Decision support for construction method selection in concrete buildings: Prefabrication adoption and optimization

Automation in Construction - Tập 19 - Trang 665-675 - 2010
Ying Chen1,2, Gül E. Okudan3, David R. Riley2
1Department of Construction Management, School of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, P.R. China
2Department of Architectural Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, 104 Engineering Unit A, University Park, PA, USA
3Department of Industr.ial and Manufacturing Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA

Tài liệu tham khảo

Egan, 1998 Eastman, 2008, Relative productivity in the AEC industries in the United States for on-site and off-site activities, Journal of construction engineering and management, 134, 517, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2008)134:7(517) Yee, 2001, Structural and economic benefits of precast/prestressed concrete construction, PCI Journal, 7–8, 34, 10.15554/pcij.07012001.34.42 Yee, 2001, Social and environmental benefits of precast concrete technology, PCI Journal, 5–6, 14, 10.15554/pcij.05012001.14.19 Sacks, 2004, Process model perspectives on management and engineering procedures in the precast/prestressed concrete industry, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 130, 206, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2004)130:2(206) Pasquire, 2002, Leaner construction through off-site manufacturing, 263 Idrus, 2002, Construction related factors influencing the choice of concrete floor systems, Construction Management and Economics, 3, 127 Gibb, 2005, What should you really measure if you want to compare prefabrication with traditional construction?, 481 Blismas, 2006, Benefit evaluation for off-site production in construction, Construction Management and Economics, 24, 121, 10.1080/01446190500184444 Murtaza, 1993, Knowledge-based approach to modular construction decision support, Journal of Construction Engineering Management, 119, 115, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1993)119:1(115) Murtaza, 1994, Neuromodex — neural network system for modular construction decision making, Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 8, 221, 10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3801(1994)8:2(221) Song, 2005, Considering prework on industrial projects, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 131, 723, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2005)131:6(723) Soetanto, 2005, A framework for objective structural frame selection, Structures & Buildings, 159, 45 Y.P. Luo, Decision support for prefabrication strategy selection on building systems, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Architectural Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, 2008. Burke, 1991, Introduction to artificial neural systems for pattern recognition, Computers and Operations Research, 18, 211, 10.1016/0305-0548(91)90091-5 Hazelrigg, 1998, A framework for decision-based engineering design, Journal of Mechanical Design, 120, 653, 10.1115/1.2829328 Walls, 1995, Integrating business strategy and capital allocation: an application of multi-objective decision making, The Engineering Economist, 40, 247, 10.1080/00137919508903152 Gurnani, 2005, Robust multi-attribute decision making under risk and uncertainty in engineering design, Engineering Optimization, 813, 10.1080/03052150500340520 Thevenot, 2007, A multi-attribute utility theory-based method for product line selection, Journal of Mechanical Design, 129, 1179, 10.1115/1.2771574 Vasan, 2007, Multi-attribute utility theory for irrigation system evaluation, Water Resource Management, 21, 717, 10.1007/s11269-006-9060-0 Sanayei, 2008, An integrated group decision-making process for supplier selection and order allocation using multi-attribute utility theory and linear programming, Journal of the Franklin Institute, 345, 731, 10.1016/j.jfranklin.2008.03.005 Kim, 2009, A MAUT approach for selecting a dismantling scenario for the thermal column in KRR-1, Annals of Nuclear Energy, 36, 145, 10.1016/j.anucene.2008.11.034 Hatush, 1998, Contractor selection using multi-criteria utility theory: an additive model, Building and Environment, 33, 105, 10.1016/S0360-1323(97)00016-4 Keeney, 1993 Keeney, 1971, Utility independence and preferences for multi-attributed consequences, Operations Research, 19, 875, 10.1287/opre.19.4.875 Mustafa, 1990, Decision support for bid evaluation, Project Management, 8, 230, 10.1016/0263-7863(90)90031-6 Y. Chen, G.E. Okudan, D.R. Riley, A prescreening tool for prefabrication adoption in concrete buildings, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management (2009) (The manuscript is being revised based on reviewers' evaluations). Chen, 2010, Sustainable performance criteria for construction method selection in concrete buildings, Automation in Construction, 19, 235, 10.1016/j.autcon.2009.10.004 Delquie, 1997, A simple trade-off condition for additive multi-attribute utility, Journal of Multi-criteria Decision Analysis, 6, 248, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1360(199709)6:5<248::AID-MCDA151>3.0.CO;2-W Keeney, 1977, Nuclear siting using decision analysis, Energy Policy, 4, 223, 10.1016/0301-4215(77)90038-6 Kirkwood, 1997 Von Winterfeldt, 1986 Ananda, 2005, Evaluating public risk preferences in forest land-sued choices using multi-attribute utility theory, Ecological Economics, 55, 408, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.12.015 Wang, 2005, A preference aggregation method through the estimation of utility intervals, Computer & Operations Research, 32, 2027, 10.1016/j.cor.2004.01.005 Jaillon, 2009, The evolution of prefabrication residential building systems in Hong Kong: a review of the public and the private sector, Automation in Construction, 18, 239, 10.1016/j.autcon.2008.09.002 Kidd, 1990, A practical example of multi attribute decision aiding technique, Omega, 18, 139, 10.1016/0305-0483(90)90061-D