Price leadership, spying, and secret price changes: a Stackelberg game with imperfect commitment

International Journal of Game Theory - Tập 52 - Trang 775-804 - 2023
Cuihong Fan1, Byoung Heon Jun2, Elmar G. Wolfstetter3
1School of Economics, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai, China
2Department of Economics, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
3School of Business and Economics, Humboldt-University at Berlin, Berlin, Germany

Tóm tắt

We analyze price leadership in a Stackelberg game with incomplete information and imperfect commitment. Sequential play is induced by an information system, represented by a spy, that reports the price of one firm to its rival before the latter chooses its own price. However, the Stackelberg leader may secretly revise its price with some probability. Therefore, the spy’s message is only an imperfect signal. This gives rise to a complex signaling problem where both sender and receiver of messages have private information and the sender has a chance to take another action with some probability. We find partially separating and pooling equilibria that satisfy equilibrium refinements such as the intuitive criterion and support collusive outcomes.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Albæk S (1990) Stackelberg leadership as a natural solution under cost uncertainty. J Ind Econ 38:335–347 Amir R, Grilo I (1999) Stackelberg versus Cournot equilibrium. Games Econ Behav 26:1–22 Amir R, Grilo I, Jin J (2009) Demand-induced endogenous price leadership. Int Game Theory Rev 1:219–240 Andreyanov P, Davidson A, Korovkin V (2017) Detecting auctioneer corruption: evidence from Russian procurement auctions. mimeo., UCLA Austin A (2005) Adam Smith on the inevitability of price fixing. Case W Res Law Rev 55:501–523 Bagwell K (1995) Commitment and observability in games. Games Econ Behav 8:271–280 Barrachina A, Tauman Y, Urbano A (2014) Entry and espionage with noisy signals. Games Econ Behav 83:127–146 Barrachina A, Tauman Y, Urbano A (2021) Entry with two correlated signals: the case of industrial espionage and its positive competitive effects. Internat J Game Theory 50:241–278 Cho IK, Kreps D (1987) Signaling games and stable equilibria. Quart J Econ 102:179–221 Cho IK, Sobel J (1990) Strategic stability and uniqueness in signaling games. J Econ Theory 50:381–413 Dowrick S (1986) von Stackelberg and Cournot duopoly: choosing roles. RAND J Econ 17:251–260 Fan C, Jun B, Wolfstetter E (2022a) Spying in Bertrand markets under incomplete information: who benefits and is it stable? J Math Econ 102 (October): Article 102722 Fan C, Jun B, Wolfstetter E (2022b) Supplement to “Price leadership, spying, and secret price changes: a Stackelberg game with imperfect commitment”. Working paper, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UPRuyri2Duygd4QQYIIwGCN2VPzrJ8cp/view Gal-Or E (1985) First mover and second mover advantages. Int Econ Rev 26:649–653 Green EJ, Porter RH (1984) Noncooperative collusion under imperfect price information. Econometrica 52:87–100 Hamilton J, Slutsky S (1990) Endogenous timing in duopoly games: Stackelberg or Cournot equilibria. Games Econ Behav 2:29–46 Ivanov D, Nesterov A (2020) Stealed-bid auctions: detecting bid leakage via semi-supervised learning. Working paper Kozlovskaya M (2018) Industrial espionage in duopoly games. Discussion paper, SSRN Kreps D, Sobel J (1994) Signalling. In: Aumann R, Hart S (eds) Handbook of game theory with economic applications, vol 2. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 849–867 Lengwiler Y, Wolfstetter E (2010) Auctions and corruption: an analysis of bid rigging by a corrupt auctioneer. J Econ Dyn Control 34:1872–1892 Maggi G (1999) The value of commitment with imperfect observability and private information. RAND J Econ 30:571–594 Milgrom P, Roberts J (1982) Limit pricing and entry under incomplete information: a general equilibrium analysis. Econometrica 50:443–459 Mouraviev I, Rey P (2011) Collusion and leadership. Int J Ind Org 29:705–717 Porter R (1983) A study of cartel stability: the joint executive committee, 1880–1886. Bell J Econ 14:301–314 Rotemberg J, Saloner G (1986) A supergame-theoretic model of price wars during booms. Am Econ Rev 76:390–407 Smith A (1776) The Wealth of Nations, (reprinted 1970) edn. Everyman’s Library, Dent & Sons, New York Sobel J (2009) Signaling games. In: Myers R (ed) Encyclopedia of complexity and system science. Springer, New York, pp 8125–8139 Solan I, Yariv L (2004) Games with espionage. Games Econ Behav 47:172–199 Stigler GJ (1964) A theory of oligopoly. J Polit Econ 72:44–61 van Damme E, Hurkens S (1996) Commitment-robust equilibria and endogenous timing. Games Econ Behav 15:290–311 van Damme E, Hurkens S (2004) Endogenous price leadership. Games Econ Behav 47:404–420 Wang T (2020) Competitive intelligence and disclosure of cost information in duopoly. Rev Ind Org 57:665–699 Zhang H (2015) Three essays on the incentives for information acquisition and information sharing in competitive environments. PhD thesis, University of California Riverside