enhanced treatment for cocaine-dependent mothers: evidence of efficacy.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2000;18(1):41–49.
Wingfield K, Klempner T. What works in women-oriented treatment for substance abusing mothers. In: Kluger MP, Alexander G, eds.What Works in Child Welfare. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America Inc; 2000:113–124.
Brindis CD, Berkowitz G, Clayson Z, et al. California's approach to perinatal substance abuse: toward a model of comprehensive care.Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 1997;29(1):113–122.
Howell EM, Heiser N, Harrington M. A review of recent findings on substance abuse treatment for pregnant women.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1999;16(3):195–219.
Lanehart RE, Clark HB, Rollings JP, et al. The impact of intensive case-managed intervention on substance-using pregnant and postpartum women.Journal of Substance Abuse. 1996;8(4):487–495.
Strantz IH, Welch SP. Postpartum women in outpatient drug abuse treatment: correlates of retention/completion.Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 1995;27(4):357–373.
Weisdorf T, Parran TV, Graham A, et al. Comparison of pregnancy-specific interventions to a traditional treatment program for cocaine-addicted pregnant women.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1999;16:39–45.
Camp JM, Finkelstein N. Parenting training for women in residential substance abuse treatment: results of a demonstration project.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1997;14(5):411–422.
Sanders LM, Trinh C, Sherman BR. Assessment of client satisfaction in a peer counseling substance abuse treatment program for pregnant and postpartum women.Evaluation and Program Planning. 1998;21:287–296.
Smith BD, Marsh JC. Client-service matching in substance abuse treatment for women with children.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2002;22(3):161–168.
Marsh JC, D'Aunno TA, Smith BD. Increasing access and providing social services to improve drug abuse treatment for women with children.Addiction. 2000;95(8):1237–1247.
Orwin R, Francisco L, Bernichon T.Effectiveness of Women's Substance Abuse Treatment Programs: A Meta-analysis. Fairfax, Va: Caliber Associates; 2001. NEDS Analytic Summary Series No 21.
Ashley OS, Marsden ME, Brady TM. Effectiveness of substance abuse treatment programming for women: a review.American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 2003;29(1):19–53.
General Accounting Office.ADMS Block Grant: Women's Set-aside Does Not Assure Drug Treatment for Pregnant Women. Washington, DC: US General Accounting Office; 1991. Report No. (GAO-T-HRD)91-37.
Chavkin W, Breitbart V. Substance abuse and maternity: the United States as a case study.Addiction. 1997;92(9):1201–1205.
Chavkin W, Wise P, Elman D. Policies towards pregnancy and addiction: sticks without carrots. In: Harvey JA, Kosofsky BE, eds.Cocaine: Effects on the Developing Brain. New York: New York Academy of Sciences; 1998;335–340.
Drug Strategies.Keeping Score. Women and Drugs: Looking at the Federal Drug Control Budget. Washington, DC: Drug Strategies; 1998.
Shepard DS, Larson MJ, Hoffmann NG. Cost-effectiveness of substance abuse services: implications for public policy.Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 1999;22(2):385–400.
Weisner C, McCarty D, Schmidt L. New directions in alcohol and drug treatment under managed care.American Journal of Managed Care. 1999;5:57–69.
Blanch AK, Levin BL. Organization and services delivery. In: Levin BL, Blanch AK, Jennings A, eds.Women's Mental Health Services: A Public Health Perspective. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 1998:5–18.
Schreter RK. Ten trends in managed care and their impact on the biopsychosocial model.Hospital & Community Psychiatry. 1993;44(4):325–327.
Reed BG, Mowbray CT. Mental illness and substance abuse: implications for women's health and health care access.Journal of American Medical Women's Association. 1999;54(2):71–78.
Bloom B, Owen B, Covington S. Women offenders and the gendered effects of public policy.Review of Policy Research. 2004;21(1):31–48.
Marquart JW, Brewer VE, Mullings J, et al. The implications of crime control policy on HIV/AIDS-related risk among women prisoners.Crime & Delinquency. 1999;45(1):82–98.
Bureau of Justice Statistics. Prison statistics, summary findings on December 31, 2002. 2002. Available at: http://www.ojp. usdoj.gov/bjs/prisons.htm/. Accessed February 5, 2004.
