Comparison of Functional Results of Hip Resurfacing and Total Hip Replacement: A Review of the Literature
Tóm tắt
Từ khóa
Tài liệu tham khảo
Australian Orthopaedic Association Joint Replacement Register. In annual report, 2009.
Eskelinen, 2005, Total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthrosis in younger patients in the Finnish arthroplasty register. 4,661 primary replacements followed for 0–22 years, Acta Orthop, 76, 28, 10.1080/00016470510030292
Furnes, 2001, Hip disease and the prognosis of total hip replacements. A review of 53,698 primary total hip replacements reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register 1987–99, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 83, 579, 10.1302/0301-620X.83B4.11223
Malchau, 1993, Prognosis of total hip replacement in Sweden. Follow-up of 92,675 operations performed 1978–1990, Acta Orthop Scand, 64, 497, 10.3109/17453679308993679
Corten, 2010, Hip resurfacing data from national joint registries: what do they tell us? What do they not tell us?, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, 351, 10.1007/s11999-009-1157-3
Murphy, 2009, Patients’ perceptions of hip resurfacing arthroplasty, Orthopedics, 32, 730, 10.3928/01477447-20090818-10
Bozic, 2010, Do the potential benefits of metal-on-metal hip resurfacing justify the increased cost and risk of complications?, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, 2301, 10.1007/s11999-010-1301-0
Marker, 2009, Resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty-review of comparative clinical and basic science studies, Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis, 67, 120
Quesada, 2008, Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: advantages and disadvantages, J Arthroplasty, 23, 69, 10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.015
Kluess, 2008, Limited range of motion of hip resurfacing arthroplasty due to unfavorable ratio of prosthetic head size and femoral neck diameter, Acta Orthop, 79, 748, 10.1080/17453670810016803
Bengs, 2008, Less range of motion with resurfacing arthroplasty than with total hip arthroplasty: in vitro examination of 8 designs, Acta Orthop, 79, 755, 10.1080/17453670810016812
Incavo, 2010, Which procedure better restores intact hip range of motion: total hip arthroplasty or resurfacing? A combined cadaveric and computer simulation study, J Arthroplasty
Vail, 2006, Metal-on-metal hip resurfacing compares favorably with THA at 2 years followup, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 453, 123, 10.1097/01.blo.0000238852.08497.92
Lavigne M, Mottard S, Girard J, et al. Range of motion after hip resurfacing and THA: a single-blind randomized clinical study. Proceedings of the 75th Annual American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Meeting. San Francisco, March 5–9, 2008. p. 384.
Le Duff, 2009, Range of motion after stemmed total hip arthroplasty and hip resurfacing-a clinical study, Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis, 67, 177
Killampalli, 2009, Resurfacing and uncemented arthroplasty for young hip arthritis: functional outcomes at 5 years, Hip Int, 19, 234, 10.1177/112070000901900308
Mont, 2009, Resurfacing is comparable to total hip arthroplasty at short-term follow-up, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 467, 66, 10.1007/s11999-008-0465-3
Pattyn, 2008, Primary ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement versus metal-on-metal hip resurfacing in young active patients, Orthopedics, 31, 1078, 10.3928/01477447-20081101-23
Pollard, 2006, Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip. A five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88, 592, 10.1302/0301-620X.88B5.17354
Vendittoli, 2006, A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing in patients less than 65 years old, Hip Int, 16, 73, 10.5301/HIP.2008.1446
Zywiel, 2009, Resurfacing matched to standard total hip arthroplasty by preoperative activity levels - a comparison of postoperative outcomes, Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis, 67, 116
Wamper, 2010, The Harris hip score: do ceiling effects limit its usefulness in orthopedics?, Acta Orthop, 81, 703, 10.3109/17453674.2010.537808
Dora, 2007, Iliopsoas impingement after total hip replacement: the results of non-operative management, tenotomy or acetabular revision, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 89, 1031, 10.1302/0301-620X.89B8.19208
O’Sullivan, 2007, Iliopsoas tendonitis a complication after total hip arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 22, 166
Bin Nasser, 2010, Incidence of groin pain after metal-on-metal hip resurfacing, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, 392, 10.1007/s11999-009-1133-y
Bartelt, 2010, The prevalence of groin pain after metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and total hip resurfacing, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, 2346, 10.1007/s11999-010-1356-y
Hall, 2009, Patient-reported outcome following metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip and total hip replacement, Hip Int, 19, 245, 10.1177/112070000901900310
Vendittoli, 2010, A comparison of clinical results of hip resurfacing arthroplasty and 28 mm metal on metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomised trial with 3–6 years follow-up, Hip Int, 20, 1, 10.1177/112070001002000101
Stulberg, 2010, Early return to function after hip resurfacing: is it better than contemporary total hip arthroplasty?, J Arthroplasty, 25, 748, 10.1016/j.arth.2009.05.034
Garbuz, 2010, The John Charnley Award: metal-on-metal hip resurfacing versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, 318, 10.1007/s11999-009-1029-x
Girard, 2006, Biomechanical reconstruction of the hip: a randomised study comparing total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 88, 721, 10.1302/0301-620X.88B6.17447
Ahmad, 2009, Leg length and offset following hip resurfacing and hip replacement, Hip Int, 19, 136, 10.1177/112070000901900210
Robb, 2009, Radiographic assessment of biomechanical parameters following hip resurfacing and cemented total hip arthroplasty, Hip Int, 19, 251, 10.1177/112070000901900311
Loughead, 2005, Comparison of offset in Birmingham hip resurfacing and hybrid total hip arthroplasty, J Bone Joint Surg Br, 87, 163, 10.1302/0301-620X.87B2.15151
Mont, 2007, Gait analysis of patients with resurfacing hip arthroplasty compared with hip osteoarthritis and standard total hip arthroplasty, J Arthroplasty, 22, 100, 10.1016/j.arth.2006.03.010
Shrader, 2009, Gait and stair function in total and resurfacing hip arthroplasty: a pilot study, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 467, 1476, 10.1007/s11999-009-0791-0
Lavigne, 2010, The John Charnley Award: the functional outcome of hip resurfacing and large-head THA is the same: a randomized, double-blind study, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, 326, 10.1007/s11999-009-0938-z
Shimmin A, Bennell K, Wrigley T, et al. Gait analysis comparison of the functional outcome of hip resurfacing and total hip replacement. Proceedings of the 75th Annual American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Meeting. San Francisco, March 5–9, 2008. p. 382.
Sandiford, 2010, Metal on metal hip resurfacing versus uncemented custom total hip replacement–early results, J Orthop Surg Res, 5, 8, 10.1186/1749-799X-5-8
Rahman, 2010, What is the midterm survivorship and function after hip resurfacing?, Clin Orthop Relat Res, 468, 3221, 10.1007/s11999-010-1438-x
Fowble, 2009, A comparison of total hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty - patients and outcomes, Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis, 67, 108