A single 24 h recall overestimates exclusive breastfeeding practices among infants aged less than six months in rural Ethiopia

International Breastfeeding Journal - Tập 12 - Trang 1-7 - 2017
Esete Habtemariam Fenta1, Robel Yirgu1, Bilal Shikur1, Seifu Hagos Gebreyesus1
1Department of Reproductive Health and Health Service Management, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

Tóm tắt

Exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) to six months is one of the World Health Organization’s (WHOs) infant and young child feeding (IYCF) core indicators. Single 24 h recall method is currently in use to measure exclusive breastfeeding practice among children of age less than six months. This approach overestimates the prevalence of EBF, especially among small population groups. This justifies the need to look for alternative measurement techniques to have a valid estimate regardless of population characteristics. The study involved 422 infants of age less than six months, living in Gurage zone, Southern Ethiopia. The study was conducted from January to February 2016. Child feeding practices were measured for seven consecutive days using 24 h recall method. Recall since birth, was used to measure breastfeeding practices from birth to the day of data collection. Data on EBF obtained by using single 24 h recall were compared with seven days repeated 24 h recall method. McNemar’s test was done to assess if a significant difference existed in rates of EBF between measurement methods. The mean age of infants in months was 3 (SD −1.43). Exclusive breastfeeding prevalence was highest (76.7%; 95% CI 72.6, 80.8) when EBF was estimated using single 24 h recall. The prevalence of EBF based on seven repeated 24 h recall was 53.2% (95% CI: 48.3, 58.0). The estimated prevalence of EBF since birth based on retrospective data (recall since birth) was 50.2% (95% CI 45.4, 55.1). Compared to the EBF estimates obtained from seven repeated 24 h recall, single 24 h recall overestimated EBF magnitude by 23 percentage points (95% CI 19.2, 27.8). As the number of days of 24 h recall increased, a significant decrease in overestimation of EBF was observed. A significant overestimation was observed when single 24 h recall was used to estimate prevalence of EBF compared to seven days of 24 h recall. By increasing the observation days we can significantly decrease the degree of overestimation. Recall since birth presented estimates of EBF that is close to seven repeated 24 h recall. This suggests that a week recall could be an alternative indicator to single 24 h recall.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Arimond M, Ruel MT: Progress in developing an infant and child feeding index: An example using the Ethiopia demographic and health survey 2000. Food Consumption and Nutrition Division Discussion Paper. Washington. DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2002. Chaparro C, Lutter C. Beyond survival: integrated delivery care practices for long-term maternal and infant nutrition, health and development. Washington DC: Pan American Health Organization; 2007. World Health Organization: Infant and young child feeding (IYCF) Model Chapter for textbooks for medical students and allied health professionals. 2009, Switzerland: World Health Organization. World Health Organization. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks: WHO, 2009:62. Black RE, Allen LH, Bhutta ZA, Caulfield LE, De Onis M, Ezzati M, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition: global and regional exposures and health consequences. Lancet. 2008;371:243–60. WHO, USAID, UNICEF, AED, FANTA, UC Davis: Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices, part 2: measurement. Ruel MT, Arimond M. Measuring childcare practices: approaches, indicators, and implications for programs. Food policy review no. 6. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2003. Hector DJ. Complexities and subtleties in the measurement and reporting of breastfeeding practices. Int Breastfeed J. 2011;6:5. Agampodi SB, Agampodi TC, De Silva A. Exclusive breastfeeding in Sri Lanka: problems of interpretation of reported rates. Int Breastfeed J. 2009;4:14. Greiner T. Exclusive breastfeeding: measurement and indicators. Int Breastfeed J. 2014;9:18. World Health Organization: Indicators for assessing breast-feeding practices: Reprinted report of an informal meeting, 11–12 June 1991 Geneva. Belo MM, Serva GB, Serva VB, Batista Filho M, Figueiroa JN. Caminha MdFtC. Results of research into the frequency of exclusive breastfeeding vary depending on the approach taken in the interview. J Pediatr. 2011;87(4):364–8. Aarts C. Exclusive breastfeeding-does it make a difference?: a longitudinal, prospective study of daily feeding practices, health and growth in a sample of Swedish infants (doctoral dissertation): Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis; 2001. Engebretsen IMS, Wamani H, Karamagi C, Semiyaga N, Tumwine J, Tylleskar T. Low adherence to exclusive breastfeeding in eastern Uganda: a community-based cross-sectional study comparing dietary recall since birth with 24-hour recall. BMC Pediatr. 2007;7:10. Engebretsen IM, Shanmugam R, Sommerfelt AE, Twmwine J, Tylleskar T. Infant feeding modalities addressed in two different ways in eastern Uganda. Int Breastfeed J. 2010;5:2. Aarts C, Kylberg A, Hofvander Y, Gebre-Medhin M, Greiner T. How exclusive is exclusive breastfeeding? A comparison of data since birth with current status data. Int J Epidemiol. 2000;29(6):1041–6. Ssenyonga R, Muwonge R, Nankya I. Towards a better understanding of exclusive breastfeeding in the era of HIV/AIDS: a study of prevalence and factors associated with exclusive breastfeeding from birth, in Rakai, Uganda. J Trop Pediatr. 2004;50:348–53. Van Beusekom I, Vossenaar M, Montenegro-Bethancourt G, Doak CM, Solomons NW. Estimates of exclusive breastfeeding rates among mother-infant dyads in Quetzaltenango, Guatemala, vary according to interview method and time frame. Food Nutr Bull. 2013;34(2):160–8. Piwoz EG. Creed de Kanashiro H, Lopez de Romana G, black RE, Brown KH: potential for misclassification of infants' usual feeding practices using 24-hour dietary assessment methods. J Nutr. 1995;125:57–65. Perera PJ, Ranathunga N, Fernando MP, Sampath W, Samaranayake GB. Actual exclusive breastfeeding rates and determinants among a cohort of children living in Gampaha district Sri Lanka: a prospective observational study. Int Breastfeed J. 2012;7:21. Bland RM, Rollins NC, Solarsh G, Van den Broeck J, Coovadia HM. Maternal recall of exclusive breast feeding duration. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88(9):778–83. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2011 Central Statistical Agency Addis Ababa. Ethiopia ICF International Calverton, Maryland, USA, 2012. Burnham L, Buczek M, Braun N, Feldman-Winter L, Chen N, Merewood A. Determining length of breastfeeding exclusivity: validity of maternal report 2 years after birth. J Hum Lact. 2014;30:190–4. World Health Organization (WHO): Breastfeeding and replacement feeding practices in the context of mother-to-child transmission of HIV: an assessment tool for research. 2001, Geneva: WHO. Natland ST, Andersen LF, Nilsen TIL, Forsmo S, Jacobsen GW. Maternal recall of breastfeeding duration twenty years after delivery. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:179. Barbosa RW, Oliveira AE, Zandonade E, Neto S. Mothers' memory about breastfeeding and sucking habits in the first months of life for their children. Rev Paul de Pediatr. 2012;30(2):180–6. Li R, Scanlon KS, Serdula MK. The validity and reliability of maternal recall of breastfeeding practice. Nutr Rev. 2005;63:103–10.