Mauer M, Potler C, Wolf R.Gender and Justice: Women, Drugs, and Sentencing Policy. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project; 1999.
General Accounting Office.Women in Prison: Issues and Challenges Confronting US Correctional Systems. Washington DC: Government Printing Office; 1999. Report No. (GAO/GGD)00 22.
Jordan BK, Federman EB, Burns, BJ, et al. Lifetime use of mental health and substance abuse treatment services by incarcerated women felons.Psychiatric Services. 2002;53(3):317–325.
Teplin LA, Abram KM, McClelland GM. prevalence of psychiatric disorders among incarcerated women: pretrial jail detainees.Archives of General Psychiatry. 1996;53(6):505–512.
Office of Applied Studies.Uniform Facility Data Set (UFDS): 1998. Data on Substance Abuse Treatment Facilities. Rockville, Md: Department of Health & Human Services, Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration; 2000.
Etheridge RM, Hubbard RL, Anderson J, et al. Treatment structure and program services in the drug abuse treatment outcome study (DATOS).Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 1997;11(4):244–260.
Gerstein DR, Harwood HJ, eds.Treating Drug Problems. Vol 1. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1990.
Office of Applied Studies, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration.The DASIS Report: Women in Substance Abuse Treatment. Rockville, Md: US Dept of Health & Human Services; 2001.
Office of Applied Studies.Uniform Facility Data Set (UFDS): Data for 1996 and 1980–1996. Rockville, Md: Dept of Health & Human Services, Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration; 1997.
Svikis DS, Golden AS, Huggins GR, et al. Cost-effectiveness of treatment for drug-abusing pregnant women.Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 1997;45:105–113.
Daley M, Argeriou M, McCarty D, et al. The costs of crime and the benefits of substance abuse treatment for pregnant women.Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2000;19:445–458.
French MT, McCollister KE, Cacciola J, et al. Benefit-cost analysis of addiction treatment in Arkansas: specialty and standard residential programs for pregnant and parenting women.Substance Abuse. 2002;23(1):31–51.
Clark HW. Residential substance abuse treatment for pregnant and postpartum women and their children: treatment and policy implications.Child Welfare. 2001;80(2):179–198.
Mumola CJ.Substance Abuse and Treatment, State and Federal Prisoners, 1997. Washington, DC: US Dept of Justice, Office of Justice Programs; 1999. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report No. (NCJ)172871.
Prendergast ML, Wellisch J, Wong MM. Residential treatment for women parolees following prison based drug treatment: treatment experiences, needs and services, outcomes.The Prison Journal. 1996;76(3):253–274.
Prendergast ML, Wellisch J, Falkin GP. Assessment of and services for substance abusing women offenders in community and correctional settings.The Prison Journal. 1995;75:240–256.
Alemagno SA. Women in jail: is substance abuse treatment enough?American Journal of Public Health. 2001;91(5):798–800.
Haywood TW, Kravitz HM, Goldman LB, et al. Characteristics of women in jail and treatment orientations: a review.Behavior Modification. 2000;24(3):307–324.
Koons BA, Burrow JD, Morash M, et al. Expert and offender perceptions of program elements linked to successful outcomes for incarcerated women.Crime & Delinquency. 1997;43(4):512–532.
Reed BG, Leavitt ME. Modified wraparound and women offenders in community corrections: strategies, opportunities, and tensions. In: McMahon M, ed.Assessment to Assistance: Programs for Women in Community Corrections. Lanham, Md: American Correctional Association; 2000:1–106.
Hall EA, Baldwin DM, Prendergast ML. Women on parole: barriers to success after substance abuse treatment.Human Organization. 2001;60(3):225–233.
Sandmaier M.The Invisible Alcoholics: Women and Alcohol Abuse in America. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1980.
Beckman LJ, Kocel KM. The treatment-delivery system and alcohol abuse in women: social policy implications.Journal of Social Issues. 1982;38(2):139–151.
Office of Applied Studies.The DASIS Report: Pregnant Women in Substance Abuse Treatment. Rockville, Md: US Dept of Health & Human Services, Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration; 2002